From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix old SCSI adapter crashes with CD-ROM (take 2)
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:15:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508171519.GG4163@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178643151.3737.44.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Tue, May 08 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:40 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:14 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > The CD-ROM layer doesn't bounce requests for old ISA controllers (and
> > > > > nor should it). However they get injected into the SCSI layer via
> > > > > sr_ioctl which also doesn't bounce them and SCSI then passes the buffer
> > > > > along to a device with unchecked_isa_dma set which either panics or
> > > > > truncates the buffer to 24bits.
> > > > >
> > > > > According to Jens the right long term fix is for the CD layer to route
> > > > > the requests differently but in the mean time this has been tested by a
> > > > > victim and verified to sort the problem out. For the other 99.9% of users
> > > > > it's a no-op and doesn't bounce data.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > >
> > > > Christoph passed me his patch to get rid of ->generic_packet() in the
> > > > cdrom layer, so the work is almost complete. This patch is fine as a
> > > > work-around until that gets merged, though.
> > >
> > > Actually, I think the new scsi request infrastructure should be doing
> > > the bouncing (rather than have it done in each problem path we
> > > discover).
> >
> > Of course, bouncing should only be done in one layer (the block layer).
> > >
> > > Mike Christie tells me we're missing bouncing by accident in the
> > > scsi_execute path (but not the scsi_execute_async path). He says this
> > > is the fix he proposed:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=115981479822790&w=2
> > >
> > > Can we just merge this instead?
> >
> > That's another issue. The problem here are requests (cgc's) initiated by
> > the cdrom.c layer. Those _should_ get mapped to a request and put on the
> > queue for the device, and thus get bounced by the block layer if
> > appropriate.
> >
> > Mike's fix looks legit and should be merged as well, but it wont fix
> > this issue.
>
> It won't? I thought the issue (from the fix) is that cgc->buffer is
> outside of the device accessibility mask. The scsi_execute path
> allocates a request and then calls blk_rq_map_kern on the buffer (in
> this case cgc->buffer) ... the problem is that blk_rq_map_kern() doesn't
> currently bounce the buffer, but if it did (which is the functionality
> Mike's patch adds), surely the need to bounce it in the ioctl path would
> go away?
You are right, I missed that scsi_execute() actually builds a request in
the proper manner.
Mikes patch is in the for-2.6.22 block branch and I asked Linus to pull,
so all should be well.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 16:17 [PATCH]: Fix old SCSI adapter crashes with CD-ROM (take 2) Alan Cox
2007-05-08 16:14 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-08 16:39 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-08 16:40 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-08 16:52 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-08 17:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-05-08 16:46 ` Mike Christie
2007-05-08 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-08 17:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-08 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-08 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-08 17:58 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070508171519.GG4163@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox