Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: jassi brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:29:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100127102946.GA13745@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly.
> >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins.
> >
> > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus?
> Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due.
> Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion?

Might've wanted to CC me there... :)  If they're just plain wrong then
it should probably go to Linus, though equally well nobody's been
complaining about it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-27 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-27  5:57 [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines jassisinghbrar
2010-01-27  8:11 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-27  8:15   ` jassi brar
2010-01-27  8:24     ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-27  8:28       ` jassi brar
2010-01-27 10:29     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-01-27 10:37       ` jassi brar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100127102946.GA13745@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=jassi.brar@samsung.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox