From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
drjones@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/3] s390x: css: pv: css test adaptation for PV
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:03:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4656e81-1492-d902-73cf-5a08a0a6247d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611085944-21609-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On 19/01/2021 20.52, Pierre Morel wrote:
> We want the tests to automatically work with or without protected
> virtualisation.
> To do this we need to share the I/O memory with the host.
>
> Let's replace all static allocations with dynamic allocations
> to clearly separate shared and private memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/s390x/css.c b/s390x/css.c
> index ee3bc83..4b0b6b1 100644
> --- a/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/s390x/css.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
> #include <interrupt.h>
> #include <asm/arch_def.h>
>
> +#include <malloc_io.h>
> #include <css.h>
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
>
> #define DEFAULT_CU_TYPE 0x3832 /* virtio-ccw */
> static unsigned long cu_type = DEFAULT_CU_TYPE;
>
> static int test_device_sid;
> -static struct senseid senseid;
> +static struct senseid *senseid;
>
> static void test_enumerate(void)
> {
> @@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ static void test_enable(void)
> */
> static void test_sense(void)
> {
> + struct ccw1 *ccw;
> int ret;
> int len;
>
> @@ -80,9 +83,15 @@ static void test_sense(void)
>
> lowcore_ptr->io_int_param = 0;
>
> - memset(&senseid, 0, sizeof(senseid));
> - ret = start_single_ccw(test_device_sid, CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID,
> - &senseid, sizeof(senseid), CCW_F_SLI);
> + senseid = alloc_io_page(sizeof(*senseid));
Would it make sense to move the above alloc_io_page into the ccw_alloc()
function, too?
> + if (!senseid)
> + goto error_senseid;
> +
> + ccw = ccw_alloc(CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, senseid, sizeof(*senseid), CCW_F_SLI);
> + if (!ccw)
> + goto error_ccw;
> +
> + ret = start_ccw1_chain(test_device_sid, ccw);
> if (ret)
> goto error;
I think you should add a "report(0, ...)" or report_abort() in front of all
three gotos above - otherwise the problems might go unnoticed.
> @@ -97,7 +106,7 @@ static void test_sense(void)
> if (ret < 0) {
> report_info("no valid residual count");
> } else if (ret != 0) {
> - len = sizeof(senseid) - ret;
> + len = sizeof(*senseid) - ret;
> if (ret && len < CSS_SENSEID_COMMON_LEN) {
> report(0, "transferred a too short length: %d", ret);
> goto error;
> @@ -105,21 +114,25 @@ static void test_sense(void)
> report_info("transferred a shorter length: %d", len);
> }
>
> - if (senseid.reserved != 0xff) {
> - report(0, "transferred garbage: 0x%02x", senseid.reserved);
> + if (senseid->reserved != 0xff) {
> + report(0, "transferred garbage: 0x%02x", senseid->reserved);
> goto error;
> }
>
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> report_info("reserved 0x%02x cu_type 0x%04x cu_model 0x%02x dev_type 0x%04x dev_model 0x%02x",
> - senseid.reserved, senseid.cu_type, senseid.cu_model,
> - senseid.dev_type, senseid.dev_model);
> + senseid->reserved, senseid->cu_type, senseid->cu_model,
> + senseid->dev_type, senseid->dev_model);
>
> - report(senseid.cu_type == cu_type, "cu_type expected 0x%04x got 0x%04x",
> - (uint16_t) cu_type, senseid.cu_type);
> + report(senseid->cu_type == cu_type, "cu_type expected 0x%04x got 0x%04x",
> + (uint16_t) cu_type, senseid->cu_type);
>
> error:
> + free_io_page(ccw);
> +error_ccw:
> + free_io_page(senseid);
> +error_senseid:
> unregister_io_int_func(css_irq_io);
> }
>
>
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 19:52 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/3] s390x: css: pv: css test adaptation for PV Pierre Morel
2021-01-19 19:52 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/3] s390x: pv: implement routine to share/unshare memory Pierre Morel
2021-01-20 10:48 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-20 12:16 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-20 16:48 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-01-19 19:52 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/3] s390x: define UV compatible I/O allocation Pierre Morel
2021-01-20 11:01 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-20 12:39 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-20 12:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-01-20 12:41 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-19 19:52 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/3] s390x: css: pv: css test adaptation for PV Pierre Morel
2021-01-20 12:03 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-01-21 9:07 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4656e81-1492-d902-73cf-5a08a0a6247d@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox