* [PATCH v4] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end
@ 2026-07-27 16:48 Jesse Taube
2026-07-27 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Taube @ 2026-07-27 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-scsi, Nilesh Javali, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream,
James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Gustavo A. R. Silva,
Kees Cook, Christoph Hellwig, John Meneghini, Chris Leech,
Jesse Taube, Bryan Gurney, Jesse Taube
In qla_edif_bsg.h: `struct fc_bsg_reply` and `struct fc_bsg_request`
have flexible array members, thus they must be the last member of
the parent structure. Contininging in the effort to add
`-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end`, put `struct fc_bsg_*` inside a
union with the trailing members padded to the size of `struct fc_bsg_*`
to silence the warning. This is similar to TRAILING_OVERLAP, exept
that the position of the flexible array member is also in a union,
causing it to not be the last member of the structure.
Suggested-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jtaubepe@redhat.com>
---
V1 -> V2:
- Rewrite
V2 -> V3:
- Fix commit description
V3 -> V4:
- Accedentally sent V1 ;(
Send correct version.
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
index 514c265ba86e..2b32a3185629 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
@@ -36,16 +36,26 @@ struct extra_auth_els {
} __packed;
struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request {
- struct fc_bsg_request r;
- struct extra_auth_els e;
+ union {
+ struct fc_bsg_request r;
+ struct {
+ unsigned char __fc_bsg_request_sz[sizeof(struct fc_bsg_request)];
+ struct extra_auth_els e;
+ };
+ };
};
struct qla_bsg_auth_els_reply {
- struct fc_bsg_reply r;
- uint32_t rx_xchg_address;
- uint8_t version;
- uint8_t pad[VND_CMD_PAD_SIZE];
- uint8_t reserved[VND_CMD_APP_RESERVED_SIZE];
+ union {
+ struct fc_bsg_reply r;
+ struct {
+ unsigned char __fc_bsg_reply_sz[sizeof(struct fc_bsg_reply)];
+ uint32_t rx_xchg_address;
+ uint8_t version;
+ uint8_t pad[VND_CMD_PAD_SIZE];
+ uint8_t reserved[VND_CMD_APP_RESERVED_SIZE];
+ };
+ };
};
struct app_id {
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end
2026-07-27 16:48 [PATCH v4] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end Jesse Taube
@ 2026-07-27 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-27 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Taube; +Cc: linux-scsi
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing bounds check on user-provided BSG request length leads to out-of-bounds memory accesses when casting to driver-specific structures.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v4] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end ---
commit 5047f2de85357d7b297d2d46b642495d4d1e88e7
Author: Jesse Taube <jtaubepe@redhat.com>
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end
In qla_edif_bsg.h: struct fc_bsg_reply and struct fc_bsg_request have flexible
array members, thus they must be the last member of the parent structure. This
commit puts them inside a union with trailing members padded to silence warnings.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> index 514c265ba86e2..2b32a31856292 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> @@ -36,16 +36,26 @@ struct extra_auth_els {
> } __packed;
>
> struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request {
> - struct fc_bsg_request r;
> - struct extra_auth_els e;
> + union {
> + struct fc_bsg_request r;
> + struct {
> + unsigned char __fc_bsg_request_sz[sizeof(struct fc_bsg_request)];
> + struct extra_auth_els e;
> + };
> + };
> };
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing this structure I noticed a
potential missing bounds check on the user-provided BSG request length.
When a local user with CAP_SYS_RAWIO issues an SG_IO ioctl on the BSG device
with a maliciously small request_len, the BSG core allocates exactly
request_len bytes using memdup_user().
Since the core fc_bsg_host_dispatch calculates the expected cmdlen but never
validates job->request_len against it, could this lead to an out-of-bounds
heap read when casting bsg_job->request to larger structures?
For instance, in drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c:qla2x00_process_vendor_specific(),
vendor_cmd[0] is accessed without checking if request_len is sufficiently large:
ql_dbg(ql_dbg_edif, vha, 0x911b, "%s FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR cmd[0]=0x%x\n",
__func__, bsg_request->rqst_data.h_vendor.vendor_cmd[0]);
switch (bsg_request->rqst_data.h_vendor.vendor_cmd[0]) {
Similarly, in drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c:qla_bsg_check(), the code directly
dereferences req->e.sub_cmd assuming the request buffer is fully sized:
if (p->sub_cmd == PULL_ELS) {
Is it possible to validate bsg_job->request_len before accessing these
driver-specific payload fields to prevent out-of-bounds accesses?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727164842.2123122-1-jtaubepe@redhat.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-27 17:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-27 16:48 [PATCH v4] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end Jesse Taube
2026-07-27 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox