From: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
To: dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
sidraya@linux.ibm.com, hidayath@linux.ibm.com
Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:38:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df7fd794-2afc-4bcc-b9dd-6264afa2460c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apWEzobrZ3QR3IfN@linux.alibaba.com>
On 31/08/26 7:12 pm, Dust Li wrote:
> On 2026-08-28 08:54:37, Mahanta Jambigi wrote:
>> This series fixes multiple lifetime races in the SMC diag dump path.
>>
>> The first patch adds the basic infrastructure needed to synchronize diag readers
>> against connection-owned conn->lgr/conn->lnk updates. It introduces a
>> per-connection spinlock and uses it in the link switch and connection free
>> handoff paths. conn->lgr and conn->lnk are NULLed under the lock before the
>> borrowed references are released, so a non-NULL conn->lgr seen under the lock
>> guarantees the lgr object is alive. The diag reader can rely on this invariant
>> without borrowing any extra reference.
>>
>> The second patch fixes two races in smc_diag itself:
>>
>> - serialize clcsock field access against smc_clcsock_release() with
>> mutex_trylock()
>> - take conn->lgr_lnk_lock when reading conn->lgr and conn->lnk; use
>> smc_conn_lgr_valid() inside the lock to check that the connection is
>> still registered, then snapshot all required fields and call nla_put()
>> after releasing the lock
>
> Hi Mahanta,
>
> As discussed in the other thread, I think we should defer the release of
> smc->clcsock and remove clcsock_release_lock.
>
> In that case, we should no longer need these two patches. Also,
> introducing more locks in SMC is the last thing I want to do :)
Does your "[RFC net-next 0/7] net/smc: tie clcsock lifetime to the smc
socket and remove clcsock_release_lock" resolve conn.lgr/conn.lnk races
in __smc_diag_dump() against the concurrent tear-down paths?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 6:54 [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-28 6:54 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] net/smc: add connection lifetime infrastructure for diag Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-29 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 6:54 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] net/smc: fix races in smc_diag dump path Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-29 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 13:42 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races Dust Li
2026-08-31 14:08 ` Mahanta Jambigi [this message]
2026-08-31 14:57 ` Mahanta Jambigi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df7fd794-2afc-4bcc-b9dd-6264afa2460c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox