From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tyrel Datwyler" <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] ibmvfc: delete NVMe/FC targets as well as SCSI
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:52:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723005202.DCBFD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723000149.969416-22-tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] NVMe targets marked for deletion are never processed by the host's worker thread, leading to a stalled state machine and memory leaks.
--
--- Patch [21]: [PATCH v2 21/33] ibmvfc: delete NVMe/FC targets as well as SCSI ---
commit a374ffc0e25726714a6472bd16a2cbadb3641666
Author: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
ibmvfc: delete NVMe/FC targets as well as SCSI
This commit extends target deletion paths to process NVMe targets as well
as SCSI targets. Link-down and host reinitialization flows are updated to
walk both the SCSI and NVMe target lists when marking targets for deletion
to ensure protocol-specific target state stays consistent.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
> index 92c286cfc69c6..1185d72a8a734 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,8 @@ static void ibmvfc_link_down(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
> scsi_block_requests(vhost->host);
> list_for_each_entry(tgt, &vhost->scsi_scrqs.targets, queue)
> ibmvfc_del_tgt(tgt);
> + list_for_each_entry(tgt, &vhost->nvme_scrqs.targets, queue)
> + ibmvfc_del_tgt(tgt);
[Severity: High]
When ibmvfc_del_tgt() is called here for NVMe targets, it sets the target
action and wakes the host's background worker thread (via work_wait_q). Will
these NVMe targets actually get processed by the worker thread?
Looking at the worker thread execution in ibmvfc_do_work():
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c:ibmvfc_do_work() {
...
case IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_TGT_DEL:
case IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_TGT_DEL_FAILED:
list_for_each_entry(tgt, &vhost->scsi_scrqs.targets, queue) {
if (tgt->action == IBMVFC_TGT_ACTION_LOGOUT_RPORT) {
tgt->job_step(tgt);
break;
}
}
...
}
And similarly in the helper function:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c:ibmvfc_dev_logo_to_do() {
...
list_for_each_entry(tgt, &vhost->scsi_scrqs.targets, queue) {
...
}
Both functions strictly iterate over vhost->scsi_scrqs.targets and completely
ignore vhost->nvme_scrqs.targets. Does this leave the NVMe targets stranded
in a pending logout state, resulting in a stalled state machine and memory
leak for the target structures?
> ibmvfc_set_host_state(vhost, state);
> ibmvfc_set_host_action(vhost, IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_TGT_DEL);
> vhost->events_to_log |= IBMVFC_AE_LINKDOWN;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723000149.969416-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com?part=21
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 0:01 [PATCH v2 00/33] ibmvfc: NVMe/FC support over IBM Virtual FC Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/33] ibmvfc: don't call locked done variant for MADs on send failure Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/33] ibmvfc: flush rport_add_work_q during driver teardown Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/33] ibmvfc: check for NULL evt in implicit LOGO and target delete path Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/33] ibmvfc: free ibmvfc_target allocations with mempool_free Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/33] ibmvfc: move target list from host to protocol specific channel groups Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/33] ibmvfc: add NVMe/FC protocol interface definitions Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/33] ibmvfc: split NVMe support into separate source file and add transport stubs Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/33] ibmvfc: initialize NVMe channel configuration during driver probe Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/33] ibmvfc: alloc/dealloc sub-queues for nvme channels Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/33] ibmvfc: add logic for protocol specific fabric logins Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/33] ibmvfc: add wrapper to get vhost associated with a channel struct Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/33] ibmvfc: add helper for creating protocol specific discovery event Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/33] ibmvfc: add helper to check NVMe/FC support with active channels Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 14/33] ibmvfc: allocate and free NVMe channel group discover buffer Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 15/33] ibmvfc: send NVMe target discovery MAD Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 16/33] ibmvfc: add NVMe/FC Implicit Logout and Move Login support Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 17/33] ibmvfc: add NVMe/FC Port " Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 18/33] ibmvfc: add NVMe/FC Process " Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 19/33] ibmvfc: add NVMe/FC Query Target support Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 20/33] ibmvfc: allocate targets based on protocol Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 21/33] ibmvfc: delete NVMe/FC targets as well as SCSI Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 22/33] ibmvfc: update state machine to process NVMe/FC targets Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 23/33] ibmvfc: implement NVMe/FC stubs for local/remote port registration Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 24/33] ibmvfc: register local nvme fc port after fabric login Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 25/33] ibmvfc: process NVMe/FC rports in work thread Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 26/33] ibmvfc: extend ibmvfc_debug visibility to ibmvfc-nvme.h Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 27/33] ibmvfc: declare global function definitions Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 28/33] ibmvfc: implement LLDD callbacks for mapping nvme-fc queues Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 29/33] ibmvfc: implement nvme-fc LS submission transport callback Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 1:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 30/33] ibmvfc: implement nvme-fc IO command submission callback Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 1:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 31/33] ibmvfc: implement nvme-fc LS abort handling callback Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 1:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 32/33] ibmvfc: implement nvme-fc FCP abort callback Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 1:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 33/33] ibmvfc: fail nvme-fc fcp-io and ls requests during transport reset Tyrel Datwyler
2026-07-23 0:58 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723005202.DCBFD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox