From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Garry" <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] scsi-multipath: support iopolicy
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 11:10:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703111046.C57061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703103402.3725011-5-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Newly allocated multipath heads ignore the module parameter default for `multipath_iopolicy`.
- [Medium] Lack of synchronization in `scsi_mpath_device_iopolicy_store()` allows concurrent writes to race and corrupt state.
- [Low] The patch calls several undefined core `mpath_` functions and uses undefined types, causing build failures.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The error path in `scsi_mpath_alloc_head()` performs manual cleanup after `put_device()`, leading to double-free bugs.
- [High] If `device_add()` fails in `scsi_mpath_dev_alloc()`, the error cleanup path crashes due to uninitialized list management and invalid device unregistration.
--
commit dcaa6fb2d7264e46f58295ab1af4b1021442b793
Author: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
scsi-multipath: support iopolicy
Add support to set the multipath iopolicy. The iopolicy member is per
scsi_mpath_head structure. A module param is added so that the default
iopolicy may be set.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
> index cb433a028dbff..6159803d4cbb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -95,8 +112,36 @@ static ssize_t scsi_mpath_device_vpd_id_show(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(vpd_id, S_IRUGO, scsi_mpath_device_vpd_id_show, NULL);
>
> +static ssize_t scsi_mpath_device_iopolicy_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct scsi_mpath_head *scsi_mpath_head =
> + container_of(dev, struct scsi_mpath_head, dev);
> + struct mpath_head *mpath_head = &scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head;
> +
> + if (!mpath_iopolicy_store(&scsi_mpath_head->iopolicy, buf, count))
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: Low]
Are the functions mpath_iopolicy_store(), mpath_clear_paths(), and
mpath_schedule_requeue_work() defined anywhere in the kernel tree?
It looks like calling these will cause build failures.
> +
> + mpath_clear_paths(mpath_head);
> + mpath_schedule_requeue_work(mpath_head);
[Severity: Medium]
Are these sequential operations safe from race conditions when called
without holding any locks?
If multiple threads write to the sysfs attribute concurrently, could they
race and potentially duplicate path clearing or corrupt the I/O policy
state?
> + return count;
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -201,7 +246,9 @@ static struct scsi_mpath_head *scsi_mpath_alloc_head(void)
>
> if (mpath_head_init(&scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head))
> goto out_free;
> +
> scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head.mpdt = &smpdt;
> + scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head.iopolicy = &scsi_mpath_head->iopolicy;
[Severity: Medium]
Will newly allocated multipath heads ignore the module parameter default
for multipath_iopolicy?
Since scsi_mpath_head is kzalloc'd, iopolicy defaults to zero
(MPATH_IOPOLICY_NUMA). This assignment hooks up the pointer but doesn't
initialize it with the global iopolicy module parameter.
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in this function
cause a double-free?
If dev_set_name() fails further down in scsi_mpath_alloc_head():
if (ret) {
put_device(&scsi_mpath_head->dev);
goto out_free_ida;
}
The put_device() call drops the refcount to 0 and synchronously invokes
scsi_mpath_head_release(), which frees the IDA slot, uninitializes the
mpath head, and calls kfree(scsi_mpath_head).
The code then jumps to out_free_ida:
out_free_ida:
ida_free(&scsi_multipath_dev_ida, scsi_mpath_head->index);
out_put_head:
mpath_put_head(&scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head);
out_free:
kfree(scsi_mpath_head);
This manually repeats all of these steps, leading to a double-free and
use-after-free memory corruption.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the device addition error path lead
to a NULL pointer dereference?
If device_add() fails in scsi_mpath_dev_alloc(), it jumps to out_put_head
and calls scsi_mpath_put_head(), which invokes scsi_mpath_free_head():
static void scsi_mpath_free_head(struct kref *ref)
{
...
mutex_lock(&scsi_mpath_heads_lock);
list_del_init(&scsi_mpath_head->entry);
Because device_add() failed, the object was never added to the list via
list_add_tail(). Since scsi_mpath_head was allocated with kzalloc(),
entry.next and entry.prev are NULL, and list_del_init() will dereference
these NULL pointers.
Additionally, device_unregister() is called on a device that failed
device_add(), which violates driver core API expectations.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703103402.3725011-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 10:33 [PATCH v3 00/17] Native SCSI multipath support John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] scsi-multipath: introduce basic SCSI device support John Garry
2026-07-03 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:39 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] scsi-multipath: introduce scsi_device head structure John Garry
2026-07-03 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:45 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] scsi-multipath: provide sysfs link from to scsi_device John Garry
2026-07-03 11:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] scsi-multipath: support iopolicy John Garry
2026-07-03 11:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 14:49 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] scsi-multipath: clone each bio John Garry
2026-07-03 11:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:53 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] scsi-multipath: clear path when device is blocked John Garry
2026-07-03 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:04 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] scsi-multipath: failover handling John Garry
2026-07-03 11:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:32 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] scsi-multipath: provide callbacks for path state John Garry
2026-07-03 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:38 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] scsi-multipath: add scsi_mpath_{start,end}_request() John Garry
2026-07-03 11:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:44 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] scsi-multipath: block PR commands John Garry
2026-07-03 12:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] scsi-multipath: add delayed disk removal support John Garry
2026-07-03 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:49 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] scsi: sd: add multipath disk class John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] scsi: sd: support multipath disk John Garry
2026-07-03 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups John Garry
2026-07-03 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_dev file John Garry
2026-07-03 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:56 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_numa_nodes dev attribute John Garry
2026-07-03 12:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:57 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_queue_depth " John Garry
2026-07-03 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:59 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703111046.C57061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox