From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix AR parameter in ioctl
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:49:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbe1db67-386b-4738-83d5-6e02cd3c9d58@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220211211.3102609-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/20/24 22:12, Eric Farman wrote:
> Hi Janosch,
>
> Here is a new (final?) version for the AR/MEM_OP issue I'm attempting to
> address. Hopefully they can be picked up to whatever tree makes sense.
>
I've got good and bad news for you :)
You need to re-base this patch set on Heiko's feature branch once my kvm
fpu patch is on there since the current version runs into conflicts with
Heiko's fpu rework. We'll contact you once that's the case. The patch
made it onto devel yesterday evening and I assumed you'd wait a bit
until sending a new version but I was mistaken.
Apart from that, there's not much to do.
Drop Christian's Acks, as I said, they were solely for the question if
we'll move your patches via Heiko's repo. Ack + rev-by doesn't make
sense anyway.
Tanks for taking on this problem and fixing it!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 21:12 [PATCH v4 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix AR parameter in ioctl Eric Farman
2024-02-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: s390: fix access register usage in ioctls Eric Farman
2024-02-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: s390: selftests: memop: add a simple AR test Eric Farman
2024-02-21 7:49 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix AR parameter in ioctl Heiko Carstens
2024-02-21 11:43 ` Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbe1db67-386b-4738-83d5-6e02cd3c9d58@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox