Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@gmail.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next  (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:49:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546FA53D.2060807@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7hzjbko6eb.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

Hello Kevin,

On 11/21/2014 05:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> So, I see two different boot failures on the Peach Pi[t] Chromebooks:
>>
>> 1) next20141121 boot fails due snd-soc-snow
>>
>> Disabling CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW makes the boot to got a little further
>> but still fails with the second issue:
>>
>> 2) next20141121 boot hangs if unused clocks are disabled.
>>
>> I tried to root cause these two issues but didn't see anything evident
>> so I'll find a last known good commit and bisect. If anyone has an
>> idea of the possible causes for these issues that would be appreciated.
> 
> FWIW, in addition to the failures on 5800/peach-pi, I'm also seeing boot
> failures in next-20141121 on the exynos5420-arndale-octa[1].  Adding
> clk_ignore_unused gets things booting there as well.
> 
> What's interesting is that my exynos5422-odroid-xu3 is booting fine as
> well as the exynos5420-arndale and the exynos5410-odroid-xu (shown as
> exynos5410-smdk5410)
> 
> Whatever the issue, it definietly seems like a problem that was came
> through a driver/subsystem tree because that these boards are all
> booting fine with Kukjin's for-next, arm-soc/for-next and
> mainline/v3.18-rc5 (all with just plain exynos_defconfig, and without
> clk_ignore_unused.)  For example, just looking at peach-pi across all
> these trees[2], you can see that it's only failing in linux-next.
>

By bisecting I found that the commit introducing both regressions is:

ae43b32 ("ARM: 8202/1: dmaengine: pl330: Add runtime Power Management support v12")

By reverting ae43b32, next-20141121 boots with both CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW=y
and *without* clk_ignore_unused.

Krzysztof,

I see you are the author of the patch, maybe you can take a look why this
is causing regressions in some Exynos boards?

Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-21 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18 13:53 [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-18 18:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-18 20:28   ` Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-18 22:46     ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 10:09       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-19 16:52   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-19 19:52     ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 22:29       ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-20  7:06     ` Vivek Gautam
2014-11-20  7:51       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-11-20  8:45         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20  9:52           ` Vivek Gautam
2014-11-20 14:24             ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-11-20 15:57             ` Paolo Pisati
2014-11-20 16:44               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20 16:41       ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-20 17:47         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20 18:22           ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-20 23:49             ` Paolo Pisati
2014-11-21 11:33               ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-21 17:32                 ` Ajay kumar
2014-11-21 20:57                   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24 10:05                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24 10:36                       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-11-24 15:05                       ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-25  5:35                         ` Ajay kumar
2014-11-21 13:03             ` Peach Pi/Pit boot failures in linux-next (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init) Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-21 16:38               ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-21 20:49                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2014-11-22 10:21                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-24  9:38                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24  9:42                       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24 10:13                       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-24 11:07                         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24 11:12                           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-24 13:16                             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-24 13:28                               ` Vivek Gautam
2014-11-24 13:53                               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-24  9:51                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-20 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/exynos: Move platform drivers registration to module init Inki Dae
2014-11-20 14:28   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20 15:06     ` Inki Dae
2014-11-20 15:26       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20 17:01         ` Inki Dae
2014-11-21 11:19           ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546FA53D.2060807@collabora.co.uk \
    --to=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=gautam.vivek@samsung.com \
    --cc=gautamvivek1987@gmail.com \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.pisati@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox