From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:S390 ARCHITECTURE" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] s390/cert_store: Track subsystem keys instead of re-registering key_type
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 14:06:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aunOUm3qSnaNTF2x@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103030226.2685251-7-jarkko@kernel.org>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 05:02:11AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> cert_store refreshes its keyring by unregistering and re-registering
> key_type_cert_store_key so key_type_dead garbage collection sweeps old
> keys, while leaving userspace-linked keys behind.
>
> The removal of key_type_dead will eliminate that sweep.
>
> Register key_type_cert_store_key once during init before creating sysfs
> attributes, and track subsystem-created keys explicitly so refresh
> unlinks and invalidates previous entries directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
I would not take this yet too seriously although I've tried to do it
carefully. I just needed to find some solutions for intersection
points, and thus this is more like "WiP" (and patch set is RFC).
I need rework the gist of the whole patch set a bit more than I
first thought. I.e. things like DNS resolver set some walls of
the feasibility of the chosen approach.
Br, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261103030226.2685251-1-jarkko@kernel.org>
2026-11-03 3:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] s390/cert_store: Track subsystem keys instead of re-registering key_type Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-03 12:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-11-04 3:03 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aunOUm3qSnaNTF2x@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox