From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sdhci-s3c: depend on plat-samsung
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:30:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100611103047.GC12436@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100611052407.GX7248@trinity.fluff.org>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:24:07AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Hmm, Mr Park and Co really need to learn how to handle the treatment of
> patches. I'm really disapointed that these patches get submitted without
> the proper authour accreditation. If this isn't sorted out then I for
> one will start thinking about giving this stuff an automatic reject.
For this specific patch it looks more like the patch was sufficiently
straightforward that two different people ended up coming up with
identical implementations rather than anything else?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 9:39 [PATCH] SDHCI-S3C fixes and enhancements (driver specific code) Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-09 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] sdhci-s3c: depend on plat-samsung Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-11 0:29 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-06-11 5:24 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-11 5:42 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-11 10:30 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-06-09 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] sdhci-s3c: add missing remove function Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-09 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] sdhci-s3c: increase the timeout value Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-10 10:46 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-08-27 19:53 ` Chris Ball
2010-06-09 9:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] sdhci-s3c: add support for the non standard minimal clock value Marek Szyprowski
2010-08-27 19:54 ` Chris Ball
2010-08-28 0:54 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-06-09 9:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] sdhci-s3c: add support for new card detection methods Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-10 12:06 ` [PATCH 5/5 fixed] " Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100611103047.GC12436@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox