From: "Robert Tarte" <robt@PacificCodeWorks.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] aic94xx: fix routing algorithms
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:30:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16C8363E16D7234AB844FDB52D4AEA650C2DB6@ntserv.PacificCodeWorks.local> (raw)
> I've been trying to work out for a while why certain cascaded expander
> configurations work with the mptsas, but don't with the aic94xx.
> Eventually I discovered that the non-functional configurations are the
> ones where the cascaded expander is connected to the parent on table
> routed ports. The problem is that the aic94xx routing algorithms
never
> seem to consider the necessity of a route back to the HBA. This patch
> adds such a routing configuration, and now (at least for all my
> configurations) the hitherto unseen disks become visible.
[Tarte, Robert] There is a very specific algorithm for programming the
routing tables to avoid routing table thrashing in a mixed OS / adapter
multi-initiator environments (the last one I looked at was from the
SAS-1.1 draft, sas1r07.pdf, project T10/1601-D,
SASDiscoverSimulation.cpp or see section 4.8.7). I had always assumed
that the original route table configuration code adhered to that
algorithm. Has this patch been verified against that algorithm? Or
does it now come up with the exact same route tables as mptsas? When you
say table routed ports, you mean that both the upstream and down stream
expanders are configured as table routed?
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-11 8:30 Robert Tarte [this message]
2006-07-11 12:54 ` [PATCH] aic94xx: fix routing algorithms James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 15:49 Robert Tarte
2006-07-11 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-09 20:41 James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16C8363E16D7234AB844FDB52D4AEA650C2DB6@ntserv.PacificCodeWorks.local \
--to=robt@pacificcodeworks.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox