* [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
@ 2026-08-05 6:53 Jiayuan Liang
2026-08-05 7:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:42 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiayuan Liang @ 2026-08-05 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lduncan, cleech, michael.christie, James.Bottomley,
martin.petersen
Cc: open-iscsi, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Jiayuan Liang
A null-pointer dereference can occur in
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() due to a race condition
leading to concurrent/re-entrant invocations of
iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn().
Specifically, the re-entrancy can be triggered under the
following scenario:
1. The iSCSI client initiates a logout, actively stopping the
connection via:
iscsi_if_stop_conn()
-> iscsi_stop_conn(..., STOP_CONN_TERM)
-> cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work)
-> iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
2. Simultaneously, a server disconnect triggers a heartbeat
timeout on the client side, executing the timeout path:
iscsi_check_transport_timeouts()
-> iscsi_conn_failure()
-> iscsi_conn_error_event()
-> queue_work(..., &conn->cleanup_work)
This schedules iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn(), which calls:
iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn()
-> iscsi_stop_conn(..., STOP_CONN_RECOVER)
-> iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
If these two paths execute concurrently, iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
is re-entered. Since the first invocation releases the socket and
sets tcp_sw_conn->sock to NULL, the subsequent re-entrant
invocation in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() attempts to
dereference the NULL pointer at `tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk`, resulting
in a kernel panic (Oops):
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
Workqueue: iscsi_conn_cleanup iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn [scsi_transport_iscsi]
RIP: 0010:iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn+0x54/0x110 [iscsi_tcp]
Call Trace:
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_stop+0x5d/0x80 [iscsi_tcp]
iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi]
iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn+0x6e/0xb0 [scsi_transport_iscsi]
process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
worker_thread+0x30/0x390
kthread+0x10a/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Fix this by adding a NULL check for `tcp_sw_conn->sock` in
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() before attempting to access
the socket's internal fields.
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Liang <ljykernel@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
index 9260b1c9b0e0..0eabb8b59f46 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
@@ -265,8 +265,12 @@ iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
{
struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
- struct sock *sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
+ struct sock *sk;
+ if (!tcp_sw_conn->sock)
+ return;
+
+ sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
/* restore socket callbacks, see also: iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_callbacks() */
write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
@@ -277,6 +281,7 @@ iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
}
+
/**
* iscsi_sw_tcp_xmit_segment - transmit segment
* @tcp_conn: the iSCSI TCP connection
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
2026-08-05 6:53 [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks Jiayuan Liang
@ 2026-08-05 7:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:42 ` Mike Christie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-05 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiayuan Liang; +Cc: linux-scsi
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The newly added NULL pointer check introduces a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability that fails to completely prevent the NULL pointer dereference.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The patch fails to address the root cause of the race condition, leaving a severe double free / file refcount underflow and use-after-free vulnerability.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks ---
commit a6e54310fce25391e4b63d84129f6076f40ca758
Author: Jiayuan Liang <ljykernel@gmail.com>
scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
The commit message states this fixes a null pointer dereference in
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks caused by a race condition leading to
concurrent invocations of iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn. The patch adds a null
check for the socket pointer before accessing its internal fields.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> index 9260b1c9b0e05..0eabb8b59f46d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> @@ -265,8 +265,12 @@ iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
> {
> struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
> struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
> - struct sock *sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
> + struct sock *sk;
>
> + if (!tcp_sw_conn->sock)
> + return;
> +
> + sk = tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk;
[Severity: High]
Does this new check fully prevent the null pointer dereference?
Because the check and the subsequent read are lockless and not protected
by READ_ONCE(), the compiler could fetch the tcp_sw_conn->sock pointer
twice.
If another thread sets tcp_sw_conn->sock to null under sock_lock right after
the check, could the second fetch result in dereferencing null here?
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this patch fully address the root
cause of the race condition?
If two threads concurrently execute iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn, they both
read tcp_sw_conn->sock into a local variable:
iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() {
...
struct socket *sock = tcp_sw_conn->sock;
if (!sock)
return;
...
Since both threads can read the non-null pointer before either thread takes
the sock_lock to set it to null, both will bypass this check.
Later in the same function, both threads will call:
...
mutex_lock(&tcp_sw_conn->sock_lock);
tcp_sw_conn->sock = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&tcp_sw_conn->sock_lock);
sockfd_put(sock);
}
Will this cause a double free of the socket file refcount, since both
concurrent threads call sockfd_put on the same locally cached sock pointer?
Similarly, in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_stop, both threads might use the locally
cached sock pointer after it has already been released by the first thread:
iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_stop() {
...
struct socket *sock = tcp_sw_conn->sock;
if (!sock)
return;
sock->sk->sk_err = EIO;
...
If one thread finishes iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn first, will the second
thread dereference a freed socket here?
> /* restore socket callbacks, see also: iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_callbacks() */
> write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805065326.1952-1-ljykernel@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks
2026-08-05 6:53 [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks Jiayuan Liang
2026-08-05 7:25 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-05 20:42 ` Mike Christie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2026-08-05 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiayuan Liang, lduncan, cleech, James.Bottomley, martin.petersen
Cc: open-iscsi, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On 8/5/26 1:53 AM, Jiayuan Liang wrote:
> A null-pointer dereference can occur in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() due to a race condition leading to concurrent/re-entrant invocations of iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn(). Specifically, the re-entrancy can be triggered under the following
>
>
> A null-pointer dereference can occur in
> iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() due to a race condition
> leading to concurrent/re-entrant invocations of
> iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn().
>
> Specifically, the re-entrancy can be triggered under the
> following scenario:
>
> 1. The iSCSI client initiates a logout, actively stopping the
> connection via:
> iscsi_if_stop_conn()
> -> iscsi_stop_conn(..., STOP_CONN_TERM)
> -> cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work)
> -> iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
>
> 2. Simultaneously, a server disconnect triggers a heartbeat
> timeout on the client side, executing the timeout path:
> iscsi_check_transport_timeouts()
> -> iscsi_conn_failure()
> -> iscsi_conn_error_event()
> -> queue_work(..., &conn->cleanup_work)
>
> This schedules iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn(), which calls:
> iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn()
> -> iscsi_stop_conn(..., STOP_CONN_RECOVER)
> -> iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
>
> If these two paths execute concurrently, iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
> is re-entered. Since the first invocation releases the socket and
> sets tcp_sw_conn->sock to NULL, the subsequent re-entrant
> invocation in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks() attempts to
> dereference the NULL pointer at `tcp_sw_conn->sock->sk`, resulting
> in a kernel panic (Oops):
>
We don't want to allow iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn to run after a
termination and we don't want to allow iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn
and iscsi_if_stop_conn to run concurrently.
Can we have iscsi_if_stop_conn hold the conn->ep_mutex when calling
iscsi_stop_conn. iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn would then have a check
for for if the conn->state was ISCSI_CONN_DOWN and if so not call
iscsi_stop_conn.
I think iscsi_if_stop_conn could also call cancel_work_sync
after calling iscsi_stop_conn for both the STOP_CONN_TERM and
STOP_CONN_RECOVER cases instead of calling it for the
STOP_CONN_TERM before calling iscsi_stop_conn.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-05 20:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-05 6:53 [PATCH] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Fix null-pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_restore_callbacks Jiayuan Liang
2026-08-05 7:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:42 ` Mike Christie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox