From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 19:27:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak_Z7Y1j7yoS_R-J@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcc4f558-7b6e-4193-a943-036255fc202f@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:14:08PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > It seems this causes the handler to fall into the 'raced completion' branch:
> >
> > drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler() {
> > ...
> > } else {
> > /* Normal completion occurred after
> > * SCSI timeout but before this point.
> > * Successfully complete it.
> > */
> > scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
> > scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
> > }
> > ...
> > }
>
> And after this, scsi_eh_flush_done_q() will retry the command.
> Tested and I do not see failure of the deferred QC :)
I don't see how scsi_eh_flush_done_q() will retry the command.
Since ata_scsi_eh_timed_out() calls ata_scsi_qc_done(), which
calls scsi_done(), which calls scsi_done_internal(cmd, false),
which sets SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, scsi_timeout() will never add
the scmd to the list of failed scmds using scsi_eh_scmd_add().
Thus, when ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler() loops though the list
of failed scmds, the scmd in question will never have been added
in the first place.
Most likely the command is retried via:
ata_scsi_qc_done() -> scsi_done() -> scsi_done_internal()
softirq -> scsi_complete() -> scsi_decide_disposition()
scsi_decide_disposition() returns ADD_TO_MLQUEUE for DID_REQUEUE,
scsi_complete() calls scsi_queue_insert(cmd, SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY);
when scsi_decide_disposition() returns ADD_DO_MLQUEUE.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 8:39 [PATCH v1 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 8:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 9:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 9:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 17:27 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-09 18:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10 0:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 8:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: libsas: " Damien Le Moal
2026-07-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Igor Pylypiv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak_Z7Y1j7yoS_R-J@fedora \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox