From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Garry" <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/17] scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:25:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703122515.6B9AC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703103402.3725011-15-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] The patch references several undeclared identifiers and undefined functions, which will cause fatal compilation and linker errors.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but error paths in `sd_mpath_probe()` incorrectly use `kfree()` instead of `put_device()` after `device_initialize()`, leaking kobject resources. Furthermore, it cannot trivially use `put_device()` without causing a use-after-free and IDA corruption.
--
commit c032527f31f85b7a1e95cfcc2527fe7e368f3474
Author: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups
Set multipath disk attr groups, which includes delayed disk removal and
everything from mpath_attr_group.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 3df70b24b688e..a9a29e50f5eec 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4106,6 +4106,41 @@ static void sd_mpath_add_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> mpath_device_set_live(mpath_device);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t sd_mpath_device_delayed_removal_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct mpath_head *mpath_head = mpath_bd_device_to_head(dev);
> +
> + return mpath_delayed_removal_secs_store(mpath_head, buf, count);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t sd_mpath_device_delayed_removal_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct mpath_head *mpath_head = mpath_bd_device_to_head(dev);
> +
> + return mpath_delayed_removal_secs_show(mpath_head, buf);
> +}
[Severity: Low]
Are the functions mpath_bd_device_to_head(), mpath_delayed_removal_secs_store(),
and mpath_delayed_removal_secs_show() declared anywhere? It looks like they
might be missing, which would cause a build error.
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(delayed_removal_secs, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + sd_mpath_device_delayed_removal_show,
> + sd_mpath_device_delayed_removal_store);
> +
> +static struct attribute *sd_mpath_disk_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_delayed_removal_secs.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group sd_mpath_disk_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = sd_mpath_disk_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *sd_mpath_disk_attr_groups[] = {
> + &sd_mpath_disk_attr_group,
> + &mpath_attr_group,
[Severity: Low]
Is the external variable mpath_attr_group declared and defined? Building with
this patch applied results in an undeclared identifier error.
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> static int sd_mpath_probe(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> {
> struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> @@ -4161,6 +4196,7 @@ static int sd_mpath_probe(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
>
> mpath_head->parent = &sd_mpath_disk->dev;
> mpath_head->drv_module = THIS_MODULE;
> + mpath_head->disk_groups = sd_mpath_disk_attr_groups;
> error = mpath_alloc_head_disk(mpath_head, &lim,
> dev_to_node(dma_dev));
> if (error)
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since we are modifying
sd_mpath_probe(), is it safe to use kfree() on error paths after
device_initialize() has been called on sd_mpath_disk->dev?
If mpath_alloc_head_disk() fails, the code jumps to out_free_disk:
drivers/scsi/sd.c:sd_mpath_probe() {
...
device_initialize(&sd_mpath_disk->dev);
...
error = mpath_alloc_head_disk(mpath_head, &lim, dev_to_node(dma_dev));
if (error)
goto out_free_disk;
...
out_free_disk:
kfree(sd_mpath_disk);
...
}
Should this use put_device() instead to ensure the kobject internals are
properly cleaned up?
However, calling put_device() would invoke sd_mpath_disk_release(), which
unconditionally calls ida_free() and scsi_mpath_put_head(). Would
sd_mpath_disk_release() need to be updated to handle partial initialization if
put_device() were used here?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703103402.3725011-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com?part=14
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 10:33 [PATCH v3 00/17] Native SCSI multipath support John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] scsi-multipath: introduce basic SCSI device support John Garry
2026-07-03 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:39 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] scsi-multipath: introduce scsi_device head structure John Garry
2026-07-03 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:45 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] scsi-multipath: provide sysfs link from to scsi_device John Garry
2026-07-03 11:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] scsi-multipath: support iopolicy John Garry
2026-07-03 11:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:49 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] scsi-multipath: clone each bio John Garry
2026-07-03 11:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 14:53 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] scsi-multipath: clear path when device is blocked John Garry
2026-07-03 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:04 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] scsi-multipath: failover handling John Garry
2026-07-03 11:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:32 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] scsi-multipath: provide callbacks for path state John Garry
2026-07-03 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:38 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] scsi-multipath: add scsi_mpath_{start,end}_request() John Garry
2026-07-03 11:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:44 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] scsi-multipath: block PR commands John Garry
2026-07-03 12:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] scsi-multipath: add delayed disk removal support John Garry
2026-07-03 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:49 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] scsi: sd: add multipath disk class John Garry
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] scsi: sd: support multipath disk John Garry
2026-07-03 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups John Garry
2026-07-03 12:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_dev file John Garry
2026-07-03 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:56 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_numa_nodes dev attribute John Garry
2026-07-03 12:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:57 ` John Garry
2026-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] scsi: sd: add mpath_queue_depth " John Garry
2026-07-03 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:59 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703122515.6B9AC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox