public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: wintera@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	kgraul@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	raspl@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
	guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 07/10] net/smc: compatible with 128-bits extended GID of virtual ISM device
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:22:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7ae6ca1-efb4-0f35-8f83-ecd28ab16632@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219115952.GL811967@kernel.org>



On 2023/12/19 19:59, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:45:33PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>> According to virtual ISM support feature defined by SMCv2.1, GIDs of
>> virtual ISM device are UUIDs defined by RFC4122, which are 128-bits
>> long. So some adaptation work is required. And note that the GIDs of
>> existing platform firmware ISM devices still remain 64-bits long.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -1023,9 +1041,12 @@ smcd_clc_prep_confirm_accept(struct smc_connection *conn,
>>   	if (version == SMC_V1) {
>>   		clc->hdr.length = htons(SMCD_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN);
>>   	} else {
>> -		clc->d1.chid = htons(smc_ism_get_chid(smcd));
>> +		chid = smc_ism_get_chid(smcd);
>> +		clc->d1.chid = htons(chid);
>>   		if (eid && eid[0])
>>   			memcpy(clc->d1.eid, eid, SMC_MAX_EID_LEN);
>> +		if (__smc_ism_is_virtual(chid))
>> +			clc->d1.gid_ext = htonll(smcd_gid.gid_ext);
> 
> Hi Wen Gu,
> 
> The type of clc->d1.gid_ext is u64 (host byte-order)
> but here it is being assigned a big endian value.
> This does not seem correct.
> 
> Flagged by Smatch.

Oh, thank you Simon! That's a regression. I mistakenly changed the type
to u64 instead of __be64 in previous versions when fixing conflicts.
Thank you very much for the catch.

> 
>>   		len = SMCD_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN_V2;
>>   		if (first_contact) {
>>   			*fce_len = smc_clc_fill_fce_v2x(fce_v2x, ini);
> 
> ...
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-19 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-19  8:45 [PATCH net-next v7 00/10] net/smc: implement SMCv2.1 virtual ISM device support Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 01/10] net/smc: rename some 'fce' to 'fce_v2x' for clarity Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 02/10] net/smc: introduce sub-functions for smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 03/10] net/smc: unify the structs of accept or confirm message for v1 and v2 Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 04/10] net/smc: support SMCv2.x supplemental features negotiation Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 05/10] net/smc: introduce virtual ISM device support feature Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 06/10] net/smc: define a reserved CHID range for virtual ISM devices Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 07/10] net/smc: compatible with 128-bits extended GID of virtual ISM device Wen Gu
2023-12-19 11:59   ` Simon Horman
2023-12-19 12:22     ` Wen Gu [this message]
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 08/10] net/smc: support extended GID in SMC-D lgr netlink attribute Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 09/10] net/smc: disable SEID on non-s390 archs where virtual ISM may be used Wen Gu
2023-12-19  8:45 ` [PATCH net-next v7 10/10] net/smc: manage system EID in SMC stack instead of ISM driver Wen Gu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7ae6ca1-efb4-0f35-8f83-ecd28ab16632@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox