public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 12120] [Block layer or SCSI] requests aborted too early during check_partition()
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:16:45 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081130161645.B9D56108041@picon.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12120-11613@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12120





------- Comment #10 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org  2008-11-30 08:16 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com

On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 10:44 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > Theory number two is a block timeout cockup.  It looks like
> > sdev->timeout is vestigial and has zero value, so we shouldn't be using
> > it in the start command, so try this.
> > 
> > If this works, the correct fix will be to kill the sdev timeout
> > parameter so we get a compile failure where anything tries to use it.
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > index 3863617..de3f6d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > @@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ static int scsi_eh_try_stu(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> >  
> >  		for (i = 0; rtn == NEEDS_RETRY && i < 2; i++)
> >  			rtn = scsi_send_eh_cmnd(scmd, stu_command, 6,
> > -						scmd->device->timeout, 0);
> > +						3*SENSE_TIMEOUT, 0);
> >  
> >  		if (rtn == SUCCESS)
> >  			return 0;
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yes, this works with all of the SBP-2 bridges here which exhibit this
> false TEST UNIT READY "GOOD" status.
> 
> BTW, 3 * SENSE_TIMEOUT == 30 seconds may actually be a little bit narrow
> as a START UNIT timeout.  The disks which I tested here --- a few 7200
> RPM IDE or SATA disks behind the SBP-2 bridges --- usually take about 7
> seconds to spin up in single-disk enclosures and 14 seconds in dual-disk
> enclosures, since the bridge spins them up serially.  But a dual-disk
> enclosure with Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 took 28 seconds.  Maybe this
> should be used in scsi_eh_try_stu:
> include/scsi/scsi.h:#define START_STOP_TIMEOUT          (60 * HZ)

Actually, unfortunately not.  This feature isn't designed to spin up non
standards compliant devices, it's designed to restart automatically
stopping media.  As such, the timeout is going to have to go back to
being the queue timeout ... it's just that this exposes a few more
problems than firewire.

James


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-30 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-29 13:19 [Bug 12120] New: [Block layer or SCSI] requests aborted too early during check_partition() bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 15:12 ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-29 18:35   ` James Bottomley
2008-11-29 15:12 ` [Bug 12120] " bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 18:36 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 19:29 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 19:32 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 19:54   ` James Bottomley
2008-11-29 21:30     ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-29 21:45       ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-30  0:08       ` James Bottomley
2008-11-30  9:44         ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-30 16:16           ` James Bottomley
2008-11-29 19:55 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 21:30 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 21:45 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-30  0:08 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-30  9:44 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-30 16:16 ` bugme-daemon [this message]
2008-12-04  1:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-04  6:38 ` bugme-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081130161645.B9D56108041@picon.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox