From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: s390: fix access register usage in ioctls
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:19:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c64a7f44-2407-472d-8197-995b38ae2214@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d9fef3d-b793-43fc-a3f9-4ff087bc899f@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/20/24 15:15, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.02.24 um 22:36 schrieb Eric Farman:
>> The routine ar_translation() can be reached by both the instruction
>> intercept path (where the access registers had been loaded with the
>> guest register contents), and the MEM_OP ioctls (which hadn't).
>> Since this routine saves the current registers to vcpu->run,
>> this routine erroneously saves host registers into the guest space.
>>
>> Introduce a boolean in the kvm_vcpu_arch struct to indicate whether
>> the registers contain guest contents. If they do (the instruction
>> intercept path), the save can be performed and the AR translation
>> is done just as it is today. If they don't (the MEM_OP path), the
>> AR can be read from vcpu->run without stashing the current contents.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
>
Just spoke with Christian since that's a mixed signal.
To move this over the s390 tree:
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
For the Patch in general:
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 21:36 [PATCH v3 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix AR parameter in ioctl Eric Farman
2024-02-16 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: s390: fix access register usage in ioctls Eric Farman
2024-02-19 9:51 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-02-20 13:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-02-20 14:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-02-20 14:19 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-02-20 15:48 ` Eric Farman
2024-02-16 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: s390: selftests: memop: add a simple AR test Eric Farman
2024-02-20 15:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c64a7f44-2407-472d-8197-995b38ae2214@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox