Re: [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:08:04PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> No that's definitely fine with me, imho most error handling callbacks
>> should be in process context for ease of use in the driver.
>
> Took a closer look. The patch looks incomplete. The hot path for blk-mq is 
> blk_add_timer(), looks like you left that one alone in the conversion?

Oh, damn.  I had that part in my initial version that also crudely
converted the old request code and dropped a bit too much.  That should
defintively do the queue_deayed_work.

> Might be easier to just leave the timer alone, and if it actually fires 
> _and_ we have to do something, punt to a workqueue instead of invoking the 
> timeout handler directly.

queue_delayed_work just assigns two additional fields, then sets
timer->experies and does an add_timer.  So it's the generic implementation
of your above scheme.  I'd much rather use the generic version if
possible instead of trying to recreate it.