From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Robert Tarte <robt@PacificCodeWorks.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] aic94xx: fix routing algorithms
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:54:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152622483.3575.11.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16C8363E16D7234AB844FDB52D4AEA650C2DB6@ntserv.PacificCodeWorks.local>
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 01:30 -0700, Robert Tarte wrote:
> [Tarte, Robert] There is a very specific algorithm for programming the
> routing tables to avoid routing table thrashing in a mixed OS /
> adapter
> multi-initiator environments (the last one I looked at was from the
> SAS-1.1 draft, sas1r07.pdf, project T10/1601-D,
> SASDiscoverSimulation.cpp or see section 4.8.7). I had always assumed
> that the original route table configuration code adhered to that
> algorithm. Has this patch been verified against that algorithm? Or
> does it now come up with the exact same route tables as mptsas? When
> you
> say table routed ports, you mean that both the upstream and down
> stream
> expanders are configured as table routed?
No ... this is the programme in annex L of sas-2, isn't it? Even if it
were available somewhere, the aic94xx doesn't yet have the necessary SMP
tap to try it.
The problem it's solving, which is legal under the sas2 standard is S->T
routing (not T->T which is technically illegal under the standard, but
which this change will also make possible).
If an expander configuration is set up in the recommended cascade (i.e.
T->S) then this addition will never even be activated, so the change
doesn't modify the existing algorithm for the pure and recommended T->S
cases.
And yes, you're right, I'm gearing up to test this out multi-initiator
(when I actually get the right cables) ... and since I don't have a
fanout expander, my configuration is going to have to be
HBA --------- Edge Expander ----------- Edge Expander ---------- HBA
| |
Device Device
James
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-11 8:30 [PATCH] aic94xx: fix routing algorithms Robert Tarte
2006-07-11 12:54 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 15:49 Robert Tarte
2006-07-11 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-09 20:41 James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152622483.3575.11.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robt@PacificCodeWorks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox