Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: rds_wq UAF
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:10:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-180290@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atdoGiW_sHlWgOwt@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] rds: ib: skipping flush_workqueue() in rds_ib_init() causes UAF on error
- [Critical] rds: rdma: rds_rdma_init() still accesses invalid rds_wq when rds_init() fails
--

commit 1ca141aafc7f21d383b77362aeece7748105d3b9
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

rds_wq UAF

This commit replaces rds_ib_unregister_client() with
ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client) on the rds_ib_init() error path to avoid
flushing a NULL or already-destroyed rds_wq.

> diff --git a/net/rds/ib.c b/net/rds/ib.c
> index 786f39169bc14..cde2d1bfabbd1 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib.c
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ int rds_ib_init(void)
>  out_sysctl:
>  	rds_ib_sysctl_exit();
>  out_ibreg:
> -	rds_ib_unregister_client();
> +	ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client);

[Severity: Critical]
Could skipping flush_workqueue(rds_wq) here cause a use-after-free of
rds_ib_mr_wq or the rds_rdma module?

In rds_ib_init(), ib_register_client(&rds_ib_client) synchronously calls
rds_ib_add_one() for every registered InfiniBand device.

If rds_ib_add_one() fails after allocating rds_ibdev (for example at
ib_alloc_pd() or rds_ib_create_mr_pool()), its put_dev path drops the
reference count to zero and queues rds_ib_dev_free() onto rds_wq:

net/rds/ib.c:rds_ib_dev_put()
	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rds_ibdev->refcount))
		queue_work(rds_wq, &rds_ibdev->free_work);

Similarly, if rds_ib_add_one() succeeds for one or more devices and a later
step in rds_ib_init() fails (rds_ib_sysctl_init() or rds_ib_recv_init()),
ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client) calls rds_ib_remove_one() for each added
device, which also drops the final reference and queues rds_ibdev->free_work
(rds_ib_dev_free()) onto rds_wq.

Commit 24fa163a4bae74 added flush_workqueue(rds_wq) in
rds_ib_unregister_client() specifically to wait for rds_ib_dev_free() to
complete:

static void rds_ib_unregister_client(void)
{
	ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client);
	/* wait for rds_ib_dev_free() to complete */
	flush_workqueue(rds_wq);
}

Without that flush, rds_ib_init() proceeds directly to out_mr_exit and calls
rds_ib_mr_exit() -> destroy_workqueue(rds_ib_mr_wq) while rds_ib_dev_free()
is still pending or running on rds_wq and about to tear down
rds_ibdev->mr_8k_pool and rds_ibdev->mr_1m_pool (which flushes and cancels
delayed work on rds_ib_mr_wq).

In addition, when CONFIG_RDS_RDMA=m, returning from rds_ib_init() causes the
module loader to unmap rds_rdma.ko while rds_ib_dev_free() is still queued or
executing on rds_wq.

[Severity: Critical]
Also, if rds_init() has failed and destroyed rds_wq (or has not run yet so
rds_wq is NULL), doesn't rds_rdma_init() still access the invalid rds_wq even
with this change?

1. During rds_ib_init(), if an IB device is present and either
   rds_ib_add_one() fails at put_dev or ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client)
   calls rds_ib_remove_one(), rds_ib_dev_put() will still call
   queue_work(rds_wq, &rds_ibdev->free_work) on the destroyed or NULL rds_wq.

2. In rds_rdma_init(), if rds_ib_init() succeeds and rds_rdma_listen_init()
   fails, rds_ib_exit() is called, which still calls
   rds_ib_unregister_client() -> flush_workqueue(rds_wq):

net/rds/rdma_transport.c:rds_rdma_init()
	ret = rds_ib_init();
	if (ret)
		goto out;

	ret = rds_rdma_listen_init();
	if (ret)
		rds_ib_exit();

3. If rds_rdma_init() (or rds_tcp_init()) succeeds after rds_init() has
   failed and torn down RDS core resources in rds_threads_exit(), the
   transport remains registered and active callbacks will queue work onto the
   destroyed rds_wq.

>  out_mr_exit:
>  	rds_ib_mr_exit();
>  out:

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/atdoGiW_sHlWgOwt@redhat.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  1:46 [linus:master] [sysctl] 8d75c338f0: BUG:KASAN:slab-use-after-free_in_touch_wq_lockdep_map kernel test robot
2026-10-19 11:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 13:30   ` Joel Granados
2026-10-19 14:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 15:35       ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 19:52         ` Allison Henderson
2026-10-20  9:12           ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 10:51             ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 10:43           ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 11:05             ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-21  8:57               ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 13:09           ` rds_wq UAF Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-21  8:36             ` Allison Henderson
2026-10-21  9:37               ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-21 13:10             ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20  9:06         ` [linus:master] [sysctl] 8d75c338f0: BUG:KASAN:slab-use-after-free_in_touch_wq_lockdep_map Joel Granados
2026-10-20  9:24           ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20  7:55       ` Joel Granados

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-180290@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox