Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix setup_xfer_req invocation

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 2/20/24 01:08, Rohit Ner wrote:
> Allow variant callback to setup transfers without
> restricting the transfers to use legacy doorbell
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Ner <rohitner@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index d77b25b79ae3..91e483dd3974 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2280,6 +2280,9 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag,
>   		ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
>   	if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
>   		ufshcd_start_monitor(hba, lrbp);
> +	if (hba->vops && hba->vops->setup_xfer_req)
> +		hba->vops->setup_xfer_req(hba, lrbp->task_tag,
> +						!!lrbp->cmd);
>   
>   	if (is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
>   		int utrd_size = sizeof(struct utp_transfer_req_desc);
> @@ -2293,9 +2296,6 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag,
>   		spin_unlock(&hwq->sq_lock);
>   	} else {
>   		spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
> -		if (hba->vops && hba->vops->setup_xfer_req)
> -			hba->vops->setup_xfer_req(hba, lrbp->task_tag,
> -						  !!lrbp->cmd);
>   		__set_bit(lrbp->task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
>   		ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << lrbp->task_tag,
>   			      REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);

UFS controllers that are compliant with the JEDEC UFSHCI specification do
not need the .setup_xfer_req() callback so I think a better motivation is
needed to make this change.

Thanks,

Bart.