From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com,
mjambigi@linux.ibm.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch
Cc: tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: drop the abort_work reference when the work is cancelled
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 17:20:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anRR9doLcvlPAj4Q@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806081549.595001-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
On 2026-08-06 10:15:49, Hidayath Khan wrote:
>The schedulers of conn->abort_work hand a socket reference to the work
>item and rely on it to give the reference back:
>
> sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock_put in abort_work */
> if (!queue_work(smc_close_wq, &conn->abort_work))
> sock_put(&smc->sk);
>
>The queue_work() failure case is handled, but the cancellation case is
>not. smc_conn_free() cancels a still-pending abort_work:
>
> if (current_work() != &conn->abort_work)
> cancel_work_sync(&conn->abort_work);
>
>and discards the return value. When cancel_work_sync() returns true the
>work was queued but had not started, so smc_conn_abort_work() never runs
>and its sock_put() never happens. The reference is lost.
>
>As in smc_switch_conns(), a leaked sk_refcnt means the smc_sock is never
>destroyed: its buffers stay allocated and the network namespace reference
>a user socket holds is never released, so the netns cannot be torn down.
>
>smc_cdc_msg_validate() queues abort_work from the receive tasklet when a
>peer sends a CDC message with an out-of-order sequence number, so a
>remote peer combined with a concurrent local close is enough to reach it.
>
>Drop the reference when the work is cancelled, matching the pattern
>smc_close_cancel_work() already uses for conn->close_work:
>
> if (cancel_work_sync(&smc->conn.close_work))
> sock_put(sk);
>
>The sock_put() is safe here: every caller of smc_conn_free() passes the
>connection of a socket it holds a reference to, so this cannot release
>the last one.
>
>Fixes: b286a0651e44 ("net/smc: handle incoming CDC validation message")
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Reviewed-by: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Best regards,
Dust
>---
> net/smc/smc_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
>index c0027d2fe4e8..dd9fffbe41e0 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
>@@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ static void smc_buf_unuse(struct smc_connection *conn,
> /* remove a finished connection from its link group */
> void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
> {
>+ struct smc_sock *smc = container_of(conn, struct smc_sock, conn);
> struct smc_link_group *lgr = conn->lgr;
>
> if (!lgr || conn->freed)
>@@ -1277,8 +1278,13 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
> tasklet_kill(&conn->rx_tsklet);
> } else {
> smc_cdc_wait_pend_tx_wr(conn);
>- if (current_work() != &conn->abort_work)
>- cancel_work_sync(&conn->abort_work);
>+ /* If the work was pending (cancel returns true) it never ran,
>+ * so the sock_hold taken by its scheduler was never released.
>+ */
>+ if (current_work() != &conn->abort_work) {
>+ if (cancel_work_sync(&conn->abort_work))
>+ sock_put(&smc->sk);
>+ }
> }
> if (!list_empty(&lgr->list)) {
> smc_buf_unuse(conn, lgr); /* allow buffer reuse */
>
>base-commit: 2b1c2bc2355fd59cc75045e42d9dc5470ef5fa9a
>--
>2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 8:15 [PATCH net] net/smc: drop the abort_work reference when the work is cancelled Hidayath Khan
2026-08-06 9:20 ` Dust Li [this message]
2026-08-07 8:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anRR9doLcvlPAj4Q@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox