From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas" <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/iucv: serialize HiperSockets receive with the socket lock
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168567@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011-b4-disp-410518f4-v1-1-753bf3258292@proton.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net/iucv: NULL pointer dereference in iucv_send_ctrl() due to race with close()
--
commit 5321e38163a4ca2968c5ea02ef28664bf3a65a46
Author: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
net/iucv: serialize HiperSockets receive with the socket lock
This commit serializes the HiperSockets receive path and recvmsg() using the
socket lock. It introduces a per-socket backlog to defer frames while the
socket is owned by a user.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260724222917.134769-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me/
> diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> index 5ba875798aa41..1fcb47a087551 100644
> --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -374,26 +377,28 @@ static void iucv_sever_path(struct sock *sk, int with_user_data)
> static int iucv_send_ctrl(struct sock *sk, u8 flags)
> {
> struct iucv_sock *iucv = iucv_sk(sk);
> - int err = 0;
> int blen;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> - u8 shutdown = 0;
> + bool force;
>
> blen = sizeof(struct af_iucv_trans_hdr) +
> LL_RESERVED_SPACE(iucv->hs_dev);
[Severity: High]
Can this code cause a regression by dereferencing a NULL iucv->hs_dev during a
concurrent close()?
If another thread concurrently calls close() on the socket,
__iucv_sock_close() runs under the socket lock and sets iucv->hs_dev to NULL:
net/iucv/af_iucv.c:__iucv_sock_close() {
...
if (iucv->hs_dev) {
dev_put(iucv->hs_dev);
iucv->hs_dev = NULL;
...
}
Meanwhile, afiucv_netdev_event() can asynchronously execute during netdev state
changes (such as NETDEV_GOING_DOWN) and call iucv_send_ctrl() without holding
lock_sock(sk):
net/iucv/af_iucv.c:afiucv_netdev_event() {
...
if (event == NETDEV_GOING_DOWN)
iucv_send_ctrl(sk, AF_IUCV_FLAG_FIN);
...
}
If this happens concurrently, evaluating LL_RESERVED_SPACE(iucv->hs_dev)
could dereference a NULL device pointer and cause a panic.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011-b4-disp-410518f4-v1-1-753bf3258292@proton.me?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 19:08 [PATCH net-next] net/iucv: serialize HiperSockets receive with the socket lock Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 19:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 19:45 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168567@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox