From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:19:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e548903d-ed72-d84f-8010-1bb765696ffe@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302174443.514363-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
On 02.03.21 18:44, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a nested
> guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging.
>
> This patchset fixes the behaviour to be more architecturally correct,
> and fixes the hangs observed.
>
> v4->v5
> * split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective so it can be reused for vSIE
> * fix existing comments and add some more comments
> * use the new split _kvm_s390_logical_to_effective in vsie_handle_mvpg
>
> v3->v4
> * added PEI_ prefix to DAT_PROT and NOT_PTE macros
> * added small comment to explain what they are about
>
> v2->v3
> * improved some comments
> * improved some variable and parameter names for increased readability
> * fixed missing handling of page faults in the MVPG handler
> * small readability improvements
>
> v1->v2
> * complete rewrite
queued (with small fixups) for kvms390. Still not sure if this will land in master or next.
Opinions?
>
> Claudio Imbrenda (3):
> s390/kvm: split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective
> s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return entry pointer
> s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE
>
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 30 ++++++++++--
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 35 ++++++++++---
> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 17:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-02 17:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] s390/kvm: split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-05 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-02 17:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return entry pointer Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-05 17:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-02 17:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-08 15:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-08 15:19 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-03-08 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix " Janosch Frank
2021-03-08 15:30 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e548903d-ed72-d84f-8010-1bb765696ffe@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox