* [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: support spinup notification for SAS SSP devices in Active_Wait/Idle_Wait state
@ 2026-07-03 2:28 Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11 Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices Xingui Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xingui Yang @ 2026-07-03 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James.Bottomley, martin.petersen, john.g.garry, dlemoal
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, linuxarm, yangxingui, liuyonglong,
kangfenglong
When a SAS HDD connected via SSP (Serial Attached SCSI Protocol) is powered
up with the RNOT (Ready Not Optimized) bit set, the device enters the
Active_Wait or Idle_Wait power state per the SAS protocol specification. In
this state, the device does not respond to standard SCSI START_STOP spinup
commands and instead returns NOT_READY with ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 ("Logical
unit not ready, notify (enable spinup) required").
Without handling this condition, the SCSI mid-layer will indefinitely retry
the command with ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY, resulting in the disk never spinning
up and becoming unusable. A typical manifestation is:
sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Spinning up disk...
...not responding...
sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Sense Key : Not Ready
sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Add. Sense: Logical unit not ready, notify (enable spinup) required
To resolve this, the SAS controller needs to send a NOTIFY(ENABLE SPINUP)
primitive to the target phy, which transitions the device out of the waiting
state and allows normal spinup to proceed.
This patch series addresses the issue:
Adds a new optional spinup_notify callback to struct scsi_host_template
in the SCSI mid-layer. When ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 is detected in
scsi_io_completion_action(), the callback is invoked before the mid-layer
falls through to ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY, giving the LLDD an opportunity to
perform controller-specific spinup notification.
Changes in v2 (addressing Sashiko AI review on v1):
- Add softirq context documentation to spinup_notify in scsi_host.h
- Defer sl_notify_ssp() to ordered workqueue, fixing msleep-in-
atomic bug, preventing RMW races on SL_CONTROL, and deduplicating
concurrent callbacks via queue_work()
Xingui Yang (2):
scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11
scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle
Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 4 +++
include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 12 +++++++++
7 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11
2026-07-03 2:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: support spinup notification for SAS SSP devices in Active_Wait/Idle_Wait state Xingui Yang
@ 2026-07-03 2:28 ` Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices Xingui Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xingui Yang @ 2026-07-03 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James.Bottomley, martin.petersen, john.g.garry, dlemoal
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, linuxarm, yangxingui, liuyonglong,
kangfenglong
When a SCSI device returns NOT_READY with ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11
("notify (enable spinup) required"), the device is in Active_Wait or
Idle_Wait power state and will not respond to standard START_STOP
spinup commands.
Add an optional spinup_notify callback to struct scsi_host_template.
When ASCQ=0x11 is detected in the mid-layer, invoke this callback
before ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY, allowing LLDDs to perform controller-
specific spinup notification.
Example log:
[Tue Jun 23 08:34:44 2026] sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Spinning up disk...
[Tue Jun 23 08:36:22 2026] ...not responding...
[Tue Jun 23 08:36:24 2026] sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Sense Key : Not Ready
[Tue Jun 23 08:36:24 2026] sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Add. Sense: Logical unit
not ready, notify (enable spinup) required
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 4 ++++
include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index b67f0dc79499..33c4339ca8c5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ static void scsi_io_completion_action(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, int result)
case 0x1a: /* start stop unit in progress */
case 0x1b: /* sanitize in progress */
case 0x1d: /* configuration in progress */
+ if (sshdr.ascq == 0x11 &&
+ cmd->device->host->hostt->spinup_notify)
+ cmd->device->host->hostt->spinup_notify(
+ cmd->device);
action = ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY;
break;
case 0x0a: /* ALUA state transition */
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 7e2011830ba4..22bf2d3d9b36 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -374,6 +374,18 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
#define SCSI_ADAPTER_RESET 1
#define SCSI_FIRMWARE_RESET 2
+ /*
+ * Optional callback invoked when a device returns NOT_READY with
+ * ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 ("notify (enable spinup) required").
+ * This allows LLDDs to perform controller-specific spinup
+ * notification before the mid-layer retries.
+ *
+ * Context: Called from softirq (block layer completion) context.
+ * Implementations must not sleep or schedule.
+ *
+ * Status: OPTIONAL
+ */
+ void (*spinup_notify)(struct scsi_device *sdev);
/*
* Name of proc directory
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices
2026-07-03 2:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: support spinup notification for SAS SSP devices in Active_Wait/Idle_Wait state Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11 Xingui Yang
@ 2026-07-03 2:28 ` Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:45 ` sashiko-bot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xingui Yang @ 2026-07-03 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James.Bottomley, martin.petersen, john.g.garry, dlemoal
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, linuxarm, yangxingui, liuyonglong,
kangfenglong
When a SAS HDD disk connected via SSP (Serial Attached SCSI Protocol) is in
Active_Wait or Idle_Wait state (typical after power-up with RNOT=1), it
does not respond to standard SCSI START_STOP spinup commands. Instead it
returns NOT_READY with ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 ("notify (enable spinup)
required").
The hisi_sas controller pulses the SL_CONTROL.NOTIFY_EN bit to send a
NOTIFY(ENABLE SPINUP) primitive to the SSP device, allowing it to exit the
waiting state.
Because the spinup_notify callback runs in softirq context and
sl_notify_ssp() contains msleep(1), the callback queues a
HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY work item to the driver's ordered workqueue
(hisi_hba->wq) and defers the actual hardware access to process context.
The ordered workqueue serializes execution, preventing concurrent RMW
races on SL_CONTROL, and queue_work() deduplicates concurrent invocations.
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h
index 1323ed8aa717..6e21af66442d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ enum hisi_sas_phy_event {
HISI_PHYE_PHY_UP = 0U,
HISI_PHYE_LINK_RESET,
HISI_PHYE_PHY_UP_PM,
+ HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY,
HISI_PHYES_NUM,
};
@@ -689,4 +690,5 @@ extern void hisi_sas_sync_cqs(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba);
extern void hisi_sas_sync_poll_cqs(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba);
extern void hisi_sas_controller_reset_prepare(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba);
extern void hisi_sas_controller_reset_done(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba);
+extern void hisi_sas_spinup_notify(struct scsi_device *sdev);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
index 944ce19ae2fc..14cf01466a75 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
@@ -996,10 +996,22 @@ static void hisi_sas_phyup_pm_work(struct work_struct *work)
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
}
+static void hisi_sas_spinup_notify_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct hisi_sas_phy *phy =
+ container_of(work, typeof(*phy), works[HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY]);
+ struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba = phy->hisi_hba;
+ int phy_no = phy->sas_phy.id;
+
+ hisi_hba->hw->sl_notify_ssp(hisi_hba, phy_no);
+ dev_info(hisi_hba->dev, "spinup notify primitive on phy%d\n", phy_no);
+}
+
static const work_func_t hisi_sas_phye_fns[HISI_PHYES_NUM] = {
[HISI_PHYE_PHY_UP] = hisi_sas_phyup_work,
[HISI_PHYE_LINK_RESET] = hisi_sas_linkreset_work,
[HISI_PHYE_PHY_UP_PM] = hisi_sas_phyup_pm_work,
+ [HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY] = hisi_sas_spinup_notify_work,
};
bool hisi_sas_notify_phy_event(struct hisi_sas_phy *phy,
@@ -2474,6 +2486,28 @@ int hisi_sas_get_fw_info(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hisi_sas_get_fw_info);
+void hisi_sas_spinup_notify(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+{
+ struct domain_device *dev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+ struct sas_ha_struct *sha;
+ struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba;
+ struct sas_phy *local_phy;
+ struct hisi_sas_phy *phy;
+
+ if (dev->parent && dev_is_expander(dev->parent->dev_type))
+ return;
+
+ sha = SHOST_TO_SAS_HA(sdev->host);
+ hisi_hba = sha->lldd_ha;
+
+ local_phy = sas_get_local_phy(dev);
+ phy = &hisi_hba->phy[local_phy->number];
+ if (phy->identify.target_port_protocols & SAS_PROTOCOL_SSP)
+ hisi_sas_notify_phy_event(phy, HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY);
+ sas_put_local_phy(local_phy);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hisi_sas_spinup_notify);
+
static struct Scsi_Host *hisi_sas_shost_alloc(struct platform_device *pdev,
const struct hisi_sas_hw *hw)
{
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c
index fa94d7110714..0179c33f08d4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template sht_v1_hw = {
.sdev_init = hisi_sas_sdev_init,
.shost_groups = host_v1_hw_groups,
.host_reset = hisi_sas_host_reset,
+ .spinup_notify = hisi_sas_spinup_notify,
};
static const struct hisi_sas_hw hisi_sas_v1_hw = {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
index f3516a0611dd..82708a3e71c2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
@@ -3597,6 +3597,7 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template sht_v2_hw = {
.host_reset = hisi_sas_host_reset,
.map_queues = map_queues_v2_hw,
.host_tagset = 1,
+ .spinup_notify = hisi_sas_spinup_notify,
};
static const struct hisi_sas_hw hisi_sas_v2_hw = {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
index 901f508e8be7..330da2503b75 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
@@ -3417,6 +3417,7 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template sht_v3_hw = {
.host_reset = hisi_sas_host_reset,
.host_tagset = 1,
.mq_poll = queue_complete_v3_hw,
+ .spinup_notify = hisi_sas_spinup_notify,
};
static const struct hisi_sas_hw hisi_sas_v3_hw = {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices Xingui Yang
@ 2026-07-03 2:45 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-03 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xingui Yang; +Cc: linux-scsi
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Lockless Read-Modify-Write (RMW) race on the `SL_CONTROL` hardware register between process context (workqueue) and hardirq context.
--
commit 1e2c413ee8dab5cb152dd02e52904e080713afd6
Author: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices
This commit adds a spinup_notify callback for waiting SSP devices. It queues
a work item to the driver's ordered workqueue to send a NOTIFY primitive by
pulsing the SL_CONTROL.NOTIFY_EN bit, which defers hardware access to process
context.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
> index 944ce19ae2fc1..14cf01466a75d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -996,10 +996,22 @@ static void hisi_sas_phyup_pm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> }
>
> +static void hisi_sas_spinup_notify_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct hisi_sas_phy *phy =
> + container_of(work, typeof(*phy), works[HISI_PHYE_SPINUP_NOTIFY]);
> + struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba = phy->hisi_hba;
> + int phy_no = phy->sas_phy.id;
> +
> + hisi_hba->hw->sl_notify_ssp(hisi_hba, phy_no);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the ordered workqueue actually prevent
concurrent RMW races on SL_CONTROL against hardirq context here?
The commit message states that the ordered workqueue prevents concurrent RMW
races on SL_CONTROL, but looking at sl_notify_ssp_v3_hw(), the RMW operation
occurs in process context without interrupt disable or spinlock protection:
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c:sl_notify_ssp_v3_hw() {
...
sl_control = hisi_sas_phy_read32(hisi_hba, phy_no, SL_CONTROL);
sl_control |= SL_CONTROL_NOTIFY_EN_MSK;
hisi_sas_phy_write32(hisi_hba, phy_no, SL_CONTROL, sl_control);
...
}
If an interrupt fires exactly between the read32 and write32 operations,
phy_down_v3_hw() executes another RMW on the same register in hardirq
context:
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c:phy_down_v3_hw() {
...
sl_ctrl = hisi_sas_phy_read32(hisi_hba, phy_no, SL_CONTROL);
hisi_sas_phy_write32(hisi_hba, phy_no, SL_CONTROL,
sl_ctrl&(~SL_CTA_MSK));
...
}
If this preempts the workqueue RMW, wouldn't the process context write
revert the clearing of SL_CTA_MSK done by the interrupt, leading to
hardware state corruption and potentially causing the loss of the PHY/disk
connection?
> + dev_info(hisi_hba->dev, "spinup notify primitive on phy%d\n", phy_no);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703022833.36847-1-yangxingui@huawei.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-03 2:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-03 2:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: support spinup notification for SAS SSP devices in Active_Wait/Idle_Wait state Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11 Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices Xingui Yang
2026-07-03 2:45 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox