From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andreas Grapentin" <gra@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 16:41:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-195738@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-s390_arm64_kvm_fixups-v1-1-21c36fedd878@linux.ibm.com>
> From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
>
> The s390 arm64 vcpu struct mirrors arm64's kvm_vcpu_arch. When commit
> e64309198eda2 ("KVM: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter")
> changed the type of kvm_vcpu_arch.pause from bool to atomic_t, the merge
> into this tree missed the s390 copy, leaving it out of sync.
>
> Nothing on the s390 side accesses vcpu->arch.pause yet, so this has
> no functional effect. Align the type to keep the mirror identical to
> its arm64 counterpart.
>
> Fixes: e6c329180d1d ("KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-s390_arm64_kvm_fixups-v1-0-21c36fedd878@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 16:37 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 8:12 ` Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Declare enum vcpu_sysreg Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 8:01 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-04 9:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fix kvm_arm64 module naming consistency Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 8:07 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-04 9:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-11-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support Marc Zyngier
2026-11-04 7:59 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-05 12:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-195738@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox