public inbox for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, inki.dae@samsung.com,
	tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/17] drm/exynos: atomic modesetting support
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:32:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557A9904.7050308@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150611140152.GA28368@joana>

On 06/11/2015 11:01 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung,
> 
> 2015-06-11 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>:
> 
>> On 06/10/2015 10:36 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> 2015-06-10 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-06-01 17:04, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>>>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here goes the full support for atomic modesetting on exynos. I've
>>>>> split the patches in the various phases of atomic support.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this patchses, however I've noticed a problem after applying
>>>> them.
>>>> The issue gets revealed when support for IOMMU is enabled. I've did my tests
>>>> with Exynos HDMI driver on Odroid U3 board.
>>>>
>>>> To demonstrated the issue I've added following additional debug in the
>>>> exynos
>>>> mixer driver in mixer_graph_buffer() function:
>>>> pr_info("dma addr %pad plane->src_width %d plane->src_height %d\n",
>>>> &plane->dma_addr[0], plane->src_width, plane->src_height);
>>>>
>>>> Before applying patches setting 640x480 mode and getting back to 1920x1080
>>>> console generates following log:
>>>>
>>>> # modetest -M exynos -s 23:640x480
>>>> setting mode 640x480-60Hz@XR24 on connectors 23, crtc 21
>>>> [ 3860.617151] dma 0xbc500000 plane->src_width 640 plane->src_height 480
>>>> ^C
>>>> [ 3870.555232] dma 0xbbd00000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>> [ 3870.565696] dma 0xbbd00000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>>
>>>> After applying atomic modesetting patchset:
>>>> # modetest -M exynos -s 24:640x480
>>>> [  142.540122] dma 0xbbd00000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>> [  142.550726] dma 0xbbd00000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>> setting mode 640x480-60Hz@XR24 on connectors 24, crtc 22
>>>> [  142.643672] dma 0xbc500000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>> [  142.759982] dma 0xbc500000 plane->src_width 640 plane->src_height 480
>>>> ^C
>>>> [  154.986040] dma 0xbbd00000 plane->src_width 1920 plane->src_height 1080
>>>>
>>>> As you can see from the above log, mixer_graph_buffer function is called
>>>> several times. 0xbbd00000 is the DMA address of the 1920x1080 framebuffer
>>>> and 0xbc500000 is the DMA address of the allocated 640x480 buffer.
>>>> mixer_graph_buffer() is first called with the new DMA address of the
>>>> framebuffer, but with the old mode parameters (1920x1080 size) and then
>>>> in the next call it updates the plane parameters to the correct values
>>>> (size changed to 640x480). When IOMMU is not used, this can be easily
>>>> missed, but after enabling IOMMU support, any DMA access to unallocated
>>>> address causes IOMMU PAGE FAULT. Here it will happen after changing DMA
>>>> address of the buffer without changing the size.
>>>>
>>>> A quick workaround to resolve this multiple calls to mixer_graph_buffer()
>>>> with partially updated mode values is to remove calls to
>>>> mixer_window_suspend/mixer_window_resume from mixer_disable and
>>>> mixer_disable functions, but I expect that this is not the right
>>>> approach.
>>>>
>>>> Probably the same problem can be observed with Exynos FIMD driver.
>>>>
>>>> Gustavo: could you check if mixer_enable functions should really
>>>> call mixer_window_resume function, which in turn calls mixer_win_commit,
>>>> which calls mixer_graph_buffer with partially updated display buffer
>>>> data?
>>>
>>> It should not, you are right. This is actually the correct fix. Atomic
>>> modesetting should not do chained calls, e.g., crtc_disable calling
>>> plane_disable. This change was already in my plan actually, but as I had
>>> IOMMU disabled I didn't see it here, and I didn't create this patch yet.
>>>
>>
>> Right, but it needs that crtc_disable calls plane_disable in exynos
>> driver internally. Because crtc is disabled before plane is disabled,
>> it means plane_disable just returns without any register changes,
>> then we cannot be sure setting register to disable plane when crtc is
>> disable.
>>
>> I think a solution is enough only to eliminate calling xxx_resume
>> function in exynos driver function when enable plane, we can remove it
>> because it's called to enable plane from drm atomic modeset framework.
> 
> I think this should work. We really need to disable the planes before
> the crtc is disabled, for FIMD for example, the overlay planes are
> removed from the screen if we remove the _suspend call.
> 
> I'll sent a new patch to remove only the resume part from all our crtc
> drivers.
> 

I sent patchset related, is it same with which you try?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-12  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 15:04 [PATCH v10 00/17] drm/exynos: atomic modesetting support Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 01/17] drm/exynos: fix source data argument for plane Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 02/17] drm/exynos: use adjusted_mode of crtc_state instead of mode Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:09   ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-06-02  0:03     ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-06-02 12:12       ` Inki Dae
2015-06-02 14:09         ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 03/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 1: use drm_plane_helper_update() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 04/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 1: use drm_plane_helper_disable() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 05/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 1: add .mode_set_nofb() callback Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 06/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 2: wire up state reset(), duplicate() and destroy() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 07/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 2: keep track of framebuffer pointer Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 08/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 3: atomic updates of planes Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 09/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 3: use atomic .set_config helper Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 10/17] drm/exynos: atomic phase 3: convert page flips Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 11/17] drm/exynos: remove exported functions from exynos_drm_plane Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 12/17] drm/exynos: don't disable unused functions at init Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 13/17] drm/exynos: move exynos_drm_crtc_disable() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 14/17] drm/exynos: add exynos specific .atomic_commit() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 15/17] drm/exynos: atomic dpms support Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 16/17] drm/exynos: remove unnecessary calls to disable_plane() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-01 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 17/17] drm/exynos: split exynos_crtc->dpms in enable() and disable() Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-02 12:09   ` Inki Dae
2015-06-02 14:06     ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-02 14:19       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-06-03  1:08         ` Inki Dae
2015-06-03  7:53   ` Inki Dae
2015-06-03 13:20     ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-10 10:03 ` [PATCH v10 00/17] drm/exynos: atomic modesetting support Marek Szyprowski
2015-06-10 10:59   ` Inki Dae
2015-06-10 11:38     ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-06-10 12:08       ` Inki Dae
2015-06-10 13:36   ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-11  6:21     ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-06-11 14:01       ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-12  8:32         ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2015-06-15  6:09 ` Inki Dae
2015-06-16 20:35   ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-17 13:00     ` Inki Dae
2015-06-17 14:33       ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-06-18  4:36         ` Inki Dae
2015-06-19 12:20         ` Inki Dae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557A9904.7050308@samsung.com \
    --to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox