From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to iterate over stale request
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:11:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d8666c9983158a4954f30f6b429e797@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210906065003.439019-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3139 bytes --]
+ John Garry
> blk-mq can't run allocating driver tag and updating ->rqs[tag]
atomically,
> meantime blk-mq doesn't clear ->rqs[tag] after the driver tag is
released.
>
> So there is chance to iterating over one stale request just after the
tag is
> allocated and before updating ->rqs[tag].
>
> scsi_host_busy_iter() calls scsi_host_check_in_flight() to count scsi
in-flight
> requests after scsi host is blocked, so no new scsi command can be
marked as
> SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT. However, driver tag allocation still can be run by
blk-
> mq core. One request is marked as SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT, but this request
> may have been kept in another slot of ->rqs[], meantime the slot can be
> allocated out but ->rqs[] isn't updated yet. Then this in-flight request
is
> counted twice as SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT. This way causes trouble in
handling
> scsi error.
Hi Ming,
We found similar issue on RHEL8.5 (kernel does not have this patch in
discussion.). Issue reproduced on 5.15 kernel as well.
I understood this commit will fix specific race condition and avoid
reading incorrect host_busy value.
As per commit message - That incorrect host_busy will be just transient.
If we read after some delay, correct host_busy count will be available.
Right ?
In my case (I am using shared host tag enabled driver), it is not race
condition issue but stale rqs[] entries create permanent incorrect count
of host_busy.
Example - There are two pending IOs. This IOs are timed out. Bitmap of
pending IO is tag#5 (actually belongs to hctx0), tag#10 (actually belongs
to hctx1). Note - This is a shared bit map.
If hctx0 has same address of the request at 5th and 10th index, we will
count total 2 inflight commands instead of 1 from hctx0 context + From
hctx1 context, we will count 1 inflight command = Total is 3.
Even though we read after some delay, host_busy will be incorrect. We
expect host_busy = 2 but it will return 3.
This patch fix my issue explained above for shared host-tag case. I am
confused reading the commit message. You may not have intentionally fix
the issue as I explained but indirectly it fixes my issue. Am I correct ?
What was an issue reported by Luojiaxiang ? I am interested to know if
issue reported by Luojiaxiang had shared host tagset enabled ?
Kashyap
>
> Fixes the issue by not iterating over stale request.
>
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c index
> 86f87346232a..ff5caeb82542 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static struct request
> *blk_mq_find_and_get_req(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
> rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> - if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
> + if (!rq || rq->tag != bitnr || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
> rq = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
> return rq;
> --
> 2.31.1
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-06 6:50 [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to iterate over stale request Ming Lei
2021-09-06 22:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-07 1:14 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-13 1:26 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-13 1:31 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-14 18:41 ` Kashyap Desai [this message]
2021-12-15 3:36 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-15 7:30 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-15 8:02 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-15 8:45 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-15 12:56 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-16 11:55 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-16 12:50 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d8666c9983158a4954f30f6b429e797@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luojiaxing@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox