From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 10:06:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230201180637.2102556-1-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
Hi Martin,
Apparently UFS devices perform better when using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of
FUA. Hence this patch series that makes the SCSI core submit a SYNCHRONIZE
CACHE command instead of setting the FUA bit for UFS devices. Please consider
this patch series for the next merge window.
Thanks,
Bart.
Asutosh Das (1):
scsi: ufs: Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA
Bart Van Assche (1):
scsi: core: Introduce the BLIST_BROKEN_FUA flag
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 3 +++
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-01 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 18:06 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-02-01 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: Introduce the BLIST_BROKEN_FUA flag Bart Van Assche
2023-02-01 18:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA Bart Van Assche
2023-02-02 1:54 ` Daejun Park
2023-02-02 4:32 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-02 7:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-02-02 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-02-02 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2023-02-02 19:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-02-02 22:13 ` James Bottomley
2023-02-02 9:01 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230201180637.2102556-1-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox