From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: uv: Extend guest test and add host test
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 10:16:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b36ae9db-6973-8b4b-36a8-5291edf823b1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519074022.7368-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 19/05/2021 09.40, Janosch Frank wrote:
> My stack of patches is starting to lean, so lets try to put some of
> them upstream...
>
> The first part is just additions to the UV guest test and a library
> that makes checking the installed UV calls easier. Additionally we now
> check for the proper UV share/unshare availability when allocating IO
> memory instead of only relying on stfle 158.
>
> The second part adds a UV host test with a large number UV of return
> code checks.
>
> v3:
> * Minor changes due to review
> * I'll pick this on Friday if there are no more remarks
From a very quick look on the patches, this looks fine to me.
Series
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 7:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: uv: Extend guest test and add host test Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: uv-guest: Add invalid share location test Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] s390x: Add more Ultravisor command structure definitions Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: uv: Add UV lib Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] s390x: Test for share/unshare call support before using them Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] s390x: uv-guest: Test invalid commands Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: Add UV host test Janosch Frank
2021-05-19 8:16 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b36ae9db-6973-8b4b-36a8-5291edf823b1@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox