Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6
@ 2005-10-31 17:13 Mark Haverkamp
  2005-10-31 17:32 ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haverkamp @ 2005-10-31 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley, linux-scsi

James,

I updated my local scsi-misc-2.6 tree today and had merge conflicts
somehow.  The tree had not been previously locally modified and was up
to date as of last week.  I used the cg-update command to perform the
update.  After receiving the changes it got a merge conflict:

Applying changes...
Merging fe607aa94f5d25ee84f9a9a4fdf2cce3765e12e4 -> d078650986b117520f2b10cb72c04bc1904e3ba7
        to a25bbd9e2f6c6907672301fe934a8f9989e60330...
... Auto-merging drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
merge: warning: conflicts during merge
... Auto-merging drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
... Auto-merging include/scsi/scsi_device.h

        Conflicts during merge. Do cg-commit after resolving them.


Generally a cg-update works fine. I'm not sure that it makes sense to
have merge conflicts without local modifications. I can just delete the
tree and re-create it from scratch, but I though that I'd ask to see if
others have seen this.

Thanks,
Mark.

-- 
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6
  2005-10-31 17:13 Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6 Mark Haverkamp
@ 2005-10-31 17:32 ` James Bottomley
  2005-10-31 17:36   ` Mark Haverkamp
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2005-10-31 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Haverkamp; +Cc: linux-scsi

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:13 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> I updated my local scsi-misc-2.6 tree today and had merge conflicts
> somehow.  The tree had not been previously locally modified and was up
> to date as of last week.  I used the cg-update command to perform the
> update.  After receiving the changes it got a merge conflict:
> 
> Applying changes...
> Merging fe607aa94f5d25ee84f9a9a4fdf2cce3765e12e4 -> d078650986b117520f2b10cb72c04bc1904e3ba7
>         to a25bbd9e2f6c6907672301fe934a8f9989e60330...
> ... Auto-merging drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> merge: warning: conflicts during merge

My best guess is that your merge programme is confused.  I've had to
merge the tree up several times to fix conflicts, but it's the same
tree.  It looks like whatever tool you used to merge failed to recognise
this.

James



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6
  2005-10-31 17:32 ` James Bottomley
@ 2005-10-31 17:36   ` Mark Haverkamp
  2005-10-31 17:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haverkamp @ 2005-10-31 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 11:32 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:13 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > I updated my local scsi-misc-2.6 tree today and had merge conflicts
> > somehow.  The tree had not been previously locally modified and was up
> > to date as of last week.  I used the cg-update command to perform the
> > update.  After receiving the changes it got a merge conflict:
> > 
> > Applying changes...
> > Merging fe607aa94f5d25ee84f9a9a4fdf2cce3765e12e4 -> d078650986b117520f2b10cb72c04bc1904e3ba7
> >         to a25bbd9e2f6c6907672301fe934a8f9989e60330...
> > ... Auto-merging drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > merge: warning: conflicts during merge
> 
> My best guess is that your merge programme is confused.  I've had to
> merge the tree up several times to fix conflicts, but it's the same
> tree.  It looks like whatever tool you used to merge failed to recognise
> this.

OK, Thanks,  Maybe I need to update my git tools.

Mark.


> 
> James
> 
-- 
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6
  2005-10-31 17:36   ` Mark Haverkamp
@ 2005-10-31 17:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2005-10-31 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Haverkamp; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-scsi

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:36:19AM -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > My best guess is that your merge programme is confused.  I've had to
> > merge the tree up several times to fix conflicts, but it's the same
> > tree.  It looks like whatever tool you used to merge failed to recognise
> > this.
> 
> OK, Thanks,  Maybe I need to update my git tools.

I recently had odd merge problems aswell.  I decided to kill the tree
and recheckout but I got even more odd problems.  Upgrading to the latest
git release helped.

Wishing we'd have a mature SCM once again..


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-31 17:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-31 17:13 Latest update to scsi-misc-2.6 Mark Haverkamp
2005-10-31 17:32 ` James Bottomley
2005-10-31 17:36   ` Mark Haverkamp
2005-10-31 17:38     ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox