From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiayuan Liang" <ljykernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:25:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805072521.0612F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805065326.1952-1-ljykernel@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The newly added NULL pointer check introduces a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability that fails to completely prevent the NULL pointer dereference.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The patch fails to address the root cause of the race condition, leaving a severe double free / file refcount underflow and use-after-free vulnerability.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks ---
commit a6e54310fce25391e4b63d84129f6076f40ca758
Author: Jiayuan Liang <ljykernel@gmail.com>
scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
The commit message states this fixes a null pointer dereference in
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks caused by a race condition leading to
concurrent invocations of iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn. The patch adds a null
check for the socket pointer before accessing its internal fields.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> index 9260b1c9b0e05..0eabb8b59f46d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> @@ -265,8 +265,12 @@ iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
> {
> struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
> struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
> - struct sock *sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
> + struct sock *sk;
>
> + if (!tcp_sw_conn->sock)
> + return;
> +
> + sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
[Severity: High]
Does this new check fully prevent the null pointer dereference?
Because the check and the subsequent read are lockless and not protected
by READ_ONCE(), the compiler could fetch the tcp_sw_conn->sock pointer
twice.
If another thread sets tcp_sw_conn->sock to null under sock_lock right after
the check, could the second fetch result in dereferencing null here?
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this patch fully address the root
cause of the race condition?
If two threads concurrently execute iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn, they both
read tcp_sw_conn->sock into a local variable:
iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() {
...
struct socket *sock = tcp_sw_conn->sock;
if (!sock)
return;
...
Since both threads can read the non-null pointer before either thread takes
the sock_lock to set it to null, both will bypass this check.
Later in the same function, both threads will call:
...
mutex_lock(&tcp_sw_conn->sock_lock);
tcp_sw_conn->sock = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&tcp_sw_conn->sock_lock);
sockfd_put(sock);
}
Will this cause a double free of the socket file refcount, since both
concurrent threads call sockfd_put on the same locally cached sock pointer?
Similarly, in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_stop, both threads might use the locally
cached sock pointer after it has already been released by the first thread:
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_stop() {
...
struct socket *sock = tcp_sw_conn->sock;
if (!sock)
return;
sock->sk->sk_err = EIO;
...
If one thread finishes iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn first, will the second
thread dereference a freed socket here?
> /* restore socket callbacks, see also: iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_callbacks() */
> write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805065326.1952-1-ljykernel@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 6:53 [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks Jiayuan Liang
2026-08-05 7:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 20:42 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805072521.0612F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljykernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox