* [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: S5PV210: CPUFREQ Initial Support
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
S5PV210 CPUFREQ Initial Support.
This is a series of patches to enable CPUFREQ for S5PV210.
Although this works without PMIC's DVS support, it is not
as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not
supported in this version.
MyungJoo Ham (7):
ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required.
ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210
cpu-freq
ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz
ARM: S5P: Virtual Addresses for DMCx registers.
ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers
ARM: S5PV210: macros for clock registers at regs-clock.h
ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 5 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c | 45 ++-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c | 783 +++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h | 40 ++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h | 4 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 45 ++-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c | 4 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 3 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 3 +
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h | 6 +
13 files changed, 939 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
--
v2:
- Ramp-up delay is removed. (let regulator framework do the job)
- Provide proper max values for regulator_set_voltage
- Removed unneccesary #ifdef's.
- Removed unnecessary initialiser for CLK_OUT
v3:
- Style corrections (pr_info/pr_err, ...)
- Revised dvs_conf struct
v4:
- Renamed cpufreq-s5pv210.c -> cpufreq.c
- Style corrections (less #ifdef's, comments)
- Removed unncessary codes
- Remove #ifdef for WORKAROUND, use s5pv210_workaround()
- Renamed some static variables (get rid of s5pv210 prefix)
- Added machine dependency to Kconfig/Makefile
- DMC0, DMC1 refresh counter is not updated by a hardcoded value, but
with the value given as the default and relative clock speeds. Besides,
the algorithm to update DMC0/1 refresh counter is reformed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required.
2010-07-22 9:22 [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: S5PV210: CPUFREQ Initial Support MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210 cpu-freq MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-26 4:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
Early products of S5PV210 had several errata that require kernel to
avoid using some parts/instructions of the CPU or to add protection
instructions. There are products with such early production CPUs;
thus, we want to distinguish them in kernel. This patch is to
distinguish such products.
Include <mach/hardware.h> and call s5pv210_workaround()
For example,
if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
... execute workaround code ...
} else {
... execute normal code ...
}
Where we can identify whether such workaround codes are required or not,
call set_s5pv210_workaround_required() is it's needed. Note that in this
system, it can be identified at board support file
(arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-*.c), not at the cpe file
(arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c). It is because we cannot determine based
on the CPU_ID or PRODUCT_ID only; board revision number is required to
determine.
For Aquila machine. (mach-aquila.c)
Part of Aquila machines have the early production CPUs that require
to address errata issues. Note that we don't do this for GONI machines
because they have never used early production CPUs with errata. Besides,
please note that there are other boards that use such early produces
other than Aquila. However, those boards/machines are not registered at
the /linux/arch/arm/tools/mach-types, yet; thus, we have omitted them
in this patch.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c | 4 +++
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
index 94c632b..b9fe38e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
+#include <asm/mach-types.h>
#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
#include <mach/map.h>
#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
@@ -128,6 +129,38 @@ static struct sys_device s5pv210_sysdev = {
.cls = &s5pv210_sysclass,
};
+/* See if workaround to avoid errata of earlier revisions */
+static bool s5pv210_workaround_required;
+
+bool s5pv210_workaround(void)
+{
+ return s5pv210_workaround_required;
+}
+
+void set_s5pv210_workaround(unsigned int board_rev)
+{
+ s5pv210_workaround_required = false;
+
+ if (machine_is_aquila()) {
+ if (board_rev & 0x0800) {
+ if ((board_rev & 0xF) < 8)
+ s5pv210_workaround_required = true;
+ } else if (board_rev & 0x2000) {
+ s5pv210_workaround_required = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When machine_is_goni(), always false
+ *
+ * When machine_arch_number is 3260 and board_rev&0xF is 5,
+ * always true. But, omitted as it's not registered at
+ * mach_types, yet.
+ * When machine_arch_number is 3104 and board_rev&0xF is 0,
+ * always true, as well. Omitted by the same reason.
+ */
+}
+
static int __init s5pv210_core_init(void)
{
return sysdev_class_register(&s5pv210_sysclass);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
index fada7a3..0c41852 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H
#define __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H __FILE__
-/* currently nothing here, placeholder */
+extern bool s5pv210_workaround(void);
+extern void set_s5pv210_workaround(unsigned int);
#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
index 46d5c7e..85024af 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
#include <mach/regs-fb.h>
#include <mach/gpio.h>
+#include <mach/hardware.h>
#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
#include <plat/regs-serial.h>
@@ -536,6 +537,9 @@ static void __init aquila_map_io(void)
static void __init aquila_machine_init(void)
{
+ /* Determine whether we need workaround codes */
+ set_s5pv210_workaround(system_rev);
+
/* PMIC */
aquila_pmic_init();
i2c_register_board_info(AP_I2C_GPIO_PMIC_BUS_4, i2c_gpio_pmic_devs,
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210 cpu-freq
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-26 4:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required Kukjin Kim
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
S5PV210 requires msys/dsys info as well; thus, we've included those at
struct s3c_freq, which is used by CPUFREQ of S5PV210.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h
index 80c4a80..9e97df7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu-freq.h
@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ struct s3c_freq {
unsigned long hclk_tns; /* in 10ths of ns */
unsigned long hclk;
unsigned long pclk;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210
+ unsigned long hclk_msys;
+ unsigned long pclk_msys;
+ unsigned long hclk_dsys;
+ unsigned long pclk_dsys;
+#endif
};
/**
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210 cpu-freq MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: S5P: Virtual Addresses for DMCx registers MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings according to
different CPU frequencies. We provide such settings values for
CPUFREQ at pll.h.
Note that at 1GHz of ARMCLK, APLL should be 1GHz and for other lower
ARMCLK, APLL should be 800MHz.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
index 7db3227..d79042a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
#include <asm/div64.h>
+#define PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_1000 ((1 << 31) | (125<<16) | (3<<8) | (1))
+#define PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_800 ((1 << 31) | (100<<16) | (3<<8) | (1))
+
enum pll45xx_type_t {
pll_4500,
pll_4502,
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: S5P: Virtual Addresses for DMCx registers.
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access " MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We
define virtual addresses of DMCx registers.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h
index 1482852..bd803f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h
@@ -31,4 +31,7 @@
#define VA_VIC2 VA_VIC(2)
#define VA_VIC3 VA_VIC(3)
+#define S5P_VA_DMC0 S3C_ADDR(0x00a00000)
+#define S5P_VA_DMC1 S3C_ADDR(0x00b00000)
+
#endif /* __ASM_PLAT_MAP_S5P_H */
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: S5P: Virtual Addresses for DMCx registers MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: S5PV210: macros for clock registers at regs-clock.h MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We
define physical addresses and mapping between physical and virtual
addresses of DMCx registers.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c | 12 +++++++++++-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
index b9fe38e..633ca8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
@@ -60,7 +60,17 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = {
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SROMC),
.length = SZ_4K,
.type = MT_DEVICE,
- }
+ }, {
+ .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_DMC0,
+ .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_DMC0),
+ .length = SZ_4K,
+ .type = MT_DEVICE,
+ }, {
+ .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_DMC1,
+ .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_DMC1),
+ .length = SZ_4K,
+ .type = MT_DEVICE,
+ },
};
static void s5pv210_idle(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h
index 17687f0..daf6456 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/map.h
@@ -108,4 +108,8 @@
#define SAMSUNG_PA_ADC S5PV210_PA_ADC
#define SAMSUNG_PA_KEYPAD S5PV210_PA_KEYPAD
+/* DMC */
+#define S5PV210_PA_DMC0 (0xF0000000)
+#define S5PV210_PA_DMC1 (0xF1400000)
+
#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MAP_H */
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: S5PV210: macros for clock registers at regs-clock.h
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access " MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
those shift and mask values as well, we'd better define them at a single
location, whose proper location would be regs-clock.h.
Note that only the information about registers used by CPUFREQ are
defined. However, we may need to define other registers later if we add
other parts.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h
index 2a25ab4..a117ecc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/regs-clock.h
@@ -66,11 +66,30 @@
#define S5P_CLKGATE_BUS0 S5P_CLKREG(0x484)
#define S5P_CLKGATE_BUS1 S5P_CLKREG(0x488)
#define S5P_CLK_OUT S5P_CLKREG(0x500)
+#define S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0 S5P_CLKREG(0x1000)
+#define S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT1 S5P_CLKREG(0x1004)
+#define S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0 S5P_CLKREG(0x1100)
+#define S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1 S5P_CLKREG(0x1104)
+
+#define S5P_ARM_MCS_CON S5P_CLKREG(0x6100)
/* CLKSRC0 */
-#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK (0x1<<16)
-#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX166_MASK (0x1<<20)
-#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX133_MASK (0x1<<24)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_APLL_MASK (0x1 << 0)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_APLL_SHIFT (0)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MPLL_MASK (0x1 << 4)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MPLL_SHIFT (4)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_EPLL_MASK (0x1 << 8)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_EPLL_SHIFT (8)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_VPLL_MASK (0x1 << 12)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_VPLL_SHIFT (12)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK (0x1 << 16)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT (16)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX166_MASK (0x1 << 20)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX166_SHIFT (20)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX133_MASK (0x1 << 24)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX133_SHIFT (24)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_ONENAND_MASK (0x1 << 28)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC0_ONENAND_SHIFT (28)
/* CLKDIV0 */
#define S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_SHIFT (0)
@@ -90,6 +109,26 @@
#define S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT (28)
#define S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_MASK (0x7 << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT)
+/* CLKSRC2 */
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK (0x3 << 0)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT (0)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK (0x3 << 4)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT (4)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK (0x3 << 8)
+#define S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT (8)
+
+/* CLKDIV2 */
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK (0xF << 0)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT (0)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK (0xF << 4)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT (4)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK (0xF << 8)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT (8)
+
+/* CLKDIV6 */
+#define S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK (0xf<<28)
+#define S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT (28)
+
/* Registers related to power management */
#define S5P_PWR_CFG S5P_CLKREG(0xC000)
#define S5P_EINT_WAKEUP_MASK S5P_CLKREG(0xC004)
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: S5PV210: macros for clock registers at regs-clock.h MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 9:22 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-26 4:54 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-22 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim, myungjoo.ham,
ben-linux
S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
this version.
Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC,
and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating clksrc_src
representations of the clocks. Because CPUFREQ reverts the CLK_SRC
to the supposed values, this does not affect the consistency as long as
there are no other modules that modifies clock sources of ARMCLK, G3D,
G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM (and only CPUFREQ should have the control). As
soon as clock framework is settled, we may update source clocks
(.parent field) of those clocks accordingly later.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
--
v2:
- Ramp-up delay is removed. (let regulator framework do the job)
- Provide proper max values for regulator_set_voltage
- Removed unneccesary #ifdef's.
- Removed unnecessary initialiser for CLK_OUT
v3:
- Style corrections (pr_info/pr_err, ...)
- Revised dvs_conf struct
v4:
- Renamed cpufreq-s5pv210.c -> cpufreq.c
- Style corrections (less #ifdef's, comments)
- Removed unncessary codes
- Remove #ifdef for WORKAROUND, use s5pv210_workaround()
- Renamed some static variables (get rid of s5pv210 prefix)
- Added machine dependency to Kconfig/Makefile
- DMC0, DMC1 refresh counter is not updated by a hardcoded value, but
with the value given as the default and relative clock speeds. Besides,
the algorithm to update DMC0/1 refresh counter is reformed.
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 5 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c | 783 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h | 40 ++
5 files changed, 831 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 98922f7..d5a5916 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ config ARCH_S5PV210
select HAVE_CLK
select ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6
select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
+ select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
help
Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 series based systems
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
index 631019a..1c6d3bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config CPU_S5PV210
select PLAT_S5P
select S3C_PL330_DMA
select S5P_EXT_INT
+ select S5PV210_CPU_FREQ if CPU_FREQ
help
Enable S5PV210 CPU support
@@ -101,4 +102,8 @@ config MACH_SMDKC110
Machine support for Samsung SMDKC110
S5PC110(MCP) is one of package option of S5PV210
+config S5PV210_CPU_FREQ
+ bool "S5PV210 CPU-FREQ Support"
+ depends on CPU_S5PV210 && CPU_FREQ
+
endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
index aae592a..72ca5ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
@@ -34,3 +34,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_I2C2) += setup-i2c2.o
obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o
obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI) += setup-sdhci.o
obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_CPU_FREQ) += cpufreq.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8ea1ce8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
@@ -0,0 +1,783 @@
+/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *
+ * CPU frequency scaling for S5PV210/S5PC110
+ * Based on cpu-sa1110.c and s5pc11x-cpufreq.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+
+#include <mach/hardware.h>
+#include <mach/map.h>
+#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
+#include <mach/regs-gpio.h>
+#include <mach/cpu-freq.h>
+
+#include <plat/cpu-freq.h>
+#include <plat/pll.h>
+#include <plat/clock.h>
+#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
+#include <plat/regs-fb.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#include <plat/pm.h>
+#endif
+
+static struct clk *mpu_clk;
+static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
+static struct regulator *internal_regulator;
+
+struct s3c_cpufreq_freqs s3c_freqs;
+
+static unsigned long previous_arm_volt;
+
+static unsigned int backup_dmc0_reg;
+static unsigned int backup_dmc1_reg;
+static unsigned int backup_freq_level;
+static unsigned int mpll_freq; /* in MHz */
+static unsigned int apll_freq_max; /* in MHz */
+
+/* frequency */
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
+ {L0, 1000*1000},
+ {L1, 800*1000},
+ {L2, 400*1000},
+ {L3, 200*1000},
+ {L4, 100*1000},
+ {0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
+};
+
+struct s5pv210_dvs_conf {
+ unsigned long arm_volt; /* uV */
+ unsigned long int_volt; /* uV */
+};
+
+const unsigned long arm_volt_max = 1350000;
+const unsigned long int_volt_max = 1250000;
+
+static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_workaround[] = {
+ [L0] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1300000,
+ .int_volt = 1200000,
+ },
+ [L1] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1250000,
+ .int_volt = 1200000,
+
+ },
+ [L2] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1250000,
+ .int_volt = 1200000,
+
+ },
+ [L3] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1250000,
+ .int_volt = 1200000,
+ },
+ [L4] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1250000,
+ .int_volt = 1200000,
+ },
+};
+static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_default[] = {
+ [L0] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1250000,
+ .int_volt = 1100000,
+ },
+ [L1] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1200000,
+ .int_volt = 1100000,
+ },
+ [L2] = {
+ .arm_volt = 1050000,
+ .int_volt = 1100000,
+ },
+ [L3] = {
+ .arm_volt = 950000,
+ .int_volt = 1100000,
+ },
+ [L4] = {
+ .arm_volt = 950000,
+ .int_volt = 1000000,
+ },
+};
+static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf *dvs_conf = dvs_conf_default;
+
+static u32 clkdiv_val[5][11] = {
+ /*{ APLL, A2M, HCLK_MSYS, PCLK_MSYS,
+ * HCLK_DSYS, PCLK_DSYS, HCLK_PSYS, PCLK_PSYS, ONEDRAM,
+ * MFC, G3D }
+ */
+ /* L0 : [1000/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
+ {0, 4, 4, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
+ /* L1 : [800/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
+ {0, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
+ /* L2 : [400/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
+ {1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
+ /* L3 : [200/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
+ {3, 3, 0, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
+ /* L4 : [100/100/100/100][83/83][66/66][100/100] */
+ {7, 7, 0, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, 7, 0, 0},
+};
+
+static struct s3c_freq clk_info[] = {
+ [L0] = { /* L0: 1GHz */
+ .fclk = 1000000,
+ .armclk = 1000000,
+ .hclk_tns = 0,
+ .hclk = 133000,
+ .pclk = 66000,
+ .hclk_msys = 200000,
+ .pclk_msys = 100000,
+ .hclk_dsys = 166750,
+ .pclk_dsys = 83375,
+ },
+ [L1] = { /* L1: 800MHz */
+ .fclk = 800000,
+ .armclk = 800000,
+ .hclk_tns = 0,
+ .hclk = 133000,
+ .pclk = 66000,
+ .hclk_msys = 200000,
+ .pclk_msys = 100000,
+ .hclk_dsys = 166750,
+ .pclk_dsys = 83375,
+ },
+ [L2] = { /* L2: 400MHz */
+ .fclk = 800000,
+ .armclk = 400000,
+ .hclk_tns = 0,
+ .hclk = 133000,
+ .pclk = 66000,
+ .hclk_msys = 200000,
+ .pclk_msys = 100000,
+ .hclk_dsys = 166750,
+ .pclk_dsys = 83375,
+ },
+ [L3] = { /* L3: 200MHz */
+ .fclk = 800000,
+ .armclk = 200000,
+ .hclk_tns = 0,
+ .hclk = 133000,
+ .pclk = 66000,
+ .hclk_msys = 200000,
+ .pclk_msys = 100000,
+ .hclk_dsys = 166750,
+ .pclk_dsys = 83375,
+ },
+ [L4] = { /* L4: 100MHz */
+ .fclk = 800000,
+ .armclk = 100000,
+ .hclk_tns = 0,
+ .hclk = 66000,
+ .pclk = 66000,
+ .hclk_msys = 100000,
+ .pclk_msys = 100000,
+ .hclk_dsys = 83375,
+ .pclk_dsys = 83375,
+ },
+};
+
+static int s5pv210_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+
+ if (policy->cpu)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table);
+}
+
+static unsigned int s5pv210_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long rate;
+
+ if (cpu)
+ return 0;
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk) / 1000;
+
+ return rate;
+}
+
+static void s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(unsigned int index,
+ unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
+{
+ unsigned int reg;
+
+ /*
+ * 1. Temporarily change divider for MFC and G3D
+ * SCLKA2M(200/1=200)->(200/4=50)MHz
+ */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
+ reg |= (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
+ (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
+ if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
+ /*
+ * Early version does NOT have G2D
+ * Do Nothing about G2D.
+ */
+ } else {
+ reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
+ reg |= (0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT);
+ }
+
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+
+ /* For MFC, G3D dividing */
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
+ } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
+
+ /*
+ * 2. Change SCLKA2M(200MHz) to SCLKMPLL in MFC_MUX, G3D MUX
+ * (100/4=50)->(667/4=166)MHz
+ */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
+ reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
+ (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
+ if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
+ /*
+ * Early version does NOT have G2D
+ * Do Nothing about G2D.
+ */
+ } else {
+ reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
+ reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT);
+ }
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
+ } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
+
+ /* 3. msys: SCLKAPLL -> SCLKMPLL */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
+ reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
+ } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
+}
+
+static void s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(unsigned int index,
+ unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
+{
+ unsigned int reg;
+
+ /*
+ * 7. Set Lock time = 30us*24MHz = 02cf (EVT1)
+ * WORKAROUND: Lock time = 300us*24Mhz = 7200(0x1c20)
+ * Normal: Lock time = 30us*24Mhz = 0x2cf
+ */
+ if (s5pv210_workaround())
+ __raw_writel(0x1c20, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
+ else
+ __raw_writel(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
+
+ /*
+ * 8. Turn on APLL
+ * 8-1. Set PMS values
+ * 8-3. Wait until the PLL is locked
+ */
+ if (index == L0)
+ /* APLL FOUT becomes 1000 Mhz */
+ __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
+ else
+ /* APLL FOUT becomes 800 Mhz */
+ __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_APLL_CON);
+ } while (!(reg & (0x1 << 29)));
+
+ /*
+ * 9. Change source clock from SCLKMPLL(667MHz)
+ * to SCLKA2M(200MHz) in MFC_MUX and G3D_MUX
+ * (667/4=166)->(200/4=50)MHz
+ */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
+ reg |= (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) | (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
+ if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
+ /*
+ * Early version does NOT have G2D
+ * Do Nothing about G2D.
+ */
+ } else {
+ reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
+ reg |= 0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT;
+ }
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
+ } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
+
+ /*
+ * 10. Change divider for MFC and G3D
+ * (200/4=50)->(200/1=200)MHz
+ */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
+ reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][10] << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
+ (clkdiv_val[index][9] << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
+ if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
+ /*
+ * Early version does NOT have G2D
+ * Do Nothing about G2D.
+ */
+ } else {
+ reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
+ reg |= 0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT;
+ }
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
+ } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
+
+ /* 11. Change MPLL to APLL in MSYS_MUX */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
+ reg |= (0x0 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT); /* SCLKMPLL -> SCLKAPLL */
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
+ } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int no_cpufreq_access;
+/*
+ * s5pv210_target: relation has an additional symantics other than
+ * the standard
+ * [0x30]:
+ * 1: disable further access to target until being re-enabled.
+ * 2: re-enable access to target */
+#endif
+static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq,
+ unsigned int relation)
+{
+ static int initialized;
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long arm_clk;
+ unsigned int index, reg, arm_volt, int_volt;
+ unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
+ unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
+
+ cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
+ "cpufreq: Entering for %dkHz\n", target_freq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ if ((relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ) &&
+ (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)) {
+ /* Invalidate both if both marked */
+ relation &= ~ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
+ relation &= ~DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
+ pr_err("%s:%d denied marking \"FURTHER_CPUFREQ\""
+ " as both marked.\n",
+ __FILE__, __LINE__);
+ }
+ if (relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
+ no_cpufreq_access = 0;
+ if (no_cpufreq_access == 1) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
+ pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
+ " temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
+#endif
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
+ no_cpufreq_access = 1;
+ relation &= ~MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
+#endif
+
+ s3c_freqs.freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+
+ if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
+ target_freq, relation, &index)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ arm_clk = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ s3c_freqs.freqs.new = arm_clk;
+ s3c_freqs.freqs.cpu = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Run this function unconditionally until s3c_freqs.freqs.new
+ * and s3c_freqs.freqs.old are both set by this function.
+ */
+ if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new == s3c_freqs.freqs.old &&
+ initialized >= 2)
+ return 0;
+ else if (initialized < 2)
+ initialized++;
+
+ arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
+ int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
+
+ /* iNew clock information update */
+ memcpy(&s3c_freqs.new, &clk_info[index],
+ sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
+
+ if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new >= s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
+ /* Voltage up code: increase ARM first */
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
+ !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
+ regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
+ arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
+ regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
+ int_volt, int_volt_max);
+ }
+ }
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+
+ if (s3c_freqs.new.fclk != s3c_freqs.old.fclk || initialized < 2)
+ pll_changing = 1;
+
+ if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys != s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys ||
+ initialized < 2)
+ bus_speed_changing = 1;
+
+ /*
+ * If ONEDRAM(DMC0)'s clock is getting slower, DMC0's
+ * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
+ * DMC0 clock. We assume that DMC0's source clock never
+ * changes. This is a temporary setting for the transition.
+ * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
+ */
+ reg = (__raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6) & S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK)
+ >> S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT;
+ if (clkdiv_val[index][8] > reg) {
+ reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (reg + 1) / (clkdiv_val[index][8] + 1);
+ WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
+ reg &= 0xFFFF;
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If hclk_msys (for DMC1) is getting slower, DMC1's
+ * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
+ * hclk_msys in order to get rid of glitches in the
+ * transition. This is temporary setting for the transition.
+ * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
+ *
+ * Besides, we need to consider the case when PLL speed changes,
+ * where the DMC1's source clock hclk_msys is changed from ARMCLK
+ * to MPLL temporarily. DMC1 needs to be ready for this
+ * transition as well.
+ */
+ if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys < s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys) {
+ /*
+ * hclk_msys is up to 12bit. (200000)
+ * reg is 16bit. so no overflow, yet.
+ *
+ * May need to use div64.h later with larger hclk_msys or
+ * DMCx refresh counter. But, we have bugs in do_div and
+ * that should be fixed before.
+ */
+ reg = backup_dmc1_reg * s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys;
+ reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
+
+ /*
+ * When ARM_CLK is absed on APLL->MPLL,
+ * hclk_msys becomes hclk_msys *= MPLL/APLL;
+ *
+ * Based on the worst case scenario, we use MPLL/APLL_MAX
+ * assuming that MPLL clock speed does not change.
+ *
+ * Multiplied first in order to reduce rounding error.
+ * because reg has 15b length, using 64b should be enough to
+ * prevent overflow.
+ */
+ if (pll_changing) {
+ reg *= mpll_freq;
+ reg /= apll_freq_max;
+ }
+ WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
+ __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * APLL should be changed in this level
+ * APLL -> MPLL(for stable transition) -> APLL
+ * Some clock source's clock API are not prepared. Do not use clock API
+ * in below code.
+ */
+ if (pll_changing)
+ s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
+
+ /* ARM MCS value changed */
+ if (index != L4) {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ reg &= ~0x3;
+ reg |= 0x1;
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ }
+
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
+
+ reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_MASK
+ | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_MASK
+ | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_MASK
+ | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_MASK);
+
+ reg |= ((clkdiv_val[index][0]<<S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][1] << S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][2] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][3] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][4] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][5] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][6] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_SHIFT)
+ | (clkdiv_val[index][7] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT));
+
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
+
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
+ } while (reg & 0xff);
+
+ /* ARM MCS value changed */
+ if (index == L4) {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ reg &= ~0x3;
+ reg |= 0x3;
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ }
+
+ if (pll_changing)
+ s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
+
+ /*
+ * Adjust DMC0 refresh ratio according to the rate of DMC0
+ * The DIV value of DMC0 clock changes and SRC value is not controlled.
+ * We assume that no one changes SRC value of DMC0 clock, either.
+ */
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
+ reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK;
+ reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][8] << S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT);
+ /* ONEDRAM(DMC0) Clock Divider Ratio: 7+1 for L4, 3+1 for Others */
+ __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
+ do {
+ reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT1);
+ } while (reg & (1 << 15));
+
+ /*
+ * If DMC0 clock gets slower (by orginal clock speed / n),
+ * then, the refresh rate should decrease
+ * (by original refresh count / n) (n: divider)
+ */
+ reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (clkdiv_val[backup_freq_level][8] + 1)
+ / (clkdiv_val[index][8] + 1);
+ __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
+
+ /*
+ * Adjust DMC1 refresh ratio according to the rate of hclk_msys
+ * (L0~L3: 200 <-> L4: 100)
+ * If DMC1 clock gets slower (by original clock speed * n),
+ * then, the refresh rate should decrease
+ * (by original refresh count * n) (n : clock rate)
+ */
+ reg = backup_dmc1_reg * clk_info[index].hclk_msys;
+ reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
+ __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
+
+ if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new < s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
+ /* Voltage down: decrease INT first.*/
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
+ !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
+ regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
+ int_volt, int_volt_max);
+ regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
+ arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
+ }
+ }
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+
+ memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &s3c_freqs.new, sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
+ cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
+ "cpufreq: Performance changed[L%d]\n", index);
+ previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
+out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int previous_frequency;
+
+static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ pm_message_t pmsg)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ pr_info("cpufreq: Entering suspend.\n");
+
+ previous_frequency = cpufreq_get(0);
+ ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
+ DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int s5pv210_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ u32 rate;
+ int level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+ int i;
+
+ pr_info("cpufreq: Waking up from a suspend.\n");
+
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), previous_frequency,
+ ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
+
+ /* Clock information update with wakeup value */
+ rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
+
+ i = 0;
+ while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
+ if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
+ level = freq_table[i].index;
+ break;
+ }
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
+ pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
+ "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
+ level = L1;
+ }
+
+ memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
+ sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
+ previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int __init s5pv210_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ u32 rate ;
+ int i, level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+ struct clk *mpll_clk;
+
+ pr_info("S5PV210 CPUFREQ Initialising...\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ no_cpufreq_access = 0;
+#endif
+ mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk)) {
+ pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get armclk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
+ }
+
+ if (policy->cpu != 0) {
+ pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get proper cpu(%d)\n",
+ policy->cpu);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+
+ cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
+
+ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 40000; /* 1us */
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
+ i = 0;
+
+ while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
+ if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
+ level = freq_table[i].index;
+ break;
+ }
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
+ pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
+ "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
+ level = L1;
+ }
+
+ backup_dmc0_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
+ backup_dmc1_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
+ backup_freq_level = level;
+ mpll_clk = clk_get(NULL, "mout_mpll");
+ mpll_freq = clk_get_rate(mpll_clk) / 1000 / 1000; /* in MHz */
+ clk_put(mpll_clk);
+ i = 0;
+ do {
+ int index = freq_table[i].index;
+ if (apll_freq_max < clk_info[index].fclk)
+ apll_freq_max = clk_info[index].fclk;
+ i++;
+ } while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
+ apll_freq_max /= 1000; /* in MHz */
+
+ memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
+ sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
+ previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
+
+ return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);
+}
+
+static struct cpufreq_driver s5pv210_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
+ .verify = s5pv210_verify_speed,
+ .target = s5pv210_target,
+ .get = s5pv210_getspeed,
+ .init = s5pv210_cpu_init,
+ .name = "s5pv210",
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ .suspend = s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend,
+ .resume = s5pv210_cpufreq_resume,
+#endif
+};
+
+static int __init s5pv210_cpufreq_init(void)
+{
+ if (s5pv210_workaround())
+ dvs_conf = dvs_conf_workaround;
+
+ arm_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddarm");
+ if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
+ pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddarm\n");
+ goto error;
+ }
+ internal_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddint");
+ if (IS_ERR(internal_regulator)) {
+ pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddint\n");
+ goto error;
+ }
+ goto finish;
+error:
+ pr_warn("Cannot get vddarm or vddint. CPUFREQ Will not"
+ " change the voltage.\n");
+finish:
+ return cpufreq_register_driver(&s5pv210_driver);
+}
+
+late_initcall(s5pv210_cpufreq_init);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e1a1c0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics
+ *
+ * MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
+ *
+ * S5PV210/S5PC110 CPU frequency scaling support
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+*/
+
+#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
+#define __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
+
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+
+#define USE_FREQ_TABLE
+
+enum perf_level {
+ L0 = 0,
+ L1,
+ L2,
+ L3,
+ L4,
+};
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000) /* Use 800MHz when entering sleep */
+
+/* additional symantics for "relation" in cpufreq with pm */
+#define DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x10
+#define ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x20
+#define MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x30
+/* With 0x00(NOCHANGE), it depends on the previous "further" status */
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H */
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-22 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-26 4:54 ` Kukjin Kim
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2010-07-22 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MyungJoo Ham
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, kgene.kim,
myungjoo.ham, ben-linux
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:22:53PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
>
> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
> this version.
>
> Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC,
> and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating clksrc_src
> representations of the clocks. Because CPUFREQ reverts the CLK_SRC
> to the supposed values, this does not affect the consistency as long as
> there are no other modules that modifies clock sources of ARMCLK, G3D,
> G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM (and only CPUFREQ should have the control). As
> soon as clock framework is settled, we may update source clocks
> (.parent field) of those clocks accordingly later.
>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Still
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 10:21 ` Mark Brown
@ 2010-07-26 4:54 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-26 6:15 ` MyungJoo Ham
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2010-07-26 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'MyungJoo Ham', linux-arm-kernel
Cc: kyungmin.park, myungjoo.ham, ben-linux, linux-samsung-soc
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>
> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
>
> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
> this version.
>
> Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC,
> and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating clksrc_src
> representations of the clocks. Because CPUFREQ reverts the CLK_SRC
> to the supposed values, this does not affect the consistency as long as
> there are no other modules that modifies clock sources of ARMCLK, G3D,
> G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM (and only CPUFREQ should have the control). As
> soon as clock framework is settled, we may update source clocks
> (.parent field) of those clocks accordingly later.
>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Hi MyungJoo,
> --
> v2:
> - Ramp-up delay is removed. (let regulator framework do the job)
> - Provide proper max values for regulator_set_voltage
> - Removed unneccesary #ifdef's.
> - Removed unnecessary initialiser for CLK_OUT
> v3:
> - Style corrections (pr_info/pr_err, ...)
> - Revised dvs_conf struct
> v4:
> - Renamed cpufreq-s5pv210.c -> cpufreq.c
> - Style corrections (less #ifdef's, comments)
> - Removed unncessary codes
> - Remove #ifdef for WORKAROUND, use s5pv210_workaround()
> - Renamed some static variables (get rid of s5pv210 prefix)
> - Added machine dependency to Kconfig/Makefile
> - DMC0, DMC1 refresh counter is not updated by a hardcoded value,
but
> with the value given as the default and relative clock speeds.
Besides,
> the algorithm to update DMC0/1 refresh counter is reformed.
>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 5 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c | 783
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h | 40 ++
> 5 files changed, 831 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 98922f7..d5a5916 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ config ARCH_S5PV210
> select HAVE_CLK
> select ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6
> select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> + select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> help
> Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 series based systems
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
> index 631019a..1c6d3bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config CPU_S5PV210
> select PLAT_S5P
> select S3C_PL330_DMA
> select S5P_EXT_INT
> + select S5PV210_CPU_FREQ if CPU_FREQ
> help
> Enable S5PV210 CPU support
>
> @@ -101,4 +102,8 @@ config MACH_SMDKC110
> Machine support for Samsung SMDKC110
> S5PC110(MCP) is one of package option of S5PV210
>
> +config S5PV210_CPU_FREQ
> + bool "S5PV210 CPU-FREQ Support"
> + depends on CPU_S5PV210 && CPU_FREQ
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> index aae592a..72ca5ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> @@ -34,3 +34,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_I2C2) += setup-i2c2.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI) += setup-sdhci.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_CPU_FREQ) += cpufreq.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8ea1ce8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,783 @@
> +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *
> + * CPU frequency scaling for S5PV210/S5PC110
> + * Based on cpu-sa1110.c and s5pc11x-cpufreq.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <asm/system.h>
> +
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/map.h>
> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> +#include <mach/regs-gpio.h>
> +#include <mach/cpu-freq.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/cpu-freq.h>
> +#include <plat/pll.h>
> +#include <plat/clock.h>
> +#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
> +#include <plat/regs-fb.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +#include <plat/pm.h>
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct clk *mpu_clk;
> +static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
> +static struct regulator *internal_regulator;
> +
> +struct s3c_cpufreq_freqs s3c_freqs;
> +
> +static unsigned long previous_arm_volt;
> +
> +static unsigned int backup_dmc0_reg;
> +static unsigned int backup_dmc1_reg;
> +static unsigned int backup_freq_level;
> +static unsigned int mpll_freq; /* in MHz */
> +static unsigned int apll_freq_max; /* in MHz */
> +
> +/* frequency */
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
> + {L0, 1000*1000},
> + {L1, 800*1000},
> + {L2, 400*1000},
> + {L3, 200*1000},
> + {L4, 100*1000},
> + {0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
> +};
> +
> +struct s5pv210_dvs_conf {
> + unsigned long arm_volt; /* uV */
> + unsigned long int_volt; /* uV */
> +};
> +
> +const unsigned long arm_volt_max = 1350000;
> +const unsigned long int_volt_max = 1250000;
> +
> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_workaround[] = {
Is this really workaround?
This is just difference of voltage characteristic of CPU revision, not
workaround.
> + [L0] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1300000,
> + .int_volt = 1200000,
> + },
> + [L1] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
> + .int_volt = 1200000,
> +
> + },
> + [L2] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
> + .int_volt = 1200000,
> +
> + },
> + [L3] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
> + .int_volt = 1200000,
> + },
> + [L4] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
> + .int_volt = 1200000,
> + },
> +};
> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_default[] = {
> + [L0] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
> + .int_volt = 1100000,
> + },
> + [L1] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1200000,
> + .int_volt = 1100000,
> + },
> + [L2] = {
> + .arm_volt = 1050000,
> + .int_volt = 1100000,
> + },
> + [L3] = {
> + .arm_volt = 950000,
> + .int_volt = 1100000,
> + },
> + [L4] = {
> + .arm_volt = 950000,
> + .int_volt = 1000000,
> + },
> +};
> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf *dvs_conf = dvs_conf_default;
> +
> +static u32 clkdiv_val[5][11] = {
> + /*{ APLL, A2M, HCLK_MSYS, PCLK_MSYS,
> + * HCLK_DSYS, PCLK_DSYS, HCLK_PSYS, PCLK_PSYS, ONEDRAM,
> + * MFC, G3D }
> + */
> + /* L0 : [1000/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
> + {0, 4, 4, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
> + /* L1 : [800/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
> + {0, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
> + /* L2 : [400/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
> + {1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
> + /* L3 : [200/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
> + {3, 3, 0, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
> + /* L4 : [100/100/100/100][83/83][66/66][100/100] */
> + {7, 7, 0, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, 7, 0, 0},
> +};
> +
> +static struct s3c_freq clk_info[] = {
> + [L0] = { /* L0: 1GHz */
> + .fclk = 1000000,
> + .armclk = 1000000,
> + .hclk_tns = 0,
> + .hclk = 133000,
> + .pclk = 66000,
> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
> + },
> + [L1] = { /* L1: 800MHz */
> + .fclk = 800000,
> + .armclk = 800000,
> + .hclk_tns = 0,
> + .hclk = 133000,
> + .pclk = 66000,
> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
> + },
> + [L2] = { /* L2: 400MHz */
> + .fclk = 800000,
> + .armclk = 400000,
> + .hclk_tns = 0,
> + .hclk = 133000,
> + .pclk = 66000,
> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
> + },
> + [L3] = { /* L3: 200MHz */
> + .fclk = 800000,
> + .armclk = 200000,
> + .hclk_tns = 0,
> + .hclk = 133000,
> + .pclk = 66000,
> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
> + },
> + [L4] = { /* L4: 100MHz */
> + .fclk = 800000,
> + .armclk = 100000,
> + .hclk_tns = 0,
> + .hclk = 66000,
> + .pclk = 66000,
> + .hclk_msys = 100000,
> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
> + .hclk_dsys = 83375,
> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int s5pv210_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +
No need empty line.
> + if (policy->cpu)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int s5pv210_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + unsigned long rate;
> +
> + if (cpu)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk) / 1000;
> +
> + return rate;
> +}
> +
> +static void s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(unsigned int index,
> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
> +{
> + unsigned int reg;
> +
> + /*
> + * 1. Temporarily change divider for MFC and G3D
> + * SCLKA2M(200/1=200)->(200/4=50)MHz
> + */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
> + reg |= (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
> + (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
How about following for reducing redundant definition?
reg |= (0x3 << 0) | (0x3 << 4); /* G3D_SHIFT, MFC_SHIFT */
Actually, you used same method in below...
+ } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
This is just from CPU revision...not workaround.
> + /*
> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
> + */
> + } else {
> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
> + reg |= (0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT);
> + }
> +
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
> +
> + /* For MFC, G3D dividing */
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
> + } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
> +
> + /*
> + * 2. Change SCLKA2M(200MHz) to SCLKMPLL in MFC_MUX, G3D MUX
> + * (100/4=50)->(667/4=166)MHz
> + */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
> + (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
This is not workaround...just CPU revision...
> + /*
> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
> + */
> + } else {
> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT);
> + }
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
> + } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
> +
> + /* 3. msys: SCLKAPLL -> SCLKMPLL */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
> + } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
> +}
> +
> +static void s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(unsigned int index,
> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
> +{
> + unsigned int reg;
> +
> + /*
> + * 7. Set Lock time = 30us*24MHz = 02cf (EVT1)
> + * WORKAROUND: Lock time = 300us*24Mhz = 7200(0x1c20)
> + * Normal: Lock time = 30us*24Mhz = 0x2cf
> + */
> + if (s5pv210_workaround())
Same....just EVT0...not workaround.
> + __raw_writel(0x1c20, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
> + else
> + __raw_writel(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
> +
> + /*
> + * 8. Turn on APLL
> + * 8-1. Set PMS values
> + * 8-3. Wait until the PLL is locked
> + */
> + if (index == L0)
> + /* APLL FOUT becomes 1000 Mhz */
> + __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
> + else
> + /* APLL FOUT becomes 800 Mhz */
> + __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_APLL_CON);
> + } while (!(reg & (0x1 << 29)));
> +
> + /*
> + * 9. Change source clock from SCLKMPLL(667MHz)
> + * to SCLKA2M(200MHz) in MFC_MUX and G3D_MUX
> + * (667/4=166)->(200/4=50)MHz
> + */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
> + reg |= (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) | (0 <<
> S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
Same.
> + /*
> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
> + */
> + } else {
> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
> + reg |= 0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT;
> + }
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
> + } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
> +
> + /*
> + * 10. Change divider for MFC and G3D
> + * (200/4=50)->(200/1=200)MHz
> + */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
> + reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][10] << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
> + (clkdiv_val[index][9] << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
Same.
> + /*
> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
> + */
> + } else {
> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
> + reg |= 0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT;
> + }
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
> + } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
> +
> + /* 11. Change MPLL to APLL in MSYS_MUX */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
> + reg |= (0x0 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT); /* SCLKMPLL ->
> SCLKAPLL */
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
> + } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int no_cpufreq_access;
> +/*
> + * s5pv210_target: relation has an additional symantics other than
> + * the standard
> + * [0x30]:
> + * 1: disable further access to target until being re-enabled.
> + * 2: re-enable access to target */
> +#endif
> +static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
s5pv210_target what?...
> + unsigned int target_freq,
> + unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + static int initialized;
> + int ret = 0;
> + unsigned long arm_clk;
> + unsigned int index, reg, arm_volt, int_volt;
> + unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
> +
> + cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
> + "cpufreq: Entering for %dkHz\n", target_freq);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + if ((relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ) &&
> + (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)) {
> + /* Invalidate both if both marked */
> + relation &= ~ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
> + relation &= ~DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
> + pr_err("%s:%d denied marking \"FURTHER_CPUFREQ\""
> + " as both marked.\n",
> + __FILE__, __LINE__);
> + }
> + if (relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
> + no_cpufreq_access = 0;
> + if (no_cpufreq_access == 1) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
> + pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
> + " temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__,
__func__);
> +#endif
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
> + no_cpufreq_access = 1;
> + relation &= ~MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
> +#endif
> +
> + s3c_freqs.freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
> +
> + if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
> + target_freq, relation, &index)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + arm_clk = freq_table[index].frequency;
> +
> + s3c_freqs.freqs.new = arm_clk;
> + s3c_freqs.freqs.cpu = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Run this function unconditionally until s3c_freqs.freqs.new
> + * and s3c_freqs.freqs.old are both set by this function.
> + */
> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new == s3c_freqs.freqs.old &&
> + initialized >= 2)
> + return 0;
> + else if (initialized < 2)
> + initialized++;
> +
Where is initialization of 'initialized'?...
> + arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
> + int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
> +
> + /* iNew clock information update */
'iNew clock'?
Hmm...I found this typo in the S.LSI's original code :-(
> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.new, &clk_info[index],
> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
> +
> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new >= s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
> + /* Voltage up code: increase ARM first */
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
> + !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
> + regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
> + arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
> + regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
> + int_volt, int_volt_max);
> + }
> + }
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> +
> + if (s3c_freqs.new.fclk != s3c_freqs.old.fclk || initialized < 2)
> + pll_changing = 1;
> +
> + if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys != s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys ||
> + initialized < 2)
Hmm...why need 'initialized' checking?
> + bus_speed_changing = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * If ONEDRAM(DMC0)'s clock is getting slower, DMC0's
> + * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
> + * DMC0 clock. We assume that DMC0's source clock never
> + * changes. This is a temporary setting for the transition.
> + * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
> + */
Actually there are some S5PC110 MCP types which don't have ONEDRAM.
...so how can distinguish it? No need check it?
> + reg = (__raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6) & S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK)
> + >> S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT;
> + if (clkdiv_val[index][8] > reg) {
> + reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (reg + 1) / (clkdiv_val[index][8] +
1);
> + WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
> + reg &= 0xFFFF;
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If hclk_msys (for DMC1) is getting slower, DMC1's
> + * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
> + * hclk_msys in order to get rid of glitches in the
> + * transition. This is temporary setting for the transition.
> + * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
> + *
> + * Besides, we need to consider the case when PLL speed changes,
> + * where the DMC1's source clock hclk_msys is changed from ARMCLK
> + * to MPLL temporarily. DMC1 needs to be ready for this
> + * transition as well.
> + */
> + if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys < s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys) {
> + /*
> + * hclk_msys is up to 12bit. (200000)
> + * reg is 16bit. so no overflow, yet.
> + *
> + * May need to use div64.h later with larger hclk_msys or
> + * DMCx refresh counter. But, we have bugs in do_div and
> + * that should be fixed before.
> + */
> + reg = backup_dmc1_reg * s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys;
> + reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
> +
> + /*
> + * When ARM_CLK is absed on APLL->MPLL,
> + * hclk_msys becomes hclk_msys *= MPLL/APLL;
> + *
> + * Based on the worst case scenario, we use MPLL/APLL_MAX
> + * assuming that MPLL clock speed does not change.
> + *
> + * Multiplied first in order to reduce rounding error.
> + * because reg has 15b length, using 64b should be enough to
> + * prevent overflow.
> + */
> + if (pll_changing) {
> + reg *= mpll_freq;
> + reg /= apll_freq_max;
> + }
> + WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * APLL should be changed in this level
> + * APLL -> MPLL(for stable transition) -> APLL
> + * Some clock source's clock API are not prepared. Do not use clock
> API
> + * in below code.
> + */
> + if (pll_changing)
> + s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
> +
> + /* ARM MCS value changed */
> + if (index != L4) {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
> + reg &= ~0x3;
> + reg |= 0x1;
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
> + }
> +
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
> +
> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_MASK
> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_MASK |
> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_MASK
> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_MASK |
> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_MASK
> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_MASK |
> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_MASK);
> +
> + reg |= ((clkdiv_val[index][0]<<S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][1] << S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][2] <<
> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][3] <<
> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][4] <<
> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][5] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][6] <<
> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_SHIFT)
> + | (clkdiv_val[index][7] <<
> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT));
> +
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
> +
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
> + } while (reg & 0xff);
> +
> + /* ARM MCS value changed */
> + if (index == L4) {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
> + reg &= ~0x3;
> + reg |= 0x3;
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
> + }
> +
> + if (pll_changing)
> + s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
> +
> + /*
> + * Adjust DMC0 refresh ratio according to the rate of DMC0
> + * The DIV value of DMC0 clock changes and SRC value is not
controlled.
> + * We assume that no one changes SRC value of DMC0 clock, either.
> + */
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK;
> + reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][8] << S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT);
> + /* ONEDRAM(DMC0) Clock Divider Ratio: 7+1 for L4, 3+1 for Others */
> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
> + do {
> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT1);
> + } while (reg & (1 << 15));
> +
> + /*
> + * If DMC0 clock gets slower (by orginal clock speed / n),
> + * then, the refresh rate should decrease
> + * (by original refresh count / n) (n: divider)
> + */
> + reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (clkdiv_val[backup_freq_level][8] + 1)
> + / (clkdiv_val[index][8] + 1);
> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
> +
> + /*
> + * Adjust DMC1 refresh ratio according to the rate of hclk_msys
> + * (L0~L3: 200 <-> L4: 100)
> + * If DMC1 clock gets slower (by original clock speed * n),
> + * then, the refresh rate should decrease
> + * (by original refresh count * n) (n : clock rate)
> + */
> + reg = backup_dmc1_reg * clk_info[index].hclk_msys;
> + reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
> +
> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new < s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
> + /* Voltage down: decrease INT first.*/
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
> + !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
> + regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
> + int_volt, int_volt_max);
> + regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
> + arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
> + }
> + }
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> +
> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &s3c_freqs.new, sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
> + cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
> + "cpufreq: Performance changed[L%d]\n", index);
> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int previous_frequency;
> +
> +static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + pm_message_t pmsg)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + pr_info("cpufreq: Entering suspend.\n");
> +
> + previous_frequency = cpufreq_get(0);
> + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
> + DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int s5pv210_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u32 rate;
> + int level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
> + int i;
Should be 'int i = 0;' for removing below 'i = 0;'
> +
> + pr_info("cpufreq: Waking up from a suspend.\n");
> +
> + __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), previous_frequency,
> + ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
> +
> + /* Clock information update with wakeup value */
> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
> +
> + i = 0;
...
> + while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
> + if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
> + level = freq_table[i].index;
> + break;
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
> + pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
> + "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
> + __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
> + level = L1;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static int __init s5pv210_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
s5pv210_cpu_init?...is this function cpu initialization?..No!
hmm...s5pv210_cpufreq_init() is better...but used at below...
...need another name for easily reading
> +{
> + u32 rate ;
> + int i, level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
> + struct clk *mpll_clk;
> +
> + pr_info("S5PV210 CPUFREQ Initialising...\n");
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + no_cpufreq_access = 0;
> +#endif
> + mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk)) {
> + pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get armclk\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
> + }
> +
> + if (policy->cpu != 0) {
> + pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get proper cpu(%d)\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
> +
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
> +
> + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 40000; /* 1us */
> +
> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
> + i = 0;
> +
i = 0?
> + while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
> + if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
> + level = freq_table[i].index;
> + break;
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
> + pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
> + "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
> + __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
> + level = L1;
> + }
> +
> + backup_dmc0_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
> + backup_dmc1_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
> + backup_freq_level = level;
> + mpll_clk = clk_get(NULL, "mout_mpll");
> + mpll_freq = clk_get_rate(mpll_clk) / 1000 / 1000; /* in MHz */
> + clk_put(mpll_clk);
> + i = 0;
> + do {
> + int index = freq_table[i].index;
> + if (apll_freq_max < clk_info[index].fclk)
> + apll_freq_max = clk_info[index].fclk;
> + i++;
> + } while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
> + apll_freq_max /= 1000; /* in MHz */
> +
> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
> +
> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver s5pv210_driver = {
s5pv210_cpufreq_driver...
> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
> + .verify = s5pv210_verify_speed,
> + .target = s5pv210_target,
> + .get = s5pv210_getspeed,
> + .init = s5pv210_cpu_init,
> + .name = "s5pv210",
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .suspend = s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend,
> + .resume = s5pv210_cpufreq_resume,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +static int __init s5pv210_cpufreq_init(void)
> +{
> + if (s5pv210_workaround())
Same...just CPU revision...not workaround...
> + dvs_conf = dvs_conf_workaround;
> +
> + arm_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddarm");
> + if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
> + pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddarm\n");
> + goto error;
> + }
> + internal_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddint");
> + if (IS_ERR(internal_regulator)) {
> + pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddint\n");
> + goto error;
> + }
> + goto finish;
> +error:
> + pr_warn("Cannot get vddarm or vddint. CPUFREQ Will not"
> + " change the voltage.\n");
> +finish:
> + return cpufreq_register_driver(&s5pv210_driver);
s5pv210_cpufreq_driver...
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(s5pv210_cpufreq_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e1a1c0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +/* arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics
> + *
> + * MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> + *
> + * S5PV210/S5PC110 CPU frequency scaling support
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +*/
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
> +#define __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
> +
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +
> +#define USE_FREQ_TABLE
Where is this used?
> +
> +enum perf_level {
> + L0 = 0,
> + L1,
> + L2,
> + L3,
> + L4,
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +#define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000) /* Use 800MHz when entering sleep */
> +
> +/* additional symantics for "relation" in cpufreq with pm */
> +#define DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x10
> +#define ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x20
> +#define MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x30
> +/* With 0x00(NOCHANGE), it depends on the previous "further" status */
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H */
> --
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required.
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210 cpu-freq MyungJoo Ham
@ 2010-07-26 4:58 ` Kukjin Kim
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2010-07-26 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'MyungJoo Ham', linux-arm-kernel
Cc: kyungmin.park, myungjoo.ham, ben-linux, linux-samsung-soc
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>
> Early products of S5PV210 had several errata that require kernel to
> avoid using some parts/instructions of the CPU or to add protection
> instructions. There are products with such early production CPUs;
> thus, we want to distinguish them in kernel. This patch is to
> distinguish such products.
>
> Include <mach/hardware.h> and call s5pv210_workaround()
>
> For example,
>
> if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
> ... execute workaround code ...
> } else {
> ... execute normal code ...
> }
>
> Where we can identify whether such workaround codes are required or not,
> call set_s5pv210_workaround_required() is it's needed. Note that in this
> system, it can be identified at board support file
> (arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-*.c), not at the cpe file
> (arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c). It is because we cannot determine based
> on the CPU_ID or PRODUCT_ID only; board revision number is required to
> determine.
>
> For Aquila machine. (mach-aquila.c)
>
> Part of Aquila machines have the early production CPUs that require
> to address errata issues. Note that we don't do this for GONI machines
> because they have never used early production CPUs with errata. Besides,
> please note that there are other boards that use such early produces
> other than Aquila. However, those boards/machines are not registered at
> the /linux/arch/arm/tools/mach-types, yet; thus, we have omitted them
> in this patch.
Hi,
Actually, I can't find any reason to need this 'workaround' function.
I think...this is for just EVT0, not workaround.
Please check my comments about your 7/7 patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c | 33
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
> index 94c632b..b9fe38e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <asm/mach/map.h>
> #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
>
> +#include <asm/mach-types.h>
> #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> #include <mach/map.h>
> #include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> @@ -128,6 +129,38 @@ static struct sys_device s5pv210_sysdev = {
> .cls = &s5pv210_sysclass,
> };
>
> +/* See if workaround to avoid errata of earlier revisions */
> +static bool s5pv210_workaround_required;
> +
> +bool s5pv210_workaround(void)
> +{
> + return s5pv210_workaround_required;
> +}
> +
> +void set_s5pv210_workaround(unsigned int board_rev)
> +{
> + s5pv210_workaround_required = false;
> +
> + if (machine_is_aquila()) {
> + if (board_rev & 0x0800) {
> + if ((board_rev & 0xF) < 8)
> + s5pv210_workaround_required = true;
> + } else if (board_rev & 0x2000) {
> + s5pv210_workaround_required = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * When machine_is_goni(), always false
> + *
> + * When machine_arch_number is 3260 and board_rev&0xF is 5,
> + * always true. But, omitted as it's not registered at
> + * mach_types, yet.
> + * When machine_arch_number is 3104 and board_rev&0xF is 0,
> + * always true, as well. Omitted by the same reason.
> + */
> +}
> +
> static int __init s5pv210_core_init(void)
> {
> return sysdev_class_register(&s5pv210_sysclass);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
> index fada7a3..0c41852 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/hardware.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H
> #define __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H __FILE__
>
> -/* currently nothing here, placeholder */
> +extern bool s5pv210_workaround(void);
> +extern void set_s5pv210_workaround(unsigned int);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_HARDWARE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-
> aquila.c
> index 46d5c7e..85024af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> #include <mach/regs-fb.h>
> #include <mach/gpio.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>
> #include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
> #include <plat/regs-serial.h>
> @@ -536,6 +537,9 @@ static void __init aquila_map_io(void)
>
> static void __init aquila_machine_init(void)
> {
> + /* Determine whether we need workaround codes */
> + set_s5pv210_workaround(system_rev);
> +
> /* PMIC */
> aquila_pmic_init();
> i2c_register_board_info(AP_I2C_GPIO_PMIC_BUS_4,
> i2c_gpio_pmic_devs,
> --
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support
2010-07-26 4:54 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2010-07-26 6:15 ` MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2010-07-26 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, kyungmin.park, ben-linux
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
>>
>> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
>> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
>> this version.
>>
>> Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC,
>> and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating clksrc_src
>> representations of the clocks. Because CPUFREQ reverts the CLK_SRC
>> to the supposed values, this does not affect the consistency as long as
>> there are no other modules that modifies clock sources of ARMCLK, G3D,
>> G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM (and only CPUFREQ should have the control). As
>> soon as clock framework is settled, we may update source clocks
>> (.parent field) of those clocks accordingly later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>
> Hi MyungJoo,
Hello,
>
>> --
>> v2:
>> - Ramp-up delay is removed. (let regulator framework do the job)
>> - Provide proper max values for regulator_set_voltage
>> - Removed unneccesary #ifdef's.
>> - Removed unnecessary initialiser for CLK_OUT
>> v3:
>> - Style corrections (pr_info/pr_err, ...)
>> - Revised dvs_conf struct
>> v4:
>> - Renamed cpufreq-s5pv210.c -> cpufreq.c
>> - Style corrections (less #ifdef's, comments)
>> - Removed unncessary codes
>> - Remove #ifdef for WORKAROUND, use s5pv210_workaround()
>> - Renamed some static variables (get rid of s5pv210 prefix)
>> - Added machine dependency to Kconfig/Makefile
>> - DMC0, DMC1 refresh counter is not updated by a hardcoded value,
> but
>> with the value given as the default and relative clock speeds.
> Besides,
>> the algorithm to update DMC0/1 refresh counter is reformed.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 5 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 2 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c | 783
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h | 40 ++
>> 5 files changed, 831 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 98922f7..d5a5916 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ config ARCH_S5PV210
>> select HAVE_CLK
>> select ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6
>> select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
>> + select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
>> help
>> Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 series based systems
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
>> index 631019a..1c6d3bc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config CPU_S5PV210
>> select PLAT_S5P
>> select S3C_PL330_DMA
>> select S5P_EXT_INT
>> + select S5PV210_CPU_FREQ if CPU_FREQ
>> help
>> Enable S5PV210 CPU support
>>
>> @@ -101,4 +102,8 @@ config MACH_SMDKC110
>> Machine support for Samsung SMDKC110
>> S5PC110(MCP) is one of package option of S5PV210
>>
>> +config S5PV210_CPU_FREQ
>> + bool "S5PV210 CPU-FREQ Support"
>> + depends on CPU_S5PV210 && CPU_FREQ
>> +
>> endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
>> index aae592a..72ca5ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
>> @@ -34,3 +34,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_I2C2) += setup-i2c2.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI) += setup-sdhci.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o
>> +
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_CPU_FREQ) += cpufreq.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8ea1ce8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,783 @@
>> +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + *
>> + * CPU frequency scaling for S5PV210/S5PC110
>> + * Based on cpu-sa1110.c and s5pc11x-cpufreq.c
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <asm/system.h>
>> +
>> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include <mach/map.h>
>> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
>> +#include <mach/regs-gpio.h>
>> +#include <mach/cpu-freq.h>
>> +
>> +#include <plat/cpu-freq.h>
>> +#include <plat/pll.h>
>> +#include <plat/clock.h>
>> +#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
>> +#include <plat/regs-fb.h>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +#include <plat/pm.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static struct clk *mpu_clk;
>> +static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
>> +static struct regulator *internal_regulator;
>> +
>> +struct s3c_cpufreq_freqs s3c_freqs;
>> +
>> +static unsigned long previous_arm_volt;
>> +
>> +static unsigned int backup_dmc0_reg;
>> +static unsigned int backup_dmc1_reg;
>> +static unsigned int backup_freq_level;
>> +static unsigned int mpll_freq; /* in MHz */
>> +static unsigned int apll_freq_max; /* in MHz */
>> +
>> +/* frequency */
>> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>> + {L0, 1000*1000},
>> + {L1, 800*1000},
>> + {L2, 400*1000},
>> + {L3, 200*1000},
>> + {L4, 100*1000},
>> + {0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct s5pv210_dvs_conf {
>> + unsigned long arm_volt; /* uV */
>> + unsigned long int_volt; /* uV */
>> +};
>> +
>> +const unsigned long arm_volt_max = 1350000;
>> +const unsigned long int_volt_max = 1250000;
>> +
>> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_workaround[] = {
>
> Is this really workaround?
>
> This is just difference of voltage characteristic of CPU revision, not
> workaround.
When the user manual (even when EVT1 was not released) says it's 1.2V
for 1GHz and later we use 1.3V for 1GHz for the stability, it only
looks as if we are doing workaround for the stability of EVT0. That's
why I'm putting that name on it. However, changing the name of this
variable is nothing, so, it can be done with the next revision.
>
>> + [L0] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1300000,
>> + .int_volt = 1200000,
>> + },
>> + [L1] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
>> + .int_volt = 1200000,
>> +
>> + },
>> + [L2] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
>> + .int_volt = 1200000,
>> +
>> + },
>> + [L3] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
>> + .int_volt = 1200000,
>> + },
>> + [L4] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
>> + .int_volt = 1200000,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf_default[] = {
>> + [L0] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1250000,
>> + .int_volt = 1100000,
>> + },
>> + [L1] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1200000,
>> + .int_volt = 1100000,
>> + },
>> + [L2] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 1050000,
>> + .int_volt = 1100000,
>> + },
>> + [L3] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 950000,
>> + .int_volt = 1100000,
>> + },
>> + [L4] = {
>> + .arm_volt = 950000,
>> + .int_volt = 1000000,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf *dvs_conf = dvs_conf_default;
>> +
>> +static u32 clkdiv_val[5][11] = {
>> + /*{ APLL, A2M, HCLK_MSYS, PCLK_MSYS,
>> + * HCLK_DSYS, PCLK_DSYS, HCLK_PSYS, PCLK_PSYS, ONEDRAM,
>> + * MFC, G3D }
>> + */
>> + /* L0 : [1000/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
>> + {0, 4, 4, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
>> + /* L1 : [800/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
>> + {0, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
>> + /* L2 : [400/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
>> + {1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
>> + /* L3 : [200/200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
>> + {3, 3, 0, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
>> + /* L4 : [100/100/100/100][83/83][66/66][100/100] */
>> + {7, 7, 0, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, 7, 0, 0},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct s3c_freq clk_info[] = {
>> + [L0] = { /* L0: 1GHz */
>> + .fclk = 1000000,
>> + .armclk = 1000000,
>> + .hclk_tns = 0,
>> + .hclk = 133000,
>> + .pclk = 66000,
>> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
>> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
>> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + },
>> + [L1] = { /* L1: 800MHz */
>> + .fclk = 800000,
>> + .armclk = 800000,
>> + .hclk_tns = 0,
>> + .hclk = 133000,
>> + .pclk = 66000,
>> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
>> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
>> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + },
>> + [L2] = { /* L2: 400MHz */
>> + .fclk = 800000,
>> + .armclk = 400000,
>> + .hclk_tns = 0,
>> + .hclk = 133000,
>> + .pclk = 66000,
>> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
>> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
>> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + },
>> + [L3] = { /* L3: 200MHz */
>> + .fclk = 800000,
>> + .armclk = 200000,
>> + .hclk_tns = 0,
>> + .hclk = 133000,
>> + .pclk = 66000,
>> + .hclk_msys = 200000,
>> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .hclk_dsys = 166750,
>> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + },
>> + [L4] = { /* L4: 100MHz */
>> + .fclk = 800000,
>> + .armclk = 100000,
>> + .hclk_tns = 0,
>> + .hclk = 66000,
>> + .pclk = 66000,
>> + .hclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .pclk_msys = 100000,
>> + .hclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + .pclk_dsys = 83375,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int s5pv210_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> +
>
> No need empty line.
Yes.
>
>> + if (policy->cpu)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int s5pv210_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long rate;
>> +
>> + if (cpu)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk) / 1000;
>> +
>> + return rate;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(unsigned int index,
>> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int reg;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 1. Temporarily change divider for MFC and G3D
>> + * SCLKA2M(200/1=200)->(200/4=50)MHz
>> + */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
>> + reg |= (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
>> + (0x3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
>
> How about following for reducing redundant definition?
> reg |= (0x3 << 0) | (0x3 << 4); /* G3D_SHIFT, MFC_SHIFT */
>
> Actually, you used same method in below...
> + } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
>
We are accessing the same shift values with the same registers again
at another file (arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c). Isn't it normal to
use some name for such values? As long as we use the same names as in
clock.c (although clock.s is not patched to use names yet), they are
not defined "redundantly", aren't they?
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
>
> This is just from CPU revision...not workaround.
Yes, having no G2D is not "errata", but "feature not added". Do you
think a name such as "s5pv210_evt0_only" would fit? I think this name
would fit for both errata workaround code and feature-not-added.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
>> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
>> + */
>> + } else {
>> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
>> + reg |= (0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT);
>> + }
>> +
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
>> +
>> + /* For MFC, G3D dividing */
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
>> + } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 2. Change SCLKA2M(200MHz) to SCLKMPLL in MFC_MUX, G3D MUX
>> + * (100/4=50)->(667/4=166)MHz
>> + */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
>> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
>> + (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
>
>
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
>
> This is not workaround...just CPU revision...
>
>> + /*
>> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
>> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
>> + */
>> + } else {
>> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
>> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT);
>> + }
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
>> + } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
>> +
>> + /* 3. msys: SCLKAPLL -> SCLKMPLL */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
>> + reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
>> + } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(unsigned int index,
>> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int reg;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 7. Set Lock time = 30us*24MHz = 02cf (EVT1)
>> + * WORKAROUND: Lock time = 300us*24Mhz = 7200(0x1c20)
>> + * Normal: Lock time = 30us*24Mhz = 0x2cf
>> + */
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround())
>
> Same....just EVT0...not workaround.
>
>> + __raw_writel(0x1c20, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
>> + else
>> + __raw_writel(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 8. Turn on APLL
>> + * 8-1. Set PMS values
>> + * 8-3. Wait until the PLL is locked
>> + */
>> + if (index == L0)
>> + /* APLL FOUT becomes 1000 Mhz */
>> + __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
>> + else
>> + /* APLL FOUT becomes 800 Mhz */
>> + __raw_writel(PLL45XX_APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_APLL_CON);
>> + } while (!(reg & (0x1 << 29)));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 9. Change source clock from SCLKMPLL(667MHz)
>> + * to SCLKA2M(200MHz) in MFC_MUX and G3D_MUX
>> + * (667/4=166)->(200/4=50)MHz
>> + */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
>> + reg |= (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) | (0 <<
>> S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
>
>
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
>
> Same.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
>> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
>> + */
>> + } else {
>> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_MASK;
>> + reg |= 0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G2D_SHIFT;
>> + }
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT1);
>> + } while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * 10. Change divider for MFC and G3D
>> + * (200/4=50)->(200/1=200)MHz
>> + */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
>> + reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][10] << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
>> + (clkdiv_val[index][9] << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
>
>
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround()) {
>
> Same.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Early version does NOT have G2D
>> + * Do Nothing about G2D.
>> + */
>> + } else {
>> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_MASK;
>> + reg |= 0x2 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G2D_SHIFT;
>> + }
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
>> + } while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
>> +
>> + /* 11. Change MPLL to APLL in MSYS_MUX */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
>> + reg |= (0x0 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT); /* SCLKMPLL ->
>> SCLKAPLL */
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_MUX_STAT0);
>> + } while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int no_cpufreq_access;
>> +/*
>> + * s5pv210_target: relation has an additional symantics other than
>> + * the standard
>> + * [0x30]:
>> + * 1: disable further access to target until being re-enabled.
>> + * 2: re-enable access to target */
>> +#endif
>> +static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> s5pv210_target what?...
I will rename names including this and the following ones.
>
>> + unsigned int target_freq,
>> + unsigned int relation)
>> +{
>> + static int initialized;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + unsigned long arm_clk;
>> + unsigned int index, reg, arm_volt, int_volt;
>> + unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
>> + unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
>> +
>> + cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
>> + "cpufreq: Entering for %dkHz\n", target_freq);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + if ((relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ) &&
>> + (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)) {
>> + /* Invalidate both if both marked */
>> + relation &= ~ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
>> + relation &= ~DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
>> + pr_err("%s:%d denied marking \"FURTHER_CPUFREQ\""
>> + " as both marked.\n",
>> + __FILE__, __LINE__);
>> + }
>> + if (relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
>> + no_cpufreq_access = 0;
>> + if (no_cpufreq_access == 1) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
>> + pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
>> + " temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__,
> __func__);
>> +#endif
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + if (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
>> + no_cpufreq_access = 1;
>> + relation &= ~MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + s3c_freqs.freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
>> +
>> + if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
>> + target_freq, relation, &index)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + arm_clk = freq_table[index].frequency;
>> +
>> + s3c_freqs.freqs.new = arm_clk;
>> + s3c_freqs.freqs.cpu = 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Run this function unconditionally until s3c_freqs.freqs.new
>> + * and s3c_freqs.freqs.old are both set by this function.
>> + */
>> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new == s3c_freqs.freqs.old &&
>> + initialized >= 2)
>> + return 0;
>> + else if (initialized < 2)
>> + initialized++;
>> +
>
> Where is initialization of 'initialized'?...
It's static. If we initialize it with 0, we get:
ERROR: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL
#381: FILE: arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c:381:
+ static int initialized = 0;
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 783 lines checked
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c has style problems, please review. If
any of these errors
>
>> + arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
>> + int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
>> +
>> + /* iNew clock information update */
>
> 'iNew clock'?
> Hmm...I found this typo in the S.LSI's original code :-(
uh oh.. we've got so many copy-pasted codes.. :(
>
>> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.new, &clk_info[index],
>> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
>> +
>> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new >= s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
>> + /* Voltage up code: increase ARM first */
>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
>> + !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
>> + regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
>> + arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
>> + regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
>> + int_volt, int_volt_max);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>> +
>> + if (s3c_freqs.new.fclk != s3c_freqs.old.fclk || initialized < 2)
>> + pll_changing = 1;
>> +
>> + if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys != s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys ||
>> + initialized < 2)
>
> Hmm...why need 'initialized' checking?
I did it (counting the initializing executions of "target" function)
in order to guarantee s3c_freqs.new and s3c_freqs.old values correctly
reflect the status of CPU clocks as soon as possible because we do
_not_ have the guarantee that the bootloader has given the right
values for the clock settings (as in clkdiv_val[]). With this
checking, we forcibly set the clock settings as in clkdiv_val even if
the frequency is not being effectively changed; it is called when
CPUFREQ is loaded. If we do not check this, clock settings related
with clkdiv_val[] won't be initialized by CPUFREQ until the frequency
is changed from the previous one and both s3c_freqs.new and
s3c_freqs.old should reflect the actual settings. However, a slight
modification will let it do this in one cycle and I can do it with the
next revision (making initialized < 2 --> initialized < 1).
>
>> + bus_speed_changing = 1;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If ONEDRAM(DMC0)'s clock is getting slower, DMC0's
>> + * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
>> + * DMC0 clock. We assume that DMC0's source clock never
>> + * changes. This is a temporary setting for the transition.
>> + * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
>> + */
>
> Actually there are some S5PC110 MCP types which don't have ONEDRAM.
> ...so how can distinguish it? No need check it?
Is accessing DMC0's TIMINGAREF registers (0xF0000030) without the
existence of ONEDRAM problematic? In this patch, writing values of
DMC0 is based on the given (by bootloader) value of DMC0. It only sets
the refresh count of DMC0/DMC1. I'm not sure how the hardware would
work; however, I guess it would not be a problem if there exists no
corresponding ONEDRAM.
>
>> + reg = (__raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6) & S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK)
>> + >> S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT;
>> + if (clkdiv_val[index][8] > reg) {
>> + reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (reg + 1) / (clkdiv_val[index][8] +
> 1);
>> + WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
>> + reg &= 0xFFFF;
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If hclk_msys (for DMC1) is getting slower, DMC1's
>> + * refresh counter should decrease before slowing down
>> + * hclk_msys in order to get rid of glitches in the
>> + * transition. This is temporary setting for the transition.
>> + * Stable setting is done at the end of this function.
>> + *
>> + * Besides, we need to consider the case when PLL speed changes,
>> + * where the DMC1's source clock hclk_msys is changed from ARMCLK
>> + * to MPLL temporarily. DMC1 needs to be ready for this
>> + * transition as well.
>> + */
>> + if (s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys < s3c_freqs.old.hclk_msys) {
>> + /*
>> + * hclk_msys is up to 12bit. (200000)
>> + * reg is 16bit. so no overflow, yet.
>> + *
>> + * May need to use div64.h later with larger hclk_msys or
>> + * DMCx refresh counter. But, we have bugs in do_div and
>> + * that should be fixed before.
>> + */
>> + reg = backup_dmc1_reg * s3c_freqs.new.hclk_msys;
>> + reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * When ARM_CLK is absed on APLL->MPLL,
>> + * hclk_msys becomes hclk_msys *= MPLL/APLL;
>> + *
>> + * Based on the worst case scenario, we use MPLL/APLL_MAX
>> + * assuming that MPLL clock speed does not change.
>> + *
>> + * Multiplied first in order to reduce rounding error.
>> + * because reg has 15b length, using 64b should be enough to
>> + * prevent overflow.
>> + */
>> + if (pll_changing) {
>> + reg *= mpll_freq;
>> + reg /= apll_freq_max;
>> + }
>> + WARN_ON(reg > 0xFFFF);
>> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * APLL should be changed in this level
>> + * APLL -> MPLL(for stable transition) -> APLL
>> + * Some clock source's clock API are not prepared. Do not use clock
>> API
>> + * in below code.
>> + */
>> + if (pll_changing)
>> + s5pv210_target_APLL2MPLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
>> +
>> + /* ARM MCS value changed */
>> + if (index != L4) {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
>> + reg &= ~0x3;
>> + reg |= 0x1;
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
>> + }
>> +
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
>> +
>> + reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_MASK
>> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_MASK |
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_MASK
>> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_MASK |
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_MASK
>> + | S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_MASK |
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_MASK);
>> +
>> + reg |= ((clkdiv_val[index][0]<<S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][1] << S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][2] <<
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][3] <<
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][4] <<
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][5] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][6] <<
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_SHIFT)
>> + | (clkdiv_val[index][7] <<
>> S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT));
>> +
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT0);
>> + } while (reg & 0xff);
>> +
>> + /* ARM MCS value changed */
>> + if (index == L4) {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
>> + reg &= ~0x3;
>> + reg |= 0x3;
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pll_changing)
>> + s5pv210_target_MPLL2APLL(index, bus_speed_changing);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Adjust DMC0 refresh ratio according to the rate of DMC0
>> + * The DIV value of DMC0 clock changes and SRC value is not
> controlled.
>> + * We assume that no one changes SRC value of DMC0 clock, either.
>> + */
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
>> + reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK;
>> + reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][8] << S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT);
>> + /* ONEDRAM(DMC0) Clock Divider Ratio: 7+1 for L4, 3+1 for Others */
>> + __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
>> + do {
>> + reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV_STAT1);
>> + } while (reg & (1 << 15));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If DMC0 clock gets slower (by orginal clock speed / n),
>> + * then, the refresh rate should decrease
>> + * (by original refresh count / n) (n: divider)
>> + */
>> + reg = backup_dmc0_reg * (clkdiv_val[backup_freq_level][8] + 1)
>> + / (clkdiv_val[index][8] + 1);
>> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Adjust DMC1 refresh ratio according to the rate of hclk_msys
>> + * (L0~L3: 200 <-> L4: 100)
>> + * If DMC1 clock gets slower (by original clock speed * n),
>> + * then, the refresh rate should decrease
>> + * (by original refresh count * n) (n : clock rate)
>> + */
>> + reg = backup_dmc1_reg * clk_info[index].hclk_msys;
>> + reg /= clk_info[backup_freq_level].hclk_msys;
>> + __raw_writel(reg & 0xFFFF, S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
>> +
>> + if (s3c_freqs.freqs.new < s3c_freqs.freqs.old) {
>> + /* Voltage down: decrease INT first.*/
>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_regulator) &&
>> + !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(internal_regulator)) {
>> + regulator_set_voltage(internal_regulator,
>> + int_volt, int_volt_max);
>> + regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
>> + arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&s3c_freqs.freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>> +
>> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &s3c_freqs.new, sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
>> + cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, KERN_INFO,
>> + "cpufreq: Performance changed[L%d]\n", index);
>> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int previous_frequency;
>> +
>> +static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> + pm_message_t pmsg)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + pr_info("cpufreq: Entering suspend.\n");
>> +
>> + previous_frequency = cpufreq_get(0);
>> + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
>> + DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int s5pv210_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + u32 rate;
>> + int level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
>> + int i;
>
> Should be 'int i = 0;' for removing below 'i = 0;'
Ok. will do.
>
>> +
>> + pr_info("cpufreq: Waking up from a suspend.\n");
>> +
>> + __cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), previous_frequency,
>> + ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
>> +
>> + /* Clock information update with wakeup value */
>> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>
> ...
>
>> + while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
>> + if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
>> + level = freq_table[i].index;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
>> + pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
>> + "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
>> + __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
>> + level = L1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
>> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
>> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static int __init s5pv210_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> s5pv210_cpu_init?...is this function cpu initialization?..No!
> hmm...s5pv210_cpufreq_init() is better...but used at below...
>
> ...need another name for easily reading
sure.
>
>> +{
>> + u32 rate ;
>> + int i, level = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
>> + struct clk *mpll_clk;
>> +
>> + pr_info("S5PV210 CPUFREQ Initialising...\n");
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + no_cpufreq_access = 0;
>> +#endif
>> + mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk)) {
>> + pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get armclk\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (policy->cpu != 0) {
>> + pr_err("S5PV210 CPUFREQ cannot get proper cpu(%d)\n",
>> + policy->cpu);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
>> +
>> + cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
>> +
>> + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 40000; /* 1us */
>> +
>> + rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk);
>> + i = 0;
>> +
> i = 0?
>
>> + while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
>> + if (freq_table[i].frequency * 1000 == rate) {
>> + level = freq_table[i].index;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (level == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { /* Not found */
>> + pr_err("[%s:%d] clock speed does not match: "
>> + "%d. Using L1 of 800MHz.\n",
>> + __FILE__, __LINE__, rate);
>> + level = L1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + backup_dmc0_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
>> + backup_dmc1_reg = __raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30) & 0xFFFF;
>> + backup_freq_level = level;
>> + mpll_clk = clk_get(NULL, "mout_mpll");
>> + mpll_freq = clk_get_rate(mpll_clk) / 1000 / 1000; /* in MHz */
>> + clk_put(mpll_clk);
>> + i = 0;
>> + do {
>> + int index = freq_table[i].index;
>> + if (apll_freq_max < clk_info[index].fclk)
>> + apll_freq_max = clk_info[index].fclk;
>> + i++;
>> + } while (freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
>> + apll_freq_max /= 1000; /* in MHz */
>> +
>> + memcpy(&s3c_freqs.old, &clk_info[level],
>> + sizeof(struct s3c_freq));
>> + previous_arm_volt = dvs_conf[level].arm_volt;
>> +
>> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct cpufreq_driver s5pv210_driver = {
>
> s5pv210_cpufreq_driver...
>
>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
>> + .verify = s5pv210_verify_speed,
>> + .target = s5pv210_target,
>> + .get = s5pv210_getspeed,
>> + .init = s5pv210_cpu_init,
>> + .name = "s5pv210",
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + .suspend = s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend,
>> + .resume = s5pv210_cpufreq_resume,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init s5pv210_cpufreq_init(void)
>> +{
>> + if (s5pv210_workaround())
>
> Same...just CPU revision...not workaround...
>
>> + dvs_conf = dvs_conf_workaround;
>> +
>> + arm_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddarm");
>> + if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
>> + pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddarm\n");
>> + goto error;
>> + }
>> + internal_regulator = regulator_get_exclusive(NULL, "vddint");
>> + if (IS_ERR(internal_regulator)) {
>> + pr_err("failed to get regulater resource vddint\n");
>> + goto error;
>> + }
>> + goto finish;
>> +error:
>> + pr_warn("Cannot get vddarm or vddint. CPUFREQ Will not"
>> + " change the voltage.\n");
>> +finish:
>> + return cpufreq_register_driver(&s5pv210_driver);
>
> s5pv210_cpufreq_driver...
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +late_initcall(s5pv210_cpufreq_init);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
> b/arch/arm/mach-
>> s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e1a1c0c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> +/* arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/cpu-freq.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics
>> + *
>> + * MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
>> + *
>> + * S5PV210/S5PC110 CPU frequency scaling support
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> +*/
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
>> +#define __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> +
>> +#define USE_FREQ_TABLE
>
> Where is this used?
None. will be removed.
>
>> +
>> +enum perf_level {
>> + L0 = 0,
>> + L1,
>> + L2,
>> + L3,
>> + L4,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +#define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000) /* Use 800MHz when entering sleep */
>> +
>> +/* additional symantics for "relation" in cpufreq with pm */
>> +#define DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x10
>> +#define ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x20
>> +#define MASK_FURTHER_CPUFREQ 0x30
>> +/* With 0x00(NOCHANGE), it depends on the previous "further" status */
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>> +
>> +#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_CPU_FREQ_H */
>> --
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
MyungJoo Ham (함명주), Ph.D.
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: 82-10-6714-2858
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-26 6:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-22 9:22 [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: S5PV210: CPUFREQ Initial Support MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: Samsung SoC: added hclk/pclk info to s3c_freq for s5pv210 cpu-freq MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: S5P: Virtual Addresses for DMCx registers MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access " MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: S5PV210: macros for clock registers at regs-clock.h MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-22 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-26 4:54 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-26 6:15 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-26 4:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: S5PV210: Allow to probe whether workaround codes are required Kukjin Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox