Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Fix stsi unaligned test and add selector tests

[Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>]

On 20.09.19 09:50, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Alignment and selectors test order is not specified and so, if you
> have an unaligned address and invalid selectors it's up to the
> hypervisor to decide which error is presented.
> 
> Let's add valid selectors to the unalignmnet test and add selector
> tests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

> ---
>  s390x/stsi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
> index 7232cb0..c5bd0a2 100644
> --- a/s390x/stsi.c
> +++ b/s390x/stsi.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void test_specs(void)
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("unaligned");
>  	expect_pgm_int();
> -	stsi(pagebuf + 42, 1, 0, 0);
> +	stsi(pagebuf + 42, 1, 1, 1);
>  	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void *addr)
>  static void test_fc(void)
>  {
>  	report("invalid fc",  stsi(pagebuf, 7, 0, 0) == 3);
> +	report("invalid selector 1", stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, 1) == 3);
> +	report("invalid selector 2", stsi(pagebuf, 1, 1, 0) == 3);
>  	report("query fc >= 2",  stsi_get_fc(pagebuf) >= 2);
>  }
>  
>