From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 09:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709090006.F317F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709083934.1116862-2-dlemoal@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The eh_timed_out handler prematurely completes the timed-out deferred command, freeing the libata `qc` and causing the SCSI error handler to permanently fail the command instead of retrying it.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out ---
commit 5d7ac082b6ce256e2174fbf7d209e8acc3d6b3a9
Author: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
If a command timeout occurs while we have a deferred non-NCQ command
waiting to be issued, the scsi EH task is never woken up. Avoid this
unnecessary EH trigger wait time by using the eh_timed_out scsi host
template operation to terminate deferred QCs.
Fixes: 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 5868526301a2b..8328778ec0464 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1698,12 +1699,19 @@ void ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc(struct ata_port *ap)
> */
> ata_for_each_link(link, ap, PMP_FIRST) {
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = link->deferred_qc;
> + u32 host_byte;
>
> - if (qc) {
> - link->deferred_qc = NULL;
> - cancel_work(&link->deferred_qc_work);
> - ata_scsi_qc_done(qc, true, DID_REQUEUE << 16);
> - }
> + if (!qc)
> + continue;
> +
> + link->deferred_qc = NULL;
> + cancel_work(&link->deferred_qc_work);
> +
> + if (qc->scsicmd == timed_out_scmd)
> + host_byte = DID_TIME_OUT;
> + else
> + host_byte = DID_REQUEUE;
> + ata_scsi_qc_done(qc, true, host_byte << 16);
[Severity: High]
Does calling ata_scsi_qc_done() here prematurely complete the timed-out
deferred command and free the libata qc?
When a deferred command times out, ata_scsi_eh_timed_out() calls this function
which sets the host byte to DID_TIME_OUT and calls ata_scsi_qc_done().
ata_scsi_qc_done() then frees the qc and invokes the qc->scsidone callback.
Later, when the SCSI completion softirq routes the DID_TIME_OUT command to the
EH queue and the EH thread runs ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler():
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler() {
...
set_host_byte(scmd, DID_OK);
ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
if (qc->scsicmd != scmd)
continue;
if ((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE) ||
qc == qc->dev->link->deferred_qc)
break;
}
...
}
Because the qc was already freed, the ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE flag is cleared
and deferred_qc is NULL. The loop will fail to find the active command.
It seems this causes the handler to fall into the 'raced completion' branch:
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler() {
...
} else {
/* Normal completion occurred after
* SCSI timeout but before this point.
* Successfully complete it.
*/
scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
}
...
}
Could this result in the midlayer completely dropping the timed-out deferred
command (completed with DID_OK and no retries) instead of properly retrying it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709083934.1116862-1-dlemoal@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 8:39 [PATCH v1 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 8:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 9:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 9:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 17:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-09 18:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10 0:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 8:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: libsas: " Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Igor Pylypiv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709090006.F317F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox