From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>, "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Nayna Jain" <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"Rich Felker" <dalias@libc.org>,
"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"David Teigland" <teigland@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Aring" <aahringo@redhat.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Oleksandr Tyshchenko" <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Zhihao Cheng" <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] s390/sclp_mem: Allocate struct sclp_mem dynamically and add kobject release
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 22:48:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170599@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013223946.1836757-9-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] sysfs: kobject memory leak on init error paths and group creation race
- [Medium] sysfs: missing cleanup of previously allocated kobjects in initialization loops
--
commit 191798937bad0f272b0f72f4ae28579cab8672f8
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
s390/sclp_mem: Allocate struct sclp_mem dynamically and add kobject release
sclp_init_mem() allocated a single array of struct sclp_mem with
kzalloc_objs() and registered each embedded kobject using a kobj_type
without a .release callback. Allocate each struct sclp_mem individually
with kzalloc_obj() instead and add sclp_mem_release() to free it.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
> index 78c054e26d177..40a7f92729751 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -322,36 +325,40 @@ static struct attribute_group sclp_mem_attr_group = {
> .attrs = sclp_mem_attrs,
> };
>
> -static int sclp_create_mem(struct sclp_mem *sclp_mem, struct kset *kset,
> - unsigned int id, bool config, bool memmap_on_memory)
> +static int sclp_create_mem(struct kset *kset, unsigned int id, bool config,
> + bool memmap_on_memory)
> {
> + struct sclp_mem *sclp_mem;
> int rc;
>
> + sclp_mem = kzalloc_obj(*sclp_mem);
> + if (!sclp_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> sclp_mem->memmap_on_memory = memmap_on_memory;
> sclp_mem->config = config;
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> sclp_mem->early_shadow_mapped = config;
> #endif
> sclp_mem->id = id;
> - kobject_init(&sclp_mem->kobj, &ktype);
> - rc = kobject_add(&sclp_mem->kobj, &kset->kobj, "memory%d", id);
> - if (rc)
> + rc = kobject_init_and_add(&sclp_mem->kobj, &ktype, &kset->kobj,
> + "memory%d", id);
> + if (rc) {
> + kobject_put(&sclp_mem->kobj);
> return rc;
> - return sysfs_create_group(&sclp_mem->kobj, &sclp_mem_attr_group);
> + }
> + rc = sysfs_create_group(&sclp_mem->kobj, &sclp_mem_attr_group);
[Severity: High]
Does calling sysfs_create_group() after kobject_init_and_add() in
sclp_create_mem() expose the sysfs directory to userspace before its
attributes are populated? Would it be safer to avoid this structural sysfs
race condition by assigning the attributes to ktype.default_groups instead?
> + if (rc) {
> + kobject_put(&sclp_mem->kobj);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -395,7 +401,7 @@ static int __init sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems,
> goto skip_add;
> for (addr = start; addr < start + size; addr += block_size) {
> id = addr / block_size;
> - rc = sclp_create_mem(&sclp_mems[id], kset, id, false,
> + rc = sclp_create_mem(kset, id, false,
> mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory());
> if (rc)
> break;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
If sclp_create_mem() fails and breaks out of this loop in
sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(), are the kobjects created in previous
iterations left registered? Should there be a centralized error cleanup
path to unwind and free these prior allocations?
> skip_add:
> first_rn = rn;
> num = 1;
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static int __init sclp_create_standby_mems(struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems, struct kset *kset)
> +static int __init sclp_create_standby_mems(struct kset *kset)
> {
> struct memory_increment *incr;
> int rc = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(incr, &sclp_mem_list, list) {
> if (incr->standby)
> - rc = sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(sclp_mems, kset, incr->rn);
> + rc = sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(kset, incr->rn);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> }
[Severity: High]
When sclp_create_standby_mems_merged() returns an error, this loop in
sclp_create_standby_mems() returns directly. Could this leak all the
standby kobjects that were successfully created in earlier iterations of
the loop?
> - return sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(sclp_mems, kset, 0);
> + return sclp_create_standby_mems_merged(kset, 0);
> }
>
> static int __init sclp_init_mem(void)
> {
> - const unsigned long block_size = memory_block_size_bytes();
> - unsigned int max_sclp_mems;
> - struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems;
> - struct sclp_mem_arg arg;
> struct kset *kset;
> int rc;
>
> - max_sclp_mems = roundup(sclp.rnmax * sclp.rzm, block_size) / block_size;
> - /* Allocate memory for all blocks ahead of time. */
> - sclp_mems = kzalloc_objs(struct sclp_mem, max_sclp_mems);
> - if (!sclp_mems)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> kset = kset_create_and_add("memory", NULL, firmware_kobj);
> if (!kset)
> return -ENOMEM;
> /* Initial memory is in the "configured" state already. */
> - arg.sclp_mems = sclp_mems;
> - arg.kset = kset;
> - rc = for_each_memory_block(&arg, sclp_create_configured_mem);
> + rc = for_each_memory_block(kset, sclp_create_configured_mem);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
[Severity: High]
If for_each_memory_block() encounters an error during memory block
creation in sclp_init_mem(), returning directly here leaves the previously
created kset and any successfully configured memory kobjects registered.
Does this result in a permanent memory leak of these structures?
> /* Standby memory is "deconfigured". */
> - return sclp_create_standby_mems(sclp_mems, kset);
> + return sclp_create_standby_mems(kset);
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, if sclp_create_standby_mems() fails later in sclp_init_mem(),
returning its error code directly leaves the kset and the initial
configured memory blocks leaked. Is an error handling path missing here to
clean up the kset and all child kobjects on failure?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013223946.1836757-1-irogers@google.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 22:39 [PATCH 00/11] kobject: Require explicit initialization of struct kobj_type::release Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] Compiler Attributes: Add __require_explicit_initialization macro Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 7:27 ` Christian König
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] powerpc/secvar: Add missing kobject release callback to secvar_ktype Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] sh: sq: Add missing kobject release callback to ktype_percpu_entry Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] cpufreq: Initialize kobj_type release callback in ondemand and conservative governors Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 4:24 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] ACPI: CPPC: Free cpc_desc in kobject release callback Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] dlm: Free dlm_ls " Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] xen/sys-hypervisor: Add release callback to hyp_sysfs_kobj_type Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] s390/sclp_mem: Allocate struct sclp_mem dynamically and add kobject release Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] ubifs: sysfs: Use kset_create_and_add() for ubifs_kset Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/amdkfd: Free queue in procfs_queue_type kobject release callback Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 22:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] kobject: Require explicit initialization of struct kobj_type::release Ian Rogers
2026-10-13 22:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 5:36 ` [PATCH 00/11] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170599@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox