From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>,
"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@wdc.com>,
Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix the build for gcc 9 and before
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:52:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230801215240.GA534984@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801201337.1007617-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:13:23PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> gcc compilers before version 10 cannot do constant-folding for sub-byte
> bitfields. This makes the compiler layout tests fail. Hence skip the
> layout checks for gcc 9 and before.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 23335aaa6a66..875c860bcc05 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -10564,6 +10564,15 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops ufshcd_wl_pm_ops = {
>
> static void ufshcd_check_header_layout(void)
> {
> +#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ -0 < 10
clang defines __GNUC__ and it does not sound like it is impacted by this
issue? I just built with LLVM 11 through 17 and did not see it. Can this
be made more specific?
Also, can we use IS_ENABLED() and not rely on the preprocessor? This
appears to work for me.
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) && CONFIG_GCC_VERSION < 100000)
return;
> + /*
> + * gcc compilers before version 10 cannot do constant-folding for
> + * sub-byte bitfields. Hence skip the layout checks for gcc 9 and
> + * before.
> + */
> + return;
> +#endif
> +
> BUILD_BUG_ON(((u8 *)&(struct request_desc_header){
> .cci = 3})[0] != 3);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 20:13 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix the build for gcc 9 and before Bart Van Assche
2023-08-01 21:52 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-08-01 23:23 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230801215240.GA534984@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=Arthur.Simchaev@wdc.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox