Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:25:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212976@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-3-clopez@suse.de>

> change_protection() applies vma->vm_page_prot, which lacks the write bit
> for CoW and write-notified mappings. Callers set
> MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE when vma_wants_manual_pte_write_upgrade()
> returns true, so that entries that can be written without a fault, such
> as dirty PTEs in a shared mapping, are made writable right away.
> 
> For shared mappings, that function passes vma->vm_page_prot to
> vma_wants_writenotify(). Once writenotify is enabled, this protection
> lacks the write bit, while the vma_pgprot_modify() result it is compared
> against adds it back. The two never match, so vma_wants_writenotify()
> returns false before checking for soft-dirty, uffd-wp and writeback.
> 
> As a result, write-notified shmem mappings never get
> MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE. For example, commit 931298e103c2
> ("mm/userfaultfd: rely on vma->vm_page_prot in uffd_wp_range()") made
> uffd-wp unprotect set the flag so that dirty shmem PTEs become writable
> again, but this never takes effect. Unprotecting N dirty shmem pages
> still leads to N faults that only set the write bit.
> 
> This dates back to the commit in the Fixes tag, which moved the
> equivalent check in mprotect_fixup() before vma_set_page_prot().
> 
> Fix this by passing the protection recomputed from the VMA flags, as
> vma_set_page_prot() does.
> 
> Note: this only affects performance, as the next write fault restores
> the write bit anyway.
> 
> Fixes: 64e455079e1b ("mm: softdirty: enable write notifications on VMAs after VM_SOFTDIRTY cleared")
> Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@suse.de>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 14:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 20:47   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty() Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/huge_memory: honor MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE in change_huge_pud() Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:58   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:48   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm: keep writable entries writable on protection changes Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:56   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/mprotect: add MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:51   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:37   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: pass the mmu_notifier event and flags to kvm_gfn_range Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: s390: don't unmap the gmap " Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU " David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:32   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212976@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clopez@suse.de \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox