Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to iterate over stale request
Date: Mon,  6 Sep 2021 14:50:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210906065003.439019-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)

blk-mq can't run allocating driver tag and updating ->rqs[tag]
atomically, meantime blk-mq doesn't clear ->rqs[tag] after the driver
tag is released.

So there is chance to iterating over one stale request just after the
tag is allocated and before updating ->rqs[tag].

scsi_host_busy_iter() calls scsi_host_check_in_flight() to count scsi
in-flight requests after scsi host is blocked, so no new scsi command can
be marked as SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT. However, driver tag allocation still can
be run by blk-mq core. One request is marked as SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT,
but this request may have been kept in another slot of ->rqs[], meantime
the slot can be allocated out but ->rqs[] isn't updated yet. Then this
in-flight request is counted twice as SCMD_STATE_INFLIGHT. This way causes
trouble in handling scsi error.

Fixes the issue by not iterating over stale request.

Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reported-by: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 86f87346232a..ff5caeb82542 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_find_and_get_req(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
 	rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
-	if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
+	if (!rq || rq->tag != bitnr || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
 		rq = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
 	return rq;
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-06  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-06  6:50 Ming Lei [this message]
2021-09-06 22:44 ` [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid to iterate over stale request Bart Van Assche
2021-09-07  1:14   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-13  1:26 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-13  1:31   ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-14 18:41 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-15  3:36   ` Ming Lei
2021-12-15  7:30     ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-15  8:02       ` Ming Lei
2021-12-15  8:45         ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-15 12:56           ` Ming Lei
2021-12-16 11:55             ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-16 12:50               ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210906065003.439019-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luojiaxing@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox