From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] blk-mq: do not include passthrough requests in I/O accounting
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220308055200.735835-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308055200.735835-1-hch@lst.de>
I/O accounting buckets I/O into the read/write/discard categories into
which passthrough I/O does not fit at all. It also accounts to the
block_device, which may not even exist for passthrough I/O.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 11 ++++++++---
block/blk.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a05ce77250316..ab4b646551334 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -883,10 +883,15 @@ static inline void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
static void __blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq)
{
- /* passthrough requests can hold bios that do not have ->bi_bdev set */
- if (rq->bio && rq->bio->bi_bdev)
+ /*
+ * All non-passthrough requests are created from a bio with one
+ * exception: when a flush command that is part of a flush sequence
+ * generated by the state machine in blk-flush.c is cloned onto the
+ * lower device by dm-multipath we can get here without a bio.
+ */
+ if (rq->bio)
rq->part = rq->bio->bi_bdev;
- else if (rq->q->disk)
+ else
rq->part = rq->q->disk->part0;
part_stat_lock();
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index ebaa59ca46ca6..6f21859c7f0ff 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int blk_dev_init(void);
*/
static inline bool blk_do_io_stat(struct request *rq)
{
- return (rq->rq_flags & RQF_IO_STAT) && rq->q->disk;
+ return (rq->rq_flags & RQF_IO_STAT) && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq);
}
void update_io_ticks(struct block_device *part, unsigned long now, bool end);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 5:51 move more work to disk_release v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 02/14] blk-mq: handle already freed tags gracefully in blk_mq_free_rqs Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 03/14] scsi: don't use disk->private_data to find the scsi_driver Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 04/14] sd: rename the scsi_disk.dev field Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 05/14] sd: call sd_zbc_release_disk before releasing the scsi_device reference Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 06/14] sd: delay calling free_opal_dev Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 07/14] sd: implement ->free_disk to simplify refcounting Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 4:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 08/14] sr: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 09/14] block: move blkcg initialization/destroy into disk allocation/release handler Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 10/14] block: don't remove hctx debugfs dir from blk_mq_exit_queue Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] block: move q_usage_counter release into blk_queue_release Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] block: move blk_exit_queue into disk_release Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:51 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: do more work in elevator_exit Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 5:52 ` [PATCH 14/14] block: move rq_qos_exit() into disk_release() Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 0:58 ` move more work to disk_release v4 Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-04 16:03 move more work to disk_release v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:03 ` [PATCH 01/14] blk-mq: do not include passthrough requests in I/O accounting Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-06 1:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-03-07 3:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-03-08 3:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-02-27 17:21 move more work to disk_release v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-27 17:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] blk-mq: do not include passthrough requests in I/O accounting Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220308055200.735835-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox