From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Ahmet Memis" <ali@iusegentoo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 19:44:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806194442.3E9F71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806192345.328621-2-ali@iusegentoo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware I/O object (hio) is permanently leaked on WQE submission failure.
- [High] Hardware I/O object (HIO) is permanently leaked on successful ELS and BLS completions.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO ---
commit 9f7986d6f2e47353fa2d9861b16b7f4d623a7b71
Author: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>
scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO
This commit moves the hardware state check in efct_els_hw_srrs_send to
happen before allocating a hardware I/O (HIO) object. This prevents an
HIO object leak that previously occurred when the hardware state was not
active.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c
> index b79c6a7ea7912..15c37ff1d52e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c
> @@ -2706,18 +2706,18 @@ efct_els_hw_srrs_send(struct efc *efc, struct efc_disc_io *io)
> u32 sge0_flags;
> u32 sge1_flags;
>
> - hio = efct_hw_io_alloc(hw);
> - if (!hio) {
> - pr_err("HIO alloc failed\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> if (hw->state != EFCT_HW_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> efc_log_debug(hw->os,
> "cannot send SRRS, HW state=%d\n", hw->state);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> + hio = efct_hw_io_alloc(hw);
> + if (!hio) {
> + pr_err("HIO alloc failed\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this function leak the
newly allocated hio object if WQE submission fails further down?
If efct_hw_wq_write() fails at the end of efct_els_hw_srrs_send():
hio->wq->use_count++;
rc = efct_hw_wq_write(hio->wq, &hio->wqe);
if (rc >= 0) {
/* non-negative return is success */
rc = 0;
} else {
/* failed to write wqe, remove from active wqe list */
efc_log_err(hw->os,
"sli_queue_write failed: %d\n", rc);
hio->xbusy = false;
}
return rc;
The function returns the error but it doesn't appear to call
efct_hw_io_free(hw, hio), leaving the hio object stranded. Could this
eventually exhaust the adapter's hardware IO pool during transient queue
full conditions?
This same pattern appears to exist in efct_hw_bls_send() when either
sli_xmit_bls_rsp64_wqe() or efct_hw_wq_write() fails.
> hio->done = efct_els_ssrs_send_cb;
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is the hio object leaked on
successful completions as well?
Looking at the callback assigned here:
drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c:efct_els_ssrs_send_cb() {
struct efc_disc_io *io = arg;
efc_disc_io_complete(io, length, status, ext_status);
return 0;
}
The callback executes the completion handler but doesn't drop the
reference to the passed hio object.
The overarching WQE completion handler efct_hw_wq_process_io() also seems
to drop the WQE and call done(), but leaves the hio pointer allocated.
Are we missing an efct_hw_io_free(hw, hio) call on the success paths
for ELS and BLS completions?
> hio->arg = io;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806192345.328621-1-ali@iusegentoo.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 19:23 [PATCH 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:57 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806194442.3E9F71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ali@iusegentoo.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox