* [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
@ 2007-03-11 19:16 James Bottomley
2007-03-11 20:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2007-03-11 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Currently scsi_wait_scan is only built modular if SCSI is modular.
However, it's perfectly possible for a built in SCSI still to have
modular drivers and thus need scsi_wait_scan as a module. Therefore,
scsi_wait_scan should always be built as a module (unless the kernel
doesn't support modules).
James
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
index 4cd280e..f3bc0f4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
You can override this choice by specifying "scsi_mod.scan=sync"
or async on the kernel's command line.
+config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
+ tristate
+ default m
+ depends on SCSI
+ depends on MODULES
+
menu "SCSI Transports"
depends on SCSI
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Makefile b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
index 79ecf4e..41c7883 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH) += ch.o
# This goes last, so that "real" scsi devices probe earlier
obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG) += scsi_debug.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI) += scsi_wait_scan.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN) += scsi_wait_scan.o
scsi_mod-y += scsi.o hosts.o scsi_ioctl.o constants.o \
scsicam.o scsi_error.o scsi_lib.o \
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
2007-03-11 19:16 [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular James Bottomley
@ 2007-03-11 20:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-11 21:06 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2007-03-11 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi
Hi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> Currently scsi_wait_scan is only built modular if SCSI is modular.
> However, it's perfectly possible for a built in SCSI still to have
> modular drivers and thus need scsi_wait_scan as a module. Therefore,
> scsi_wait_scan should always be built as a module (unless the kernel
> doesn't support modules).
>
> James
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> index 4cd280e..f3bc0f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> @@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
> You can override this choice by specifying "scsi_mod.scan=sync"
> or async on the kernel's command line.
>
> +config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> + tristate
> + default m
> + depends on SCSI
> + depends on MODULES
> +
> menu "SCSI Transports"
> depends on SCSI
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Makefile b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
> index 79ecf4e..41c7883 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH) += ch.o
> # This goes last, so that "real" scsi devices probe earlier
> obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG) += scsi_debug.o
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI) += scsi_wait_scan.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN) += scsi_wait_scan.o
Which means, with this change you cannot build a kernel without module
support but with scsi_wait_scan, which was possible before. Don't know if
anybody would ever want to do this though...
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
2007-03-11 20:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2007-03-11 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-11 21:17 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2007-03-11 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 21:56 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Which means, with this change you cannot build a kernel without module
> support but with scsi_wait_scan, which was possible before. Don't know if
> anybody would ever want to do this though...
I'll do something about that if you can tell me how one might use
scsi_wait_scan without module support in the kernel ...
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
2007-03-11 21:06 ` James Bottomley
@ 2007-03-11 21:17 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-11 21:35 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2007-03-11 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 21:56 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Which means, with this change you cannot build a kernel without module
> > support but with scsi_wait_scan, which was possible before. Don't know if
> > anybody would ever want to do this though...
>
> I'll do something about that if you can tell me how one might use
> scsi_wait_scan without module support in the kernel ...
I won't:-) Just from the comment at the top of the patch I didn't get the
impression that this indeed was its intended result. Building statically
with scsi_wait_scan would mean that you might allow async scan, but then
some time at late_initcall() time you want a sync point. Could this ever
be desired? If not, just ignore my comment.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
2007-03-11 21:17 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2007-03-11 21:35 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-11 22:12 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2007-03-11 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:17 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 21:56 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Which means, with this change you cannot build a kernel without module
> > > support but with scsi_wait_scan, which was possible before. Don't know if
> > > anybody would ever want to do this though...
> >
> > I'll do something about that if you can tell me how one might use
> > scsi_wait_scan without module support in the kernel ...
>
> I won't:-) Just from the comment at the top of the patch I didn't get the
> impression that this indeed was its intended result. Building statically
> with scsi_wait_scan would mean that you might allow async scan, but then
> some time at late_initcall() time you want a sync point. Could this ever
> be desired? If not, just ignore my comment.
scsi_wait_scan is designed to be a module that is loaded *after* you've
loaded all HBA modules that doesn't return from module_init until the
scans previously launched by the HBA module insertions are complete. In
a monolithic kernel, this is done by the async scan infrastructure but
in a modular kernel, you have to have some signal that you've finished
loading the SCSI modules (which is what scsi_wait_scan is).
So, if you build a kernel without module support, ipso facto you have no
SCSI modules to load and therefore you can't have a use for
scsi_wait_scan.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular
2007-03-11 21:35 ` James Bottomley
@ 2007-03-11 22:12 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2007-03-11 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> scsi_wait_scan is designed to be a module that is loaded *after* you've
> loaded all HBA modules that doesn't return from module_init until the
> scans previously launched by the HBA module insertions are complete.
sure
> In
> a monolithic kernel, this is done by the async scan infrastructure but
> in a modular kernel, you have to have some signal that you've finished
> loading the SCSI modules (which is what scsi_wait_scan is).
So, if now (before this patch) you build a monolithic kernel,
scsi_wait_scan will be built in, scsi_complete_async_scans() will be
called at late_initcall time, but it will be redundant because
> In
> a monolithic kernel, this is done by the async scan infrastructure
so, it will just have no effect, right?
If so, then, of course it only makes sense as a module.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-11 22:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-11 19:16 [PATCH] make scsi_wait_scan always modular James Bottomley
2007-03-11 20:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-11 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-11 21:17 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-11 21:35 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-11 22:12 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox