From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas" <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 3/3] net/smc: skip the DMB nocopy accounting until the send buffer is set
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 00:33:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213929@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-b4-disp-1c8d3a53-v6-3-36a38ae35021@proton.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] net/smc: cursor and sndbuf_space corruption in
smc_cdc_msg_recv_action()
--
commit e0b814dd8c52ebec88e4c2f0e2ec1ede28947bff
Author: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
net/smc: skip the DMB nocopy accounting until the send buffer is set
This commit publishes conn->sndbuf_desc with smp_store_release() in
smcd_buf_attach() and skips the SMC-D DMB nocopy accounting in
smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() when conn->sndbuf_desc is still NULL.
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
> index b3bcc206efe3e..4a4a279b405b1 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv_action(struct smc_sock *smc,
> union smc_host_cursor cons_old, prod_old;
> struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
> int diff_cons, diff_prod, diff_tx;
> + struct smc_buf_desc *sndbuf_desc;
>
> /* smc_conn_create() can have cleared rmb_desc */
> if (!smp_load_acquire(&conn->rmb_desc))
> @@ -357,12 +358,19 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv_action(struct smc_sock *smc,
> * peer RMB, then update tx_curs_fin and sndbuf_space
> * here since peer has already consumed the data.
> */
> + sndbuf_desc = NULL;
> if (conn->lgr->is_smcd &&
> smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy(conn->lgr->smcd)) {
> + /* NULL until smcd_buf_attach(), but the old peer of
> + * a reused DMB can already signal us.
> + */
> + sndbuf_desc = smp_load_acquire(&conn->sndbuf_desc);
> + }
> + if (sndbuf_desc) {
> /* Calculate consumed data and
> * increment free send buffer space.
> */
> - diff_tx = smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_desc->len,
> + diff_tx = smc_curs_diff(sndbuf_desc->len,
> &conn->tx_curs_fin,
> &conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons);
> /* increase local sndbuf space and fin_curs */
[Severity: High]
Does skipping the if (sndbuf_desc) block while still applying
conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons desynchronize conn->tx_curs_fin from
conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons and corrupt conn->sndbuf_space?
When a CDC message from the old peer of a reused DMB arrives before
smcd_buf_attach() with a non-zero consumer cursor, smc_cdc_msg_to_host()
advances conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons (and adds diff_cons to
conn->peer_rmbe_space, which smc_conn_save_peer_info() already set to
conn->peer_rmbe_size), while skipping the if (sndbuf_desc) block leaves
conn->tx_curs_fin at {0, 0}.
smcd_buf_attach() then initializes conn->sndbuf_space to the full
buf_desc->len without resetting conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons or matching
conn->tx_curs_fin to it. Because diff_tx is computed against
conn->tx_curs_fin rather than cons_old:
net/smc/smc_cdc.c:smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() {
...
diff_tx = smc_curs_diff(sndbuf_desc->len,
&conn->tx_curs_fin,
&conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons);
/* increase local sndbuf space and fin_curs */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_add(diff_tx, &conn->sndbuf_space);
/* guarantee 0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len */
smp_mb__after_atomic();
smc_curs_copy(&conn->tx_curs_fin,
&conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons, conn);
...
}
any later consumer update that advances past the pre-attach cursor still
credits the pre-attach delta on top of buf_desc->len, pushing
conn->sndbuf_space above sndbuf_desc->len and letting smc_tx_sendmsg()
overwrite unconsumed data or write past the end of the buffer. Conversely,
when the new peer sends consumer updates at or below the stale
conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons, smc_curs_diff() returns 0 and never credits
conn->peer_rmbe_space or conn->sndbuf_space, stalling transmission.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-b4-disp-1c8d3a53-v6-0-36a38ae35021@proton.me?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 0:32 [PATCH net v6 0/3] net/smc: order the CDC receive path against buffer publication Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 0:32 ` [PATCH net v6 1/3] net/smc: order the CDC receive path against RMB publication Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-11-14 0:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 0:32 ` [PATCH net v6 2/3] net/smc: clear the buffer pointers before registering a connection Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-11-14 0:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 0:32 ` [PATCH net v6 3/3] net/smc: skip the DMB nocopy accounting until the send buffer is set Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-11-14 0:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213929@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox