[PATCH 10/20] ARM: exynos: Drop unneeded select of MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

[PATCH 10/20] ARM: exynos: Drop unneeded select of MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Support for Samsung Exynos SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7, which selects
ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7.
As the latter selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0, there is no need for
ARCH_EXYNOS4 to select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
---
All patches in this series are independent of each other.
Cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200121103413.1337-1-geert+renesas@glider.be

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index 73ce92a0cdb256dd..52a515017fe709ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS4
 	select CLKSRC_SAMSUNG_PWM if CPU_EXYNOS4210
 	select CPU_EXYNOS4210
 	select GIC_NON_BANKED
-	select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
 	help
 	  Samsung Exynos4 (Cortex-A9) SoC based systems
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH 10/20] ARM: exynos: Drop unneeded select of MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:37:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Support for Samsung Exynos SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7, which selects
> ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7.
> As the latter selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0, there is no need for
> ARCH_EXYNOS4 to select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> All patches in this series are independent of each other.
> Cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200121103413.1337-1-geert+renesas@glider.be
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 -

Thanks, applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH 19/20] ARM: s3c64xx: Drop unneeded select of TIMER_OF

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Support for Samsung S3C64XX systems depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6, and thus
on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
As the latter selects TIMER_OF, there is no need for MACH_S3C64XX_DT to
select TIMER_OF.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
---
All patches in this series are independent of each other.
Cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200121103413.1337-1-geert+renesas@glider.be

 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
index 5700822e3c74b8e4..ac3e3563487fc6f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
@@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ config MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410
 
 config MACH_S3C64XX_DT
 	bool "Samsung S3C6400/S3C6410 machine using Device Tree"
-	select TIMER_OF
 	select CPU_S3C6400
 	select CPU_S3C6410
 	select PINCTRL
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH 19/20] ARM: s3c64xx: Drop unneeded select of TIMER_OF

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:37:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Support for Samsung S3C64XX systems depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6, and thus
> on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
> As the latter selects TIMER_OF, there is no need for MACH_S3C64XX_DT to
> select TIMER_OF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Thanks, applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof