From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: Reaching official SMC maintainers
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:51:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cff8e035-b70a-4910-9af6-e62000c0b87e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dacadaef-4fec-4d5e-8b91-1a292ab43b37@yandex.ru>
On 2024/3/4 18:31, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Jakub,
>
> could you please check whether an official maintainers of net/smc are
> actually active? I'm interesting just because there was no feedback on
> [1]. After all, it's still a kernel memory leak, and IMO should not be
> silently ignored by the maintainers (if any).
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240221051608.43241-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru/
Hi, Dmitry, I think I have given my feedback about this, see:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/819353f3-f5f9-4a15-96a1-4f3a7fd6b33e@linux.alibaba.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/19d7d71b-c911-45cc-9671-235d98720be6@linux.alibaba.com/
IMHO, if we want to address the problem of fasync_struct entries being
incorrectly inserted to old socket, we may have to change the general code.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 10:31 Reaching official SMC maintainers Dmitry Antipov
2024-03-04 10:51 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2024-03-05 16:39 ` Dmitry Antipov
2024-03-06 10:36 ` Jan Karcher
2024-03-04 12:35 ` Wenjia Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cff8e035-b70a-4910-9af6-e62000c0b87e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox