From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/34] move atp870u_remove to .devexit.text
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:13:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002191317.GA17428@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254406802.3885.1.camel@mulgrave.site>
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:20:02PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> Given that practically every kernel on the planet is hotplug enabled
> these days and that the savings on the very few that aren't from
> discarding the devexit section is at most a page or two (and even arm
> says they don't care about that), there doesn't seem to be any point
> making these changes. In fact, I think we can just kill devinit and
> devexit as section markers.
IMHO you should better kill CONFIG_HOTPLUG completely then.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091001082607.GA2181@pengutronix.de>
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 02/34] move atp870u_remove to .devexit.text Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 14:20 ` James Bottomley
2009-10-02 19:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 08/34] move initio_remove_one " Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 10/34] don't use __devexit_p to wrap lasi700_driver_remove Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 12/34] move megaraid_detach_one to .devexit.text Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 18/34] don't use __devexit_p to wrap NCR_Q720_remove Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 23/34] don't use __devexit_p to wrap sgiwd93_remove Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 25/34] don't use __devexit_p to wrap snirm710_driver_remove Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 27/34] move stex_remove to .devexit.text Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-01 8:28 ` [PATCH 32/34] don't use __devexit_p to wrap zalon_remove Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002191317.GA17428@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox