From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/13] KVM: s390: Changes for 5.18 part1
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:18:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6c6803c-518f-8ab3-a2a5-b73f600ebafb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220222094910.18331-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/22/22 10:48, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> first part of the s390 parts of KVM for 5.18. This is on top of the fix
> that went into Linus tree, so it will move kvm/next to something between
> rc3 and rc4.
>
> I added 2 later fixups for the storage key patches on top. Let me know if
> you prefer them folded in.
>
> We might do a 2nd pull request later on depending on timing, review and
> other constraints
> with
> - rewritten selftest for memop
> - ultravisor device (could also go via s390 tree)
> - parts/all of Claudios lazy destroy
> - parts/all of PCI passthru (could be later and might go via s390 tree as
> well via a topic branch)
> - followup to guest entry/exit work if we find a small solution
> - adapter interruption virtualization facility for secure guests
>
> The following changes since commit 09a93c1df3eafa43bcdfd7bf837c574911f12f55:
>
> Merge tag 'kvm-s390-kernel-access' from emailed bundle (2022-02-09 09:14:22 -0800)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/kvm-s390-next-5.18-1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 3d9042f8b923810c169ece02d91c70ec498eff0b:
>
> KVM: s390: Add missing vm MEM_OP size check (2022-02-22 09:16:18 +0100)
Pulled, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-22 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-22 9:48 [GIT PULL 00/13] KVM: s390: Changes for 5.18 part1 Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:48 ` [GIT PULL 01/13] KVM: s390: MAINTAINERS: promote Claudio Imbrenda Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:48 ` [GIT PULL 02/13] s390/uaccess: Add copy_from/to_user_key functions Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 03/13] KVM: s390: Honor storage keys when accessing guest memory Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 04/13] KVM: s390: handle_tprot: Honor storage keys Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 05/13] KVM: s390: selftests: Test TEST PROTECTION emulation Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 06/13] KVM: s390: Add optional storage key checking to MEMOP IOCTL Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 07/13] KVM: s390: Add vm IOCTL for key checked guest absolute memory access Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 08/13] KVM: s390: Rename existing vcpu memop functions Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 09/13] KVM: s390: Add capability for storage key extension of MEM_OP IOCTL Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 10/13] KVM: s390: Update api documentation for memop ioctl Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 11/13] selftests: kvm: Check whether SIDA memop fails for normal guests Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 12/13] KVM: s390: Clarify key argument for MEM_OP in api docs Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 9:49 ` [GIT PULL 13/13] KVM: s390: Add missing vm MEM_OP size check Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 15:18 ` [GIT PULL 00/13] KVM: s390: Changes for 5.18 part1 Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-22 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6c6803c-518f-8ab3-a2a5-b73f600ebafb@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox