public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:45:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xhsmhfsehy706.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3ZBUMteJysc1/lA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 17/11/22 15:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:33:36PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> *yuck*

:-)

>
> How about something like so?
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>
>  #include <trace/events/ipi.h>
>
> +#include "sched/smp.h"
> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, raised_list);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, lazy_list);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, irq_workd);
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3763,16 +3763,17 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg)
>       rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>  }
>
> -void send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
> +bool send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
>  {
>       struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
>       if (!set_nr_if_polling(rq->idle)) {
> -		trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, NULL);
>               arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> -	} else {
> -		trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
> +		return true;
>       }
> +
> +	trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
> +	return false;
>  }
>
>  /*
> --- a/kernel/sched/smp.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/smp.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>
>  extern void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg);
>
> -extern void send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
> +extern bool send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  extern void flush_smp_call_function_queue(void);
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@ void __init call_function_init(void)
>  static inline void
>  send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
> -	trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_, func);
>       arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(mask);
>  }
>
> @@ -438,11 +437,16 @@ static void __smp_call_single_queue_debu
>       struct cfd_seq_local *seq = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_seq_local);
>       struct call_function_data *cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
>       struct cfd_percpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->pcpu, cpu);
> +	struct __call_single_data *csd;
> +
> +	csd = container_of(node, call_single_data_t, node.llist);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(CSD_TYPE(csd) & (CSD_TYPE_SYNC | CSD_TYPE_ASYNC)));
>
>       cfd_seq_store(pcpu->seq_queue, this_cpu, cpu, CFD_SEQ_QUEUE);
>       if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu))) {
>               cfd_seq_store(pcpu->seq_ipi, this_cpu, cpu, CFD_SEQ_IPI);
>               cfd_seq_store(seq->ping, this_cpu, cpu, CFD_SEQ_PING);
> +		trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, csd->func);
>               send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
>               cfd_seq_store(seq->pinged, this_cpu, cpu, CFD_SEQ_PINGED);
>       } else {
> @@ -487,6 +491,27 @@ static __always_inline void csd_unlock(s
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(call_single_data_t, csd_data);
>
> +static __always_inline
> +bool raw_smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
> +	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
> +	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
> +	 * llist ops.
> +	 *
> +	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
> +	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
> +	 * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
> +	 * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
> +	 * equipped to do the right thing...
> +	 */
> +	if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
> +		return send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG
> @@ -503,19 +528,28 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, st
>  #endif
>
>       /*
> -	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
> -	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
> -	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
> -	 * llist ops.
> -	 *
> -	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
> -	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
> -	 * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
> -	 * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
> -	 * equipped to do the right thing...
> -	 */
> -	if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
> -		send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> +	 * We have to check the type of the CSD before queueing it, because
> +	 * once queued it can have its flags cleared by
> +	 *   flush_smp_call_function_queue()
> +	 * even if we haven't sent the smp_call IPI yet (e.g. the stopper
> +	 * executes migration_cpu_stop() on the remote CPU).
> +	 */
> +	if (trace_ipi_send_cpumask_enabled()) {
> +		call_single_data_t *csd;
> +		smp_call_func_t func;
> +
> +		csd = container_of(node, call_single_data_t, node.llist);
> +
> +		func = sched_ttwu_pending;
> +		if (CSD_TYPE(csd) != CSD_TYPE_TTWU)
> +			func = csd->func;
> +
> +		if (raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node))
> +			trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, func);

So I went with the tracepoint being placed *before* the actual IPI gets
sent to have a somewhat sane ordering between trace_ipi_send_cpumask() and
e.g. trace_call_function_single_entry().

Packaging the call_single_queue logic makes the code less horrible, but it
does mix up the event ordering...


> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node);
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -983,10 +1017,13 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
>                * number of CPUs might be zero due to concurrent changes to the
>                * provided mask.
>                */
> -		if (nr_cpus == 1)
> +		if (nr_cpus == 1) {
> +			trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(last_cpu), _RET_IP_, func);
>                       send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu);

This'll yield an IPI event even if no IPI is sent due to the idle task
polling, no?

> -		else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1))
> -			send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
> +		} else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1)) {
> +			trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_, func);
> +			send_call_function_ipi_mask(mask);
> +		}
>
>               cfd_seq_store(this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_seq_local)->pinged, this_cpu, CFD_SEQ_NOCPU, CFD_SEQ_PINGED);
>       }


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-02 18:29 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] DO-NOT-MERGE: tracing: Add __cpumask to denote a trace event field that is a cpumask_t Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] smp: Trace IPIs sent via arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:23     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] treewide: Trace IPIs sent via smp_send_reschedule() Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17  9:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] smp: reword smp call IPI comment Valentin Schneider
2022-11-02 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI Valentin Schneider
2022-11-17 14:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-17 14:45     ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2022-11-18  9:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-18 16:42         ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2022-11-14 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xhsmhfsehy706.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb \
    --to=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox