From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, ralf@linux-mips.org,
paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
chenhc@lemote.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, cai@lca.pw,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:20:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d748aae4-4d48-6f8a-2f6d-67fad5224ba9@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnjzsd8f.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
On 2019/9/17 13:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> writes:
>> When passing the return value of dev_to_node() to cpumask_of_node()
>> without checking if the device's node id is NUMA_NO_NODE, there is
>> global-out-of-bounds detected by KASAN.
>>
>> From the discussion [1], NUMA_NO_NODE really means no node affinity,
>> which also means all cpus should be usable. So the cpumask_of_node()
>> should always return all cpus online when user passes the node id as
>> NUMA_NO_NODE, just like similar semantic that page allocator handles
>> NUMA_NO_NODE.
>>
>> But we cannot really copy the page allocator logic. Simply because the
>> page allocator doesn't enforce the near node affinity. It just picks it
>> up as a preferred node but then it is free to fallback to any other numa
>> node. This is not the case here and node_to_cpumask_map will only restrict
>> to the particular node's cpus which would have really non deterministic
>> behavior depending on where the code is executed. So in fact we really
>> want to return cpu_online_mask for NUMA_NO_NODE.
>>
>> Some arches were already NUMA_NO_NODE aware, but they return cpu_all_mask,
>> which should be identical with cpu_online_mask when those arches do not
>> support cpu hotplug, this patch also changes them to return cpu_online_mask
>> in order to be consistent and use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of "-1".
>
> Except some of those arches *do* support CPU hotplug, powerpc and sparc
> at least. So switching from cpu_all_mask to cpu_online_mask is a
> meaningful change.
Yes, thanks for pointing out.
>
> That doesn't mean it's wrong, but you need to explain why it's the right
> change.
How about adding the below to the commit log:
Even if some of the arches do support CPU hotplug, it does not make sense
to return the cpu that has been hotplugged.
Any suggestion?
>
>
>> Also there is a debugging version of node_to_cpumask_map() for x86 and
>> arm64, which is only used when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is defined, this
>> patch changes it to handle NUMA_NO_NODE as normal node_to_cpumask_map().
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1125789/
>> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
>> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> ---
>> V5: Drop unsigned "fix" change for x86/arm64, and change comment log
>> according to Michal's comment.
>> V4: Have all these changes in a single patch.
>
> This makes it much harder to get the patch merged, you basically have to
> get Andrew Morton to merge it now. Sending individual patches for each
> arch means each arch maintainer can merge them separately.
I am new to the arch change here, and not sure which is the best way to get
the multi-arches change merged.
Do you think it is better to resend this as individual patches for each arch
after megre window?
thanks for reviewing.
>
> cheers
>
>> V3: Change to only handle NUMA_NO_NODE, and return cpu_online_mask
>> for NUMA_NO_NODE case, and change the commit log to better justify
>> the change.
>> V2: make the node id checking change to other arches too.
>> ---
>> arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 3 +++
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 3 +++
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h | 4 +++-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 6 +++---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 3 +++
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h | 6 +++---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +++
>> 10 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>> index 5a77a40..836c9e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> int cpu;
>>
>> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> - return cpu_all_mask;
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>>
>> cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> index 626ad01..c8a4b31 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
>> /* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
>> static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> {
>> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> +
>> return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>> }
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> index 4f241cc..f57202d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_to_cpumask_map);
>> */
>> const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> {
>> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> +
>> if (WARN_ON(node >= nr_node_ids))
>> return cpu_none_mask;
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
>> index 965f079..04505e6 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
>> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_ip27 {
>> extern struct cpuinfo_ip27 sn_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
>>
>> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (sn_cpu_info[(cpu)].p_nodeid)
>> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \
>> - cpu_all_mask : \
>> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \
>> + cpu_online_mask : \
>> &hub_data(node)->h_cpus)
>> struct pci_bus;
>> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *);
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
>> index 7ff819a..e78daa6 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
>> @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>>
>> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (cpu_logical_map(cpu) >> 2)
>> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) (&__node_data[(node)]->cpumask)
>> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \
>> + cpu_online_mask : \
>> + &__node_data[(node)]->cpumask)
>>
>> struct pci_bus;
>> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> index 2f7e1ea..309f847 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ struct device_node;
>>
>> #include <asm/mmzone.h>
>>
>> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \
>> - cpu_all_mask : \
>> - node_to_cpumask_map[node])
>> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \
>> + cpu_online_mask : \
>> + node_to_cpumask_map[node])
>>
>> struct pci_bus;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h
>> index cca406f..1bd2e73 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
>> #define cpumask_of_node cpumask_of_node
>> static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> {
>> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> +
>> return &node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
>> index 34c628a..8c29357 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
>> @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
>> return numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu];
>> }
>>
>> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \
>> - cpu_all_mask : \
>> - &numa_cpumask_lookup_table[node])
>> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \
>> + cpu_online_mask : \
>> + &numa_cpumask_lookup_table[node])
>>
>> struct pci_bus;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
>> index 4b14d23..7fa82e1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
>> /* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
>> static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> {
>> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> +
>> return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>> }
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> index e6dad60..84b28ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -861,6 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
>> */
>> const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> {
>> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> +
>> if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
>> printk(KERN_WARNING
>> "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
>> --
>> 2.8.1
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 13:28 [PATCH v5] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-17 5:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-17 6:20 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2019-09-17 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-17 9:53 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-17 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-17 11:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d748aae4-4d48-6f8a-2f6d-67fad5224ba9@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox